Synonyms
Ethics of care; Gilligan; Kant; Kohlberg; Philosophy of education; Theories of moral development
The American psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg (1927–1987) is a modern classic in the fields of moral social psychology and theory of a moral development. His cognitivistic theory of moral development has become a paradigm in the psychology of education. Students of teaching and education in many countries have been taught that there are six universal developmental modes (stages or schemas) of moral thinking, which are an empirical fact verified by Kohlberg and his followers in hundreds of empirical studies. Thus, the Kohlberg theory must be true because it is empirically verified. Nevertheless, one might ask can there be empirical proof on transcendental (philosophical) theory of morality and its development. Jürgen Habermas was the first to note that Kohlberg’s theory of moral stages is a kind of rational reconstruction and that, as such, it cannot be empirically verified or...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Habermas, J. (1995). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: Polity.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1906). Das Leben Jesu. Jena: Eugen Diederichs. Retrieved from http://ia301530.us.archive.org/3/items/lebenjesuharmoni00hege/lebenjesuharmoni00hege.pdf.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1979). System of ethical life and first philosophy of spirit. New York: State University of New York Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2001). Philosophy of right. Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/prindex.htm.
Hume, D. (2004). A treatise of human nature. Retrieved from http://files.libertyfund.org/files/342/0213_Bk.pdf.
Hutcheson, F. (2004). An inquiry into the original of our ideas of beauty and virtue [1726]. Retrieved from http://files.libertyfund.org/files/858/Hutcheson_0449_EBk_v4.pdf.
Kant, I. (1971). Prolegomena to any future metaphysic that will be able to present itself as a science. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
Kant, I. (1996). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork of metaphysic of morals. In L. Pasternack (Ed.), Immanuel Kant: Groundwork the metaphysic of moral in focus. London: Routledge.
Kant, I. (2007). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2015). On education. Retrieved from http://ziveuniverzity.sk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Kant-On-Education.pdf.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development (The philosophy of moral development, moral stages and the idea of justice, Vol. I). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
Kontio, K. (2003). The idea of autarchy in Rousseau’s natural education: Recovering the natural harmony? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 3–19.
Lähde, V. (2008). Rousseau’s rhetoric of “nature”. Tampere: Tampere University Press. Retrieved from http://www.villelahde.fi/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Rousseaus_Rhetoric_of_Nature.pdf.
Mandeville, B. (2004). The fable of the bees: Or, private vices, publick benefits, Vol. 1 Retrieved from http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2462.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2016a). A discourse on the sciences and arts. Retrieved from https://webmasters.byuh.edu/faculty/troysmith/BYUH/Classes/Philosophy/Rousseau%20–%20First%20Discourse.pdf.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2016b). Discourse on inequality. Retrieved from https://www.aub.edu.lb/fas/cvsp/Documents/DiscourseonInequality.pdf879500092.pdf.
Shaftesbury [Anthony Ashley Cooper]. (2004). An inquiry concerning virtue or merit. Retrieved from http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/shaftesbury1711book1.pdf.
Siegel, H. (1986). On using psychology to justify judgments of moral adequacy. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg – consensus and controversy (pp. 65–78). East Sussex, UK: The Falmer Press.
Smith, A. (1973). The wealth of nations. Suffolk, UK: Penguin.
Smith, A. (1976). The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Huttunen, R., Kakkori, L. (2017). Philosophical Roots of Gilligan-Kohlberg Controversy, The. In: Peters, M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_416
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_416
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-587-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-588-4
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education