Abstract
The magnitude of the effect of salt stress on proline content, pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P5C) reductase activity and water relations was found to be leaf position dependent in an advance generation (R4) of twoBrassica juncea L. somaclones (SR-2 and SR-3) selected in vitro for NaCl-tolerance and the parent cv. Prakash. Free proline content and P5C reductase activity increased with increase in salt stress in all the lines but at different rates; the maximum increase being in the SR-3 derived somaclonal line. At 100 mM NaCl, SR-3 showed a nearly 19 fold increase in proline content compared to a 4–5 fold increase in the other two genotypes. The proline level and P5C reductase activity of the first (youngest) leaf was higher than in the other leaves and decreased linearly with increase in age of the leaf in all the lines. The relationship between relative water content and osmotic potential of the leaves at different positions also varied. The results indicate that a significant effect of salt may appear non-significant if the position of the leaves is not taken into account while sampling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amon D I and Hoagland D R 1940 Crop production in artificial solution with special reference to factors affecting yield and absorption of inorganic nutrients. Soil Sci. 50, 463–485.
Ashraf M 1989 The effect of NaCl on water relations, chlorophyll and protein and proline contents of two cultivars of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.). Plant and Soil 119, 205–210.
Aspinall D and Paleg L G 1981 Proline accumulation: physiological aspects.In The Physiology and Biochemistry of Drought Resistance in Plants. Eds. L G Paleg and D Aspinall. pp 205–241, Academic Press, Sydney.
Bates L S, Waldren R P and Teare I D 1973 Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39, 205–207.
Boggess S F, Aspinall D and Paleg L G 1976 Stress metabolism. IX. The significance of end-product inhibition of proline biosynthesis and of compartmentation in relation to stress-induced proline accumulation. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 3, 513–525.
Chandler S F and Thorpe T A 1987 Characterization of growth, water relations and proline accumulation in sodium sulfate tolerant callus ofBrassica napus L. cv. Westar (canola). Plant Physiol. 84, 106–111.
Chavan P D and Karadge B A 1986 Growth, mineral nutrition, organic constituents and rate of photosynthesis inSesbenia glandiflora L. grown under saline conditions. Plant and Soil 92, 395–404.
Chowdhury J B, Jain S and Jain R K 1993 Biotechnological approaches for developing salt-tolerant crops. J. Plant Biochem. Biotech. 2, 1–7.
Dix P J 1986 Cell line selection.In Plant Cell Culture Technology. Ed. M.M.Yeoman, pp 143–201. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.
Dix P J, Mclysaght U A and Pearce R S 1984 The potential of cell cultures for the production of salt-tolerant cultivars.In Efficiency in Plant Breeding. Eds. W Lange, A C Zeven and N G Hogenboom, pp 219–22, Pudoc Wageningen.
Evans L T, Wardlaw I F and Fischer R A 1975 Wheat.In Crop Physiology. Ed. L T Evans, pp 101–115, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Geay A, Vartanian N and Queiroz O 1984 Variations des teneurs en polyamines et leur precurseurs au cours de l'adaptation morphogenetique de colza,Brassica napus L. var.oleifera a la secheresse. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 131 (Actual Bot 1), 99–111.
Hassan N S and Wilkins D A 1988In vitro selection for salt-tolerant lines inLycopersicon peruvianum. Plant Cell Rep. 7, 463–466.
Jain R K, Jain S, Nainawatee H S and Chowdhury J B 1990 Salt-tolerance inBrassica juncea L.I.In vitro selection, agronomic evaluation and genetic stability. Euphytica 48, 141–151.
Jain R K, Jain S and Chowdhury J B 1991aIn vitro selection for salt tolerance inBrassica juncea L. using cotyledon explants, callus and cell suspension cultures. Ann. Bot. 67, 517–519.
Jain S, Nainawatee H S, Jain R K and Chowdhury J B 1991b Proline status of genetically stable salt tolerantBrassica juncea L. somaclones and their parent cv. Prakash. Plant Cell Reports 9, 684–687.
Jain S, Nainawatee H S, Jain R K and Chowdhury J B 1993 Water relations and osmoregulation in leaves ofin vitro selected salt tolerant plants ofBrassica juncea L. Ind. J. Exp. Biol. 31, 332–337.
Kandpal R P, Vaidyanathan C S, Udaykumar M, Krisnasastry K S and Appaji-Rao N 1981 Alteration in the activities of the enzyme of proline metabolism in ragi (Eleusine coracane) leaves during water stress. J. Biosci. 3, 361–369.
Kueh J S H and Bright S W J 1982 Biochemical and genetical analysis of three proline accumulating barley mutants. Plant Sci. Lett. 27, 233–241.
Kumar D 1984 The value of certain plant parameters as an index for salt tolerance in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Plant and Soil 79, 261–271.
Kumar V and Sharma D R 1989 Selection and characterization of an L-thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid resistant callus cultures ofVigna radiata (L.) Wilczek var. radiata. Plant Cell Rep. 7, 648–651.
Le-Rudulier D, Strom A R, Dandekar A M, Smith L T and Valentine R C 1984 Molecular biology of osmoregulation. Science 224, 1064–1068.
Lowry O H, Rosebrough N J, Farr A L and Randall R J 1951 Protein measurement with folin-phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275.
Mezl V A and Knox W E 1976 Properties and analysis of a stable derivative of pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid for use in metabolic studies. Anal. Biochem. 74, 430–440.
Morgan J M 1983 Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 34, 607–614.
Morgan J M 1992 Adaptation to water deficits in three grain legume species. Mechanism of turgor maintenance. Field Crop Res. 29, 91–106.
Naik C R and Joshi C L 1983 Ineffectual role of proline metabolism in salt stressed sugarcane leaves. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 92, 265–269.
Pandey R and Ganapathy P S 1985 The proline enigma: NaCl-tolerant and NaCl-sensitive callus lines ofCicer arietinum. Plant Sci. 40, 13–17.
Radin J W 1992 Reconciling water-use efficiencies of cotton in field and laboratory. Crop Sci. 32, 13–18.
Sheoran I S and Nainawatee H S 1990 Metabolic changes in relation to environmental stresses.In Plant Biochemistry Research in India. Ed. R Singh. pp 157–178, The Society for Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, New Delhi, India.
Shevyakowa N I 1984 Metabolism and physiological role of proline in plants under conditions of water and salt stress. Sov. Plant Physiol. 31, 597–608.
Stewart G R and Lee J A 1974 The role of proline accumulation in halophytes. Planta 120, 279–289.
Strecker H J 1971 Preparation of animal proline oxidase (rat liver) and its use for the preparation of Δ′-pyrroline-5-carboxylate.In Methods of Enzymology, Vol XVII B. Eds. H Tabor and C W Tabor, pp 251–252, Academic Press, New York.
Turner N C and Begg J E 1981 Plant water relations and adaptation to stress. Plant and Soil 53, 97–131.
Turner N C, Toole J L, Cruz R T, Yambao E B, Ahmad S, Namuco O S and Dingkuhn M 1986 Responses of seven diverse rice cultivars to water deficits. II. Osmotic adjustment, leaf elasticity, leaf extension, leaf death, stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Field Crop Res. 13, 273–286.
Vartanian N, Hervochon P, Marcoette L and Larher F 1992 Proline accumulation during drought rhizogenesis inBrassica napus var.oleifera. Plant Physiol. 140, 623–628.
Wardlaw I F and Moncur L 1976 Source, sink and hormonal control of translocation in wheat. Planta 128, 93–100.
Watad A E E, Reinhold L and Lerner H R 1983 Comparison between a stable NaCl-selectedNicotiana cell line and the wild type. K, Na and proline pools as a function of salinity. Plant Physiol. 73, 624–629.
Widholm J M 1988In vitro selection with plant cell and tissue cultures. Iowa State J. Res. 62, 587–595.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madan, S., Nainawatee, H.S., Jain, S. et al. Leaf position-dependent changes in proline, pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase activity and water relations under salt-stress in genetically stable salt-tolerant somaclones ofBrassica juncea L.. Plant Soil 163, 151–156 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007963
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007963