Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of clay tile, sterilized rock, and natural substrate diatom communities in a small stream in Southeastern Michigan, USA

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Periphytic diatom communities on clay tile and sterilized rock substrates were compared with those on natural substrates. Clay tiles yielded diatom communities with the least variability between replicate samples, and the greatest similarity to the natural substrate assemblage. The advantages of utilizing introduced substrate communities and problems encountered with their simulation of the natural substrate community are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adey, W. H. & Vasser, M. M. 1975. Colonization, succession and growth rates of tropical crustose coralline algae (Rhodophyta, Cryptonemiales). Phycologia 14: 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, J. L. 1954. Two winter diatom communities of Michigan streams. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts Letts. 39: 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, J. L. 1957. An ecological study of the algae of the Saline River, Michigan. Hydrobiologia 9: 361–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. D. 1976. A comparison of the attached algal communities of a natural and an artificial substrate. J. Phycol. 12: 301–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, G. B. & Weber, C. I. 1978. Phycoperiphyton (algae) as indicators of water quality. Trans. Amer. Microsc. Soc. 97: 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, J. W. & Schlichting, H. E. 1966. Phyco-periphyton in an oligotrophic lake. Trans. Amer. Microsc. Soc. 84: 485–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, W. F., Gurzynski, A. J. & Lowe, R. L. 1979. Colonization and standing crops of epilithic algae in the Susquehanna River, Pennsylvania. J. Phycol. 15: 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumtow, R. B. 1955. An investigation of the periphyton in a riffle of the West Gallatin River, Montana. Trans. Amer. Microsc. Soc. 74: 278–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanic, L. A. & Pringle, J. D. 1978. Pottery, a substrate for algal culture. Br. Phycol. J. 13: 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, R., Hohn, M. H. & Wallace, J. H. 1954 A new method for determining the pattern of the diatom flora. Not. Nat. Acad. Nat. Sci. 259: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H. 1959. The Analysis of Variance. Wiley, New York. 477 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. 1949 The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 177 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siver, P. A. 1977. Comparison of attached diatom communities on natural and artifical substrates. J. Phycol. 13: 402–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladeckova, A. 1962. Limnological investigation methods for the periphyton (‘Aufwuchs’) community. The Botanical Review 28: 287–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. 573 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippett, R. 1970. Artificial surfaces as a method of studying populations of benthic algae in fresh water. Br. Phycol. J. 5: 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, M. L. & Blinn, D. W. 1979. Comparison of attached algal communities on natural and artificial substrates along a thermal gradient. Br. Phycol. J. 14: 243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G. 1964. A comparative study of the primary productivity of higher aquatic plants, periphyton, and phytoplankton in a large, shallow lake. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 49: 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tuchman, M.L., Stevenson, R.J. Comparison of clay tile, sterilized rock, and natural substrate diatom communities in a small stream in Southeastern Michigan, USA. Hydrobiologia 75, 73–79 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006564

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006564

Keywords

Navigation