Skip to main content

Global Social Contract Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Development of Global Legislative Politics

Part of the book series: Trust ((TRUST,volume 3))

Abstract

This chapter describes the nature and potentials of Rousseau’s and Locke’s social contract theories to be reformulated as global social contract theory. Despite their limits attributed to the seventeenth and eighteenth century western Europe where they lived their lives like Rousseau’s geo-cultural exclusion of Mediterranean and eastern Europe and Locke’s socio-religious exclusion of those without status and piety, we summarize those subsequent democratic developments in Rosseauesque direct democracy driven by empathy and compassion and in Lockean representative democracy driven by human reasoning and pragmatism. Citing Immanuel Kant’s Eternal Peace in comparing the year of 1912 when Norman Angell expressed optimism on the basis of free trade-derived peace and prosperity and the year of 2019 when international organizations, democracy and free trade have reached their peaks and the beginnings of a stall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, K., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (Eds.). (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, K., Green, J., & Keohane, R. (2016). Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization, 70(2), 247–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achen, C., & Bartels, L. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsible government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Angell, N. (1912). The great illusion: A study of the relation of military power to national advantage, paperback edition. New York: Bottom of the Hill Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azuma, H. (2014). General Will 2.0: Rousseau, Freud, Google, New York: Vertical.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badie, B. (2000). The imported state: The westernization of the political order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (2004). The death of communal liberty: A history of freedom in a Swiss Mountain Canton. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (2014). If mayors ruled the world: dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I. (1996). The new challenge of direct democracy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (2006). A preface to democratic theory, expanded edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R., & Welzel, C. eds. (2015). The civic culture transformed: From allegiance to assertive citizens. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, D., & le Rond d’Alembert, J. (1751–1772). Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire Raisonné des Sciences, des Arts et des Métiers (Vol. 28). Sydney: Wentworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (2005). Setting the people free: The story of democracy. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J., & Williams, D. L. (Eds.). (2015). The general will: The evolution of a concept. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R. (2002). Home style: House members in their districts. New York: Pearson; Longman Classics edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (2010). The interpretation of dreams: The complete and definitive text. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorescu, A., & Baser, C. (2019). The choice between intergovernmentalism and nongovernmentalism: Projecting domestic preferences to global governance. World Politics, 71(1), 88–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (2014). Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1st edition of Clarendon Edition of the Works of Thomas Hobbes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoguchi, T. (2017, January 27). Non-US and US citizens’ polling in US presidential election 2016: A hierarchical Bayesian model. In Paper prepared for the conference organized by Asian journal of comparative politics (SAGE publications). Tokyo: International House of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoguchi, T., & Le, L. T. Q. (2016). Toward modelling a global social contract: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 17(03), 489–522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109916000207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, P. (forthcoming). Asian subnational governance in foreign affairs. In T. Inoguchi (Ed.), The Sage handbook of Asian foreign policy, Vol. 1, Chapter 16. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesper, K. (2019). “Japan is back as a top global contender.” The Japan Times, Feb. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, H., & Almeida, P. (Eds.). (2006). Latin American social movements: Globalization, democratization, and transnational networks. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2013). Eternal peace and other internal essays. New York: The Classicus.us.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2009). The life and death of democracy. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Lavenex, S., Esser, F., Matthes, J., Bühlmann, M., & Bochsler, D. (2013). Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le, T. Q. L., Mikami, Y., & Inoguchi, T. (2014). Global leadership and international regime: Empirical testing of cooperation without hegemonic paradigm on the basis of 120 multilateral conventions deposited to the United Nations System. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 15(4), 523–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1993). Two treaties of government. New York: Everyman Paperback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of Western democracy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S., Saafeld, T., & Strøm, K. (2016). The Oxford handbook of legislative studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuno, K. (2014). Shihonshugi no Shuen to Rekishino Kiki (The end of capitalism and the crisis of history). Tokyo: PHP Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, W., & Brown, S. (1990). Ockham-philosophical writings: A solution. New York: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, E., & Newstadt, R. (2001). The dance of legislation: An insider’s account of the workings of the United States Senate. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J., & Cranston, M. (1968). The social contract. London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B. M., & Oneal, J. (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shkler, J. (1973). General will. In P. Wiener (Ed.), Dictionary of the history of ideas (p. 275). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jonsson, C. (2013). The opening up of international organizations: Transnational access in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2016a). “Caste in India: Backward ho!” February 27–March 4, pp. 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2016b). “How to win friends and influence people” April 9–15, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, L. (2002). Democratization: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • WIN-Gallup International. (2016). Global poll on the American election: Region-wise results, demographics-wise results and U.S. results, Vienna: WIN-Gallup International.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Inoguchi, T., Le, L.T.Q. (2020). Global Social Contract Theory. In: The Development of Global Legislative Politics. Trust, vol 3. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9389-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9389-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9388-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9389-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics