Abstract
Most of the world’s microbial diversity is comprised of culture-independent microorganisms. In the natural environment, 99% of microbes are unculturable, which means that only 1% of microbes are capable of being cultured in a laboratory setting. Consequently, it is necessary to develop culture-independent approaches for the identification and characterization of such microbes and the evaluation of the role they play in the environment. Metagenomics, metaproteomics, etc. technologies are being developed to tackle new challenges and provide alternatives to traditional microbiology. Metagenomics focuses on the genetic and evolutionary relationship, microbial diversity, functional activities, and interaction with varied environments. Similarly, metaproteomics focuses on the protein composition of a complex sample as well as helps in the identification and quantification of protein. Also, metaproteomics detects proteins at a posttranslational level that gives a broader idea of the protein’s function. In this chapter, new developments in techniques like Oxford Nanopore sequencing with advanced bioinformatics tools, metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), and new techniques for the isolation, identification, and characterization of microbes from different environments will be discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- BLAST:
-
Basic local alignment search tool
- DNA:
-
Deoxyribonucleic acid
- EggNOG:
-
Evolutionary genealogy of genes non-supervised orthologous groups
- ESI:
-
Electrospray ionization
- HPLC:
-
High-performance liquid chromatography
- KEGG:
-
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
- LAST:
-
Local alignment search tool
- LC-MS:
-
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
- MAGs:
-
Metagenome-assembled genomes
- MALDI-TOF:
-
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry
- MAP:
-
MinION Access Program
- MS:
-
Mass spectrometry
- MudPIT:
-
Multidimensional protein identification technology
- NCBI:
-
National Center for Biotechnology Information
- NGS:
-
Next-generation sequencing
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- qRT-PCR:
-
Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
- SAGs:
-
Single amplified genomes
- SCX:
-
Strong cation exchange column
- SDS-PAGE:
-
Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
- SMRT:
-
Single-molecule real time
- ZMW:
-
Zero-mode waveguide
References
Ashton PM, Nair S, Dallman T et al (2015) MinION nanopore sequencing identifies the position and structure of a bacterial antibiotic resistance island. Nat Biotechnol 33:296–302
Fenn JB, Mann M, Meng CK et al (1990) ChemInform abstract: electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. ChemInform 246(4926):64–71
Frith MC, Hamada M, Horton P (2010) Parameters for accurate genome alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 11(1):1–14
Geer LY, Markey SP, Kowalak JA et al (2004) Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J Proteome Res 3:958–964
Goodwin S, McPherson JD, McCombie WR (2016) Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet 17:333–351
Graham C, McMullan G, Graham RLJ (2011) Proteomics in the microbial sciences. Bioeng Bugs 2:17–30
Greninger AL, Naccache SN, Federman S et al (2015) Rapid metagenomic identification of viral pathogens in clinical samples by real-time nanopore sequencing analysis. Genome Med 7:1–13
Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A et al (2018) RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D851–D860
Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A et al (2004) The gene oncology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 32:258–261
Heyer R, Schallert K, Zoun R et al (2017) Challenges and perspectives of metaproteomic data analysis. J Biotechnol 261:24–36
Hillenkamp F, Karas M (1990) Mass spectrometry of peptides and proteins by matrix-assisted ultraviolet laser desorption/ionization. Methods Enzymol 193:280–295
Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D et al (2019) EggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D309–D314
Issa Isaac N, Philippe D, Nicholas A et al (2019) Metaproteomics of the human gut microbiota: challenges and contributions to other OMICS. Clin Mass Spectrom 14:18–30
Josic D, Kovac S (2010) Reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography of proteins. Curr Protoc Protein Sci 2010:1–22
Kleiner M (2019) Metaproteomics: much more than measuring gene expression in microbial communities. mSystems 4(3):e00115–e00119
Kleiner M, Thorson E, Sharp CE et al (2017) Assessing species biomass contributions in microbial communities via metaproteomics. Nat Commun 8(1):1–14
Ko KKK, Chng KR, Nagarajan N (2022) Metagenomics-enabled microbial surveillance. Nat Microbiol 7:486–496
Li N, Cai Q, Miao Q et al (2021) High-throughput metagenomics for identification of pathogens in the clinical settings. Small Methods 5:1–27
Liu S, Moon CD, Zheng N et al (2022) Opportunities and challenges of using metagenomic data to bring uncultured microbes into cultivation. Microbiome 10:1–14
Moss EL, Maghini DG, Bhatt AS (2020) Complete, closed bacterial genomes from microbiomes using nanopore sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 38:701–707
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT et al (2015) CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055
Quick J, Ashton P, Calus S et al (2015) Rapid draft sequencing and real-time nanopore sequencing in a hospital outbreak of Salmonella. Genome Biol 16(1):1–14
Raza S, Ameen A (2017) International journal of advances in scientific research metaproteomics approaches and techniques: a review. Int J Adv Sci Res 3:49–51
Sachsenberg T, Herbst FA, Taubert M et al (2015) MetaProSIP: automated inference of stable isotope incorporation rates in proteins for functional metaproteomics. J Proteome Res 14:619–627
Tanca A, Palomba A, Pisanu S et al (2015) Enrichment or depletion? The impact of stool pretreatment on metaproteomic characterization of the human gut microbiota. Proteomics 15:3474–3485
Tyson GW, Chapman J, Hugenholtz P et al (2004) Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature 428:37–43
Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF et al (2004) Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304(5667):66–74
Vizca JA, Csordas A, Griss J et al (2016) Erratum: 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools (Nucleic Acids Research (2016) 44:D1 D447-D456)
White RA, Bottos EM, Roy Chowdhury T et al (2016) Moleculo long-read sequencing facilitates assembly and genomic binning from complex soil metagenomes. mSystems 1:1–15
Yu X, Jiang W, Shi Y et al (2019) Applications of sequencing technology in clinical microbial infection. J Cell Mol Med 23:7143–7150
Zhang L, Chen FX, Zeng Z et al (2021) Advances in metagenomics and its application in environmental microorganisms. Front Microbiol 12:1–15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shah, K., Upadhye, V.J., Shrivastav, A. (2023). New Developments in Techniques Like Metagenomics and Metaproteomics for Isolation, Identification, and Characterization of Microbes from Varied Environment. In: Mathur, P., Kapoor, R., Roy, S. (eds) Microbial Symbionts and Plant Health: Trends and Applications for Changing Climate. Rhizosphere Biology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0030-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0030-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0029-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0030-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)