Skip to main content
Log in

The foraging ecology of two sympatric gobiid fishes: importance of behavior in prey type selection

  • Full paper
  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

The foraging ecology of two temperate marine gobies (Pisces: Gobiidae) was studied in rocky subtidal habitats off Santa Catalina Island, California. The bluebanded goby, Lythrypnus dalli, foraged from exposed ledges and fed on planktonic and benthic prey, although planktonic prey were more important in diets by number and weight. The more cryptic zebra goby, Lythrypnus zebra, remained hidden under rocks and in crevices feeding on benthic prey almost exclusively. The active selection of particular prey taxa from the two prey sources (water column and substratum), mediated by species-specific differences in foraging behavior, resulted in interspecific differences in type, number, size and weight of prey consumed. Interspecific differences in foraging ecology reflect the selection of prey most readily available to these fishes that occupy specific and fixed microhabitats within rocky reefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Alevizon, W.S. 1975. Comparative feeding of a kelpbed embiotocid. Copeia 1975: 608–615.

  • Behrents, K.C. 1983. The comparative ecology and interactions between two sympatric gobies (Lythrypnus dali and Lythrypnus zebra). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 323 pp.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrents, K.C. 1987. The influence of shelter availability on recruitment and early juvenile survivorship of Lythrypnus dalli Gilbert (Pisces: Gobiidae). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 107: 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothers, E.B. 1975. The comparative ecology and behavior of three sympatric California gobies. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego. 370 pp.

  • Collins, S.P. 1981. Littoral and benthic investigations on the west coast of Ireland — XIII. The biology of Gobiusculus flavescens (Fabricius) on the Connemara Coast. Proc. Royal Irish Acad. 81: 63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S.P. 1982. Littoral and benthic investigations on the west coast of Ireland — XIV. The biology of the painted goby, Pontatoschistus pictus (Maim) (Teleostei: Gobiidae) on the Connemara Coast. Proc. Royal Irish Acad. 82: 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. 1980. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35: 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyer, J.A. 1979. The invertebrate assemblage associated with Macrocystis pyrifera and its utilization as a food resource by kelp forest fishes. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 364 pp.

  • Crow, M.E. 1981. Techniques for comparing the stomach contents of fish. pp. 8–15. In: C. Simenstad & G. Cailliet (ed.) Gutshop '80: Fish Food Habit Studies, Proc. 3rd Pacific Northwest Tech. Workshop, Washington Sea Grant Publ., University of Washington, Seattle.

  • Diamond, J.M. 1978. Niche shifts and rediscovery of interspecific competition. Amer. Scientist 66: 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J. 1978. Littoral and benthic investigations on the west coast of Ireland — IX. The biology of the rock-goby, Gobius paganellus L., at Carna. Proc. Royal Irish Acad. 78: 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, A.W. & R.N. Bray. 1976. Day versus night activity of reef fishes in a kelp forest off Santa Barbara, California. U.S. Fish. Bull. 74: 703–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, D.B. 1974. The systematics and biology of the blue-banded goby, Lythrypnus dalli (Teleostei: Gobiidae), in southern California. M.S. Thesis, Occidental College, Pasadena. 117 pp.

  • Ellison, J.P., C. Terry & J.S. Stephens Jr. 1979. Food resource utilization among five species of embiotocids at King Harbor, California, with preliminary estimates of caloric intake. Mar. Biol. 52: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estabrook, G.F. & A.E. Dunham. 1976. Optimal diet as a function of absolute abundance, relative abundance, and relative value of available prey. Amer. Nat. 110: 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.D. 1980. Ecological aspects of ontogenetic shifts in prey size utilization in the bay goby (Pisces: Gobiidae). Oecologia 47: 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.D., R. Coffin & P.B. Moyle. 1980. Feeding ecology of the bay goby (Pisces: Gobiidae). Effects of behavioral, ontogenetic, and temporal variation on diet. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 44: 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldorson, L. & M. Moser. 1979. Geographic patterns of prey utilization in two species of surfperch (Embiotocidae). Copeia 1979: 567–572.

  • Healy, M.C. 1971. The distribution and abundance of sand gobies, Gobius minutus, in the Ythan estuary. J. Zool. Lond. 163: 177–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, M.C. 1972. On the population ecology of the common goby in the Ythan estuary. J. Nat. Hist. 6: 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesthagen, I.H. 1977. Migrations, breeding, and growth in Pomatoschistus minutus (Pallas) (Pisces: Gobiidae) in Oslofjorden, Norway. Sarsia 63: 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon, M.A. 1980. Competitive interactions between California reef fishes of the genus Embiotoca. Ecology 61: 918–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, E.S. 1972. Activity of Hawaiian reef fishes during the evening and morning transitions between daylight and darkness. U.S. Fish. Bull. 70: 715–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, E.S. & J.R. Chess. 1976. Trophic interactions among fishes and zooplankters near shore at Santa Catalina Island, California. U.S. Fish. Bull. 74: 567–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, E.S., W.N. McFarland & J.R. Chess. 1981. Crepuscular and nocturnal activities of Californian nearshore fishes, with consideration of their scotopic visual pigments and the photic environment. U.S. Fish. Bull. 79: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, S.J., R.J. Schmitt & J.A. Coyer, 1985. Age related dietary patterns of sympatric adult surfperch. Copeia 1985: 986–994.

  • Hubbs, C.L. & K.F. Lagler. 1964. Fishes of the Great Lakes regions. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. 213 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivlev, V.S. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New Haven. 302 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A. & D. Webb. 1966. Mouth and body form relative to feeding ecology in the fish fauna of a small lake, Lake Opinicon, Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 23: 1845–1874.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Harper and Row, New York. 269 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPherson, E. 1979. Ecological overlap between Macrourids in the western Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Biol. 53: 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.J. & R.N. Lea. 1976. Guide to the coastal marine fishes of California. Calif. Dep. Fish Game, Fish Bull. 157: 1–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N.A. 1978. The role of size biased predation in competition and interactive segregation in fish. pp. 303–325. In: S.D. Gerking (ed.) Ecology of Freshwater Fish Production, Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearre, S. 1982. Estimating prey preference by predators: uses of various indices, and a proposal of another based on Chi Square. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 914–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, R.H. 1975. Diet optimization with nutrient constraints. Amer. Nat. 109: 765–l768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.T. 1977. Patterns of resource partitioning in searobins (Pisces: Triglidae). Copeia 1977: 561–571.

  • Schmitt, R.J. & J.A. Coyer. 1982. The foraging ecology of sympatric marine fish in the genus Embiotoca (Embiotocidae): Importance of foraging behavior in prey size selection. Oecologia 55: 369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 859 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, G.W., W.E. Schaaf, J.W. Angelovic & M.W. Lacroix. 1973. Caloric measurements of some estuarine organisms. U.S. Fish. Bull. 71: 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B.W. 1961. The ecology of the Salton Sea, California, in relation to sport fishery. Calif. Dep. Fish Game, Fish Bull. 113: 1–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. 1974. The fish size, prey size, handling time relation in several sunfishes and some implications. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 31: 1531–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. 1977. Species packing and niche complementarity in three sunfishes. Amer. Nat. 111: 553–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. & D.J. Hall. 1976. Niche shifts in sunfishes: experimental evidence and significance. Science 191: 404–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. & D.J. Hall. 1977. Competition and habitat shift in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 58: 869–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. & D.J. Hall. 1979. Foraging efficiency and habitat switching in competing sunfishes. Ecology 60: 256–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J.W. 1973. Life history of the western North American goby, Coryphopterus nicholsii (Bean). Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 17: 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J.W. 1976. Life histories and systematics of the western North American gobies Lythrypnus dalli (Gilbert) and Lythrypnus zebra (Gilbert). Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 18: 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, T.M. & A.S. Rand. 1971. Competition in tropical stream fishes: support for the competitive exclusion principle. Ecology 52: 336–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartney, K.B. The foraging ecology of two sympatric gobiid fishes: importance of behavior in prey type selection. Environ Biol Fish 26, 105–118 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001027

Key words

Navigation