Conclusion
The argument suggests that it is very hard to separate how, in fact, economists use theory and how the subjects of economics use theory. Further, we can explain why, after a dazzling wave of the hands, so much popular discussion of economic policies switches from real-valued considerations to infinitely-valued considerations. And, why it seems that only economists object. It has been the fate of economists across the centuries to insist that costs do matter, a proposition presupposing a world purged of infinities. For if there is an infinite distance between commodities (a noneconomist would have written down one word for the higher things and another for the lower), then cost truly does not matter.
We have given a positive account of ‘fairness’ and generated some implications about the content of public opinion which will be relatively straightforward to test.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle. (1934). Nicomachean ethics. Trans. H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library.
Aristotle. (1944). The politics. Trans. H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library.
Arrow, K.J. (1963). Social choice and individual values. Second ed. New Haven and London.
Buchanan, J. (1960). Positive economics, welfare economics, and political economy. [1959]. Fiscal theory and political economy. Chapel Hill.
Buchanan, J., and Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor.
Grether, D., and Plott, C. (1979). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review 69: 623 - 638.
Keisler, H.J. (1976). Elementary calculus. Boston.
Knight, F.H. (1951). The ethics of competition. New York.
Knight, F.H. (1933). In defense of communism. Chicago.
Langholm, O. (1979). Price and value in the Aristotelian tradition. Oslo.
Levy, D. (1978a). Adam Smith's ‘Natural law’ and contractual society. Journal of the History of Ideas 39: 665 - 74.
Levy, D. (1978b). Some normative aspects of the Malthusian controversy. History of Political Economy 10: 271 - 85.
Levy, D. (1981). Choice theory for choosing theorists: Smith and Kant respond to Mandeville. Presented at the American Economic Association, Washington, December 1981.
Levy, D. (1982). Rational choice and morality: Economics and classical philosophy. History of Political Economy 14: 1 - 36.
Olson, M., and Bailey, M.J. (1981). Positive time preference. Journal of Political Economy 89: 1 - 25.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge.
Richter, M.K. (1971). Rational choice. In J.S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M.K. Richter and H.F. Sonnenschein (Eds.), Preferences, utility and demand. New York.
Robinson, A. (1974). Non-standard analysis. Second ed. Amsterdam.
Savage, L.J. (1972). The foundations of statistics. Second ed. New York.
Sowell, T. (1980). Knowledge and decisions. New York.
Smith, A. (1976a). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Ed. W.B. Todd. Oxford.
Smith, A. (1976b). The theory of moral sentiments. Ed. D.D. Raphael and A.L. Macfie. Oxford.
Stigler, G.J. (1980). The ethics of competition. University of Chicago Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
Stigler, G.J., and Becker, G.S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review 67: 76 - 90.
Tullock, G. (1971). The charity of the uncharitable. Western Economic Journal 9: 379 - 391.
Viner, J. (1978). Religious thought and economic society. History of Political Economy 10: 1 - 192.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levy, D. Towards a neoaristotelean theory of politics: A positive account of ‘fairness’. Public Choice 42, 39–54 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124598
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124598