Skip to main content

Adaption of Smart Devices and Virtual Reality (VR) in Secondary Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Learning for Computer Vision (CIS 2020)

Abstract

Learning is an essential process for all individual spans from cradle to graveyard. Biology is one of the subjects where most of the students have been facing difficulties to study and memorize its content due to its complicated environment and structures. The effective education to the students is necessary, and it could be achieved by adopting of new technological concepts and application to their syllabi. Virtual reality is one of the outstanding modes to the students to learn and memorize the subject quickly. In this research, quantitative and qualitative methods were used to determine the factors of adaption of smart devices and virtual reality (VR) in secondary education with a pretest–posttest group. Additionally, the reliability of the collected data was analyzed with Cronbach’s alpha test. Two hundred students from ten schools were randomly selected for the pretest while 100 were selected for the posttest among these 200 students; where these 100 students allowed to use VR technology for their educational purposes, and these samples were selected using a stratified random sampling technique. In conclusion, the research shows that the performance of the students who used the VR tool in their studies was significantly increased; male students are very fond of technology and tools, thus score more marks compare with female students. At the meantime, female students are needed to be trained (to use the VR system) more in order to learn the subjects. Also, it is suggested to introduce this VR system to all the other subjects with proper training to both students and teachers not only education sector but also in various domain where the training is essential part to the employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mwangu EC, Sibanda L (2017) Teaching biology practical lessons in secondary schools: a case study of five Mzilikazi district secondary schools in Bulawayo Metropolitan Province, Zimbabwe. Acad J Interdisc Stud 6(3):47–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/ajis-2017-0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brivio E, Serino S, Negro Cousa E, Zini A, Riva G, De Leo G (2020) Virtual reality and 360° panorama technology: a media comparison to study changes in sense of presence, anxiety, and positive emotions. Virtual Reality 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00453-7

  3. Gervasi O, Ranon R (2009) Foreword: guest editors’ foreword to the special issue on virtual reality in scientific application. Virtual Reality 13(4):219–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-009-0139-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alfalah SFM, Falah JFM, Alfalah T, Elfalah M, Muhaidat N, Falah O (2019) A comparative study between a virtual reality heart anatomy system and traditional medical teaching modalities. Virtual Reality 23(3):229–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0359-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards BI, Bielawski KS, Prada R, Cheok AD (2019) Haptic virtual reality and immersive learning for enhanced organic chemistry instruction. Virtual Reality 23(4):363–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0345-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy CJ, Uppot RN (2019) Advances in virtual and augmented reality—exploring the role in health-care education. J Radiol Nurs 38(2):104–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jradnu.2019.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leighton LJ, Crompton H (2017) Augmented reality in K-12 education. In: Mobile technologies and augmented reality in open education. IGI Global, pp 281–290

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elmqaddem N (2019) Augmented reality and virtual reality in education. Myth or reality? Int J Emerg Technol Learn 14(3):234–242. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee K (2012) Augmented reality in education and training. TechTrends 56(2):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0559-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lamb R, Antonenko P, Etopio E, Seccia A (2018) Comparison of virtual reality and hands on activities in science education via functional near infrared spectroscopy. Comput Educ 124:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dávideková M, Mjartan M, Greguš M (2017) Utilization of virtual reality in education of employees in Slovakia. Procedia Comput Sci 113:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Andevski M, Vidaković M, Arsenijević O (2014) Internet u nastavi i učenju. ImpaCt Internet Bus. Act. SerBIa Worldw., p 368

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arnold PL (2015) Rural high school faculty perspectives on bring your own device implementation: a phenomenological study. Liberty University

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hussein M, Nätterdal C (2015) The benefits of virtual reality in education—a comparison study

    Google Scholar 

  15. Argles T, Minocha S, Burden D (2015) Virtual field teaching has evolved: benefits of a 3D gaming environment. Geol Today 31(6):222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mikropoulos TA, Natsis A (2011) Educational virtual environments: a ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Comput Educ 56(3):769–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Serin H (2020) Virtual reality in education from the perspective of teachers. Rev Amazonia Investiga 9(26):291–303. https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2020.26.02.33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Serin H (2015) The role of technology in whole-class teaching. Int J Soc Sci Educ Stud 2(1):25–27

    Google Scholar 

  19. Serin H, Oz Y (2017) Technology-integrated mathematics education at the secondary school level. Int J Soc Sci Educ Stud 3(4):148

    Google Scholar 

  20. Labovitz J, Hubbard C (2020) The use of virtual reality in podiatric medical education. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 37(2):409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2019.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Minocha S, Tudor AD, Tilling S (2017) Affordances of mobile virtual reality and their role in learning and teaching. In: HCI 2017: digital make believe—proceedings of the 31st international BCS human computer interaction conference, HCI 2017, vol 2017, July. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.44

  22. Baragash RS, Al-Samarraie H, Moody L, Zaqout F (2020) augmented reality and functional skills acquisition among individuals with special needs: a meta-analysis of group design studies. J Spec Educ Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420910413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sung Y-T, Chang K-E, Liu T-C (2016) The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis and research synthesis. Comput Educ 94:252–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Razeeth MSS, Kariapper R, Pirapuraj P, Nafrees ACM, Rishan UM, Nusrath Ali S (2019) E-learning at home vs traditional learning among higher education students: a survey-based analysis. In: TRInCo 2019, 4th annual research conference

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stojšić I, Džigurski AI, Maričić O, Bibić LI, Vučković SD (2016) Possible application of virtual reality in geography teaching. J Subj Didactics 1(2):83–96

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kavanagh S, Luxton-Reilly A, Wuensche B, Plimmer B (2017) A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes Sci Technol Educ 10(2):85–119

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fishbein M (1979) A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications

    Google Scholar 

  28. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (2008) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 35(8):982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wahid F (2017) Using the technology adoption model to analyze internet adoption and use among men and women in Indonesia. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Countries 32(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2007.tb00225.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Davis FD (1993) User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud 38(3):475–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. K. A. R. Kariapper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kariapper, R.K.A.R., Pirapuraj, P., Suhail Razeeth, M.S., Nafrees, A.C.M., Fathima Roshan, M. (2021). Adaption of Smart Devices and Virtual Reality (VR) in Secondary Education. In: Sharma, H., Saraswat, M., Kumar, S., Bansal, J.C. (eds) Intelligent Learning for Computer Vision. CIS 2020. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 61. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4582-9_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics