Skip to main content
Log in

Variation and covariation of silage maize digestibility estimated from digestion trials with sheep

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Variation and covariation for agronomic and digestibility traits of silage maize are reported from a compilation of 22 years of experiments with standard sheep. Genotype effects of DOM and DCF were highly significant, even when genotypes were nested in earliness groups or brown-midrib hybrids discarded (Table 2). The genetic variance of crude fiber content was low, but the variance of the DCF was high. The genetic variance of DOM was about 4 times lower than genetic variance of DCF, but broad sense heritability of DOM was higher because of lower residual variance (Table 3). Genetic correlations between grain or crude fiber content and DOM had similar absolute values, 0.65, so each of these two traits was an important but not the unique determinant of silage maize quality. There was no correlation between DCF and grain or crude fiber content. Yield was not related to DOM or DCF within each group of earliness, allowing some quality improvement without agronomic drift (Table 4). Except for late hybrids, most of DOM differences between groups of earliness came from lowering of minimum value, while maximum values were similar. It was the contrary for DCF, with similar minimum values for all groups (Table 5). There was no obvious correlation between year of registration of hybrids and DOM or DCF, but extra new variation seemed obtained only for low values (Figs 1, 2; Table 6). IVDOM according to the APC process was a poor predictor of DOM, especially when brown-midrib hybrids and earliness effects were discarded; but because heritability of this trait was similar to DOM heritability, such enzymatic processes could probably be used to avoid drift towards poor DOM with hybrids bred for higher stalk strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

APC:

Amylase Pepsine Cellulase solubility

DDM:

sheep digestibility of dry matter

DOM:

sheep digestibility of organic matter

DCF:

sheep digestibility of crude fiber

DM:

dry matter

IVDCW:

in vitro digestibility of cell wall

IVDDM:

in vitro digestibility of dry matter

IVDOM:

in vitro digestibility of organic matter

NIRS:

near infra-red reflectance spectroscopy

NDF:

neutral detergent fiber

bm1-brown-midrib-1 allele, bm3-brown:

midrib-3 allele

References

  • Aerts, J.V., 1986. Use of sheep as pilot animals for predicting digestibility of feeds to be fed to dairy cows. IDF Bulletin 196: 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, K.A., M.J., Martin, W.A., Russel, W.F., Wedin & D.R., Buxton, 1986. Chemical and in vitro dry matter composition of maize stalks after selection for stalk strength and stalk-rot resistance. Crop Sci. 26: 1051–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrieu, J., 1985. Composition et valeur alimentaire du mais plante entière. Colloque mais ensilage, Rennes, 29–30 Mai 1985, tome 1, 25 pages.

  • Andrieu, J. & C., Demarquilly, 1974a. Valeur alimentaire du mais fourrage. II. Influence du stade de végétation, de la variété, du peuplement, de l'enrichissement en épis et de l'addition d'urée sur la digestibilité et l'ingestibilité l'ensilage de mais. Ann. Zootech., 23: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrieu, J. & C., Demarquilly, 1974b. Valeur alimentaire du maïs fourrage. III. Influence de la composition et des caractéristiques fermentaires sur la digestibilité et l'ingestibilité des ensilages de maïs. Ann. Zootechn., 23: 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachacou, J., J.P. Masson & C. Millier, 1981. Amance 1981. manuel de la programmation statistique. CNRF, INRA.

  • Barrière, Y. & R. Traineau, 1985. Characterization of silage maize: Patterns of dry matter production, LAI evolution and feeding value in late and early genotypes. Proceedings of the 13th congress maize and sorghum section of Eucarpia, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 9–12 September 1985: 131–136.

  • Barrière, Y. & J.C., Emile, 1990. Effet des teneurs en grain et de la variabilité génétique sur la valeur énergétique du mais ensilage mesurée par des vaches laitières. Agronomie 10: 201–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrière, Y., C., Demarquilly, Y., Hebert, P., Dardenne, J., Andrieu, P., Maupetit, M., Lila & J.C., Emile, 1991. Influences de la variabilité génétique et environnementale sur la digestibilité in vitro ou in vivo du mais fourrage. Agronomie 3: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beerepoot, L., 1981. The genetic variation in digestibility of forage maize (in Dutch). Agricultural University Wageningen, Dept Field Crops & Grassland Sci., Thesis Agric. Univ., 43 p.

  • Besle, J.M., J.P. Jouany & J.P. Dulphy, 1991. Roles and transformation of phenyl propane phenolics in cell walls digestion. Miscellaneous paper, INRA CRZV Theix.

  • Chenost, M. & W., Martin-Rosset, 1985. Comparaison entre espèces (mouton, cheval, bovin) de la digestibilité et des quantités ingérées des fourrages verts. Ann. Zootechn., 34: 291–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardenne, P., J. Andrieu, Y. Barrière, R. Biston, C. Demarquilly, N. Femenias, M. Lila, P. Maupetit, F. Rivière & T. Ronsin, 1991. Prévision de la digestibilité du mais. Miscellaneous paper of the French ‘Club digestibilité’: 34 p.

  • Deinum, B. & J.J., Bakker, 1981. Genetic differences in digestibility of forage maize hybrids. Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 29. 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deinum, B., A., Steg & G., Hof, 1984. Measurement and prediction of digestibility of forage maize in the Netherlands. Animal Feed Sci. and Techn., 10: 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deinum, B. & P.C. Struik, 1985. Improving the nutritive value of forage maize. Proceedings of the 13th congress maize and sorghum section of Eucarpia, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 9–12 September 1985, p. 77–90.

  • Deinum, B., 1987. Genetic and environmental variation in digestibility of forage maize in Europe. Fao report of the subnetwork ‘the nutritive value of the whole maize plant’, 18 pages.

  • Deinum, B. & P.C., Struik, 1989. Genetic variation in digestibility of forage maize (Zea mays L.) and its estimation by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS). An analysis. Euphytica, 42: 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarquilly, C. & P., Weiss, 1971. Liaisons entre les quantités de matière sèche de fourrage vert ingérées par les moutons et celles ingérées par les ovins. Ann. Zootechn., 20: 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derieux, M., M., Darrigand, A., Gallais, Y., Barrière, D., Bloc & Y., Montalant, 1987. Estimation du progrès génétique réalisé chez le mais grain en France entre 1950 et 1985 Agronomie 7 (1): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, N.D. & W.R., Becker, 1960. De verteerbaarheid en voederwaarde van verse en geenslieerde snijmais. Pudoc. Wageningen, Verslagen van landbouwkundige onderzoekingen 66.14, 48 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon, B.S., C., Paul, E., Zimmer, P.A., Gurrath, D., Klein & W.G., Polmer, 1990. Variation and covariation in stover digestibility traits in diallel crosses of maize. Crop Sci. 30: 931–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolstra, O. & J.H. Medema, 1990. An effective screening method for improvement of cell-wall digestibility in forage maize. Proceedings of XVth Eucarpia congress Maize-Sorghum June 4–8 1990, Baden, Austria, 258–270.

  • El-Shazy, K., B.A., Dehority & R.R., Johnson, 1961. Effect of starch on the digestion of cellulose in vitro and in vivo by tumen micro-organisms. J. Anim. Sci. 20: 268–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairey, N.A., 1982. Influence of population density and hybrid maturity on productivity and quality of forage maize. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62: 427–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faverdin, P., A., Hoden & J.B., Coulon, 1987. Recommendations alimentaires pour les vaches laitières. Bull Tech C.R.Z.V. Theix, INRA, 70: 132–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallais, A., M., Pollacsek & L., Huguet, 1976. Possibilités de sélection du maïs en tant que plante fourragère. Ann. Amélior. Plantes 26: 591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giger, S. & S., Pochet, 1987. Méthodes d'estimation des constituants pariétaux dans les aliments destinés aux ruminants. Bul. Tech. C.R.Z.V.Theix, INRA, 70: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenet, E. & P., Barry, 1991. Microbial degradation of normal maize and bm3 maize in the rumen observed by scanning electron microscopy. J. Sci. Food Agric. 54: 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrige, R., 1988. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. Ouvrage collectif dirigé par. I.N.R.A. Ed., 471 pages.

  • Jung, H.G., 1989. Forage lignins and their effects on fiber digestibility. Agron J. 81: 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.T., J.T., Gillingham & C.B., Loadhot, 1967. Difference in composition between crude fiber and acid detergent fiber. J. Assoc. off. Anal. Chem. 50: 340–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lila, M., Y., Barrière & R., Traineau, 1986. Mise au point et étude d'un test enzymatique de la digestibilité de fourrages pauvres ou riches en amidon. Agronomie 6: 285–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, J.B., C., Lemerle & T.E., Trigg, 1988. The intake and digestion of maize silage-based diet by dairy cows and sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20, 239–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvant, D., 1988. Composition et analyse des aliments. In: Alimentation des bovins et des caprins, Jarrige R., INRA éd. p. 305–314.

  • Struik, P.C., 1983. Physiology of forage maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to its production and quality. Thesis, Agricultural University of Wageningen, 252 pages.

  • Struik, P.C. & B. Deinum, 1990. The ideotype for forage maize (with special reference to nutritive value). Proceedings of XVth Eucarpia congress Maize-Sorghum June 4–8 1990, Baden, Austria 223–233.

  • Struik, P.C. & O. Dolstra, 1990. Some remarks on session III in nutritive value of forage maize. Proceedings of XVth Eucarpia Congress Maize-Sorghum, June 4–8 1990, Baden, Austria, 333–336.

  • Tilley, J.M.A. & R.A., Terry, 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 18: 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traineau, R., 1991. Mise au point d'un matériel de récolte et de confections de silos adapté à des parcelles expérimentales. Accepté pour publication dans Fourrages.

  • Vattikonda, M.R. & R.B., Hunter, 1982. Comparison of grain yield and whole plant silage production of recommended corn hybrids. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63: 601–609.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrière, Y., Traineau, R., Emile, J.C. et al. Variation and covariation of silage maize digestibility estimated from digestion trials with sheep. Euphytica 59, 61–72 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025362

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025362

Key words

Navigation