Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Effective Investigation on YIPe-Learning Based for Twenty-First Century Class

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Learning based Education

Part of the book series: Advanced Technologies and Societal Change ((ATSC))

Abstract

Every system was jolted and altered by the arrival of COVID-19. All students and lecturers had to keep practicing physical distancing and social distancing by learning at home. Moreover, learning and teaching must be delivered through media and technology instruction. So, all the classes were carried out internet and using Socmed-learning based. The limitations of online learning are the lack of interaction, engagement, interest in learning, unclear instructions, and the presentation of boring material. Therefore, it takes the preparation of interesting and varied teaching materials online. The purpose of this paper is to examine the benefits of using Youtube, Instagram, and Pinterest (YIPe-learning based) as teaching content. Due to the fact that not all lecturers use Socmed (social media) as content-based teaching materials, This study was conducted quantitatively, followed by qualitatively, i.e., a mixed-method approach, which involved handing out questionnaires to students after they'd used the apps in the classroom. The data was collected from 42 students in Indonesia. The results show that students' questionnaire responses highly accepted YIPe-learning based on their learning outcomes and affected students' learning performance when incorporating media and technology in the middle of the pandemic era. This study shows that combining YIPe as teaching materials is beneficial in teaching digitarian students and the implications were made for enhancing university lecturer pedagogical reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snelbecker, G.E., Miller, S.M., Zheng, R.Z.: Functional relevance and online instructional design. In: Understanding Online İnstructional Modeling: theories and Practices, pp. 1–17. IGI Global (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng, R.Z., Ferris, S.P. (eds.): Understanding Online Instructional Modeling: theories and Practices: theories and Practices. IGI Global (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Czerkawski, B.C., Lyman, E.W.: An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends 60(6), 532–539 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, L.L.: A model for effective online instructional design. Lit. Inf. Comput. Educ. J. 6(2), 2303–2308 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Sgouropoulou, C.: A novel teaching strategy through adaptive learning activities for computer programming. IEEE Trans. Educ. 64(2), 103–109 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Almaiah, M.A., Al-Khasawneh, A., Althunibat, A.: Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(6), 5261–5280 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shohel, M.M.C., Shams, S., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Alam, A.S., Al Mamun, M.A., Kabir, M.M.: Emergency remote teaching and learning: digital competencies and pedagogical transformation in resource-constrained contexts. In: Handbook of Research on Asian Perspectives of the Educational Impact of COVID-19, pp. 175–200. IGI Global (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., Guzzo, T.: Online learning and emergency remote teaching: opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies 10(4), 86 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R.E., McKee, A.: Primal Leadership: unleashing the Power of Emotional İntelligence. Harvard Business Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. DePorter, B., Hernacki, M.: Quantum Learning: unleashing the Genius in You. Dell (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Panisoara, I.O., Lazar, I., Panisoara, G., Chirca, R., Ursu, A.S.: Motivation and continuance intention towards online instruction among teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: the mediating efect of burnout and technostress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(21), 8002 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tawafak, R., AlFarsi, G., Jabbar, J., Malik, S.I., Mathew, R., AlSidiri, A., et al.: Impact of technologies during COVID-19 pandemic for ımproving behavior ıntention to use e-learning. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. (iJIM) 15(1), 184–198 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hernández-García, Á., Chaparro-Peláez, J., Prieto, J.L.: Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 119, 106713 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Agarwal, A., Sharma, S., Kumar, V., Kaur, M.: Efect of E-learning on public health and environment during COVID-19 lockdown. Big Data Mining Anal. 4(2), 104–115 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K.S., Jha, G.K.: Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open 3(1), 100101 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tawfik, A.A., Gatewood, J., Gish-Lieberman, J.J., Hampton, A.J.: Toward a definition of learning experience design. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 2021, 1–26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09482-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vargo, D., Zhu, L., Benwell, B., Yan, Z.: Digital technology use during COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 3(1), 13–24 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Amir, S., Kamal, M.S., Shahria, M.T., Iftekhar, L.: Facebook’s social learning group for undergraduate engineering courses: a case study of emergency remote teaching amid large digital divide. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), pp. 235–242 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xie, Y., Qiu, Y., Huang, Y., Li, J., Liu, Y., Wu, J.: The construction and efect of the MOOCbased one plus three teaching model during the COVID-19 pandemic. In: 2020 Ninth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), pp. 199–20 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ionescu, C.A., Paschia, L., Gudanescu Nicolau, N.L., Stanescu, S.G., Neacsu Stancescu, V.M., Coman, M.D., Uzlau, M.C.: Sustainability analysis of the E-learning education system during pandemic period—COVID-19 in Romania. Sustainability 12(21), 9030 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodríguez-Peñarroja, M.: Integrating project-based learning, task-based language teaching approach and YouTube in the ESP class: a study on students’ motivation. Teach. Engl. Technol. 22(1), 62–81 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trang, N.M.: Using YouTube videos to enhance learner autonomy in writing: a qualitative research design. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud. 12(1), 36–45 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Helingo, A.: YouTube as learning medium for promoting EFL students’ reading habit and motivation. J. Engl. Lang. Educ. 7(1), 28–34 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alsuwaida, N.: Designing and evaluating the ımpact of using a blended art course and web 2.0 tools in Saudi Arabia. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 21, 25 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lim, M.S., Molenaar, A., Brennan, L., Reid, M., McCaffrey, T.: Young adults’ use of different social media platforms for health information: insights from web-based conversations. J. Med. Internet Res. 24(1), e23656 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Adeshola, I., Agoyi, M.: Examining factors influencing e-learning engagement among university students during covid-19 pandemic: a mediating role of “learning persistence”. Interact. Learn. Environ. 1–28 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Casimiro, L.T.: Cognitive engagement in online intercultural interactions: beyond analytics. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 6(6), 441–447 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dick, W., Carey, L., Carey, J.O.: The Systematic Design of Instruction, 8th edn. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Haynie, D.: Experts debate graduation rates for online students. US News: Education (2015). http://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/2015/01/30/experts-debate-graduation-rates-for-online-students

  30. Willging, P.A., Johnson, S.A.: Factors that influence students’ decision to drop out of online courses. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 8(4), 105–118 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cloonan, M., Fingeret, A.L.: Developing teaching materials for learners in surgery. Surgery 167(4), 689–692 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wasson, B., Kirschner, P.A.: Learning design: European approaches. TechTrends 64(6), 815–827 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00498-0

  33. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: design and Methods, 3rd edn. Sage (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Young, C., Perović, N.: Rapid and creative course design: as easy as ABC? Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 228, 390–395 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro

  35. Adnan, N.H., Ritzhaupt, A.D.: Software engineering design principles applied to instructional design: what can we learn from our sister discipline? TechTrends 62(1), 77–94 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0238-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bates, A.W.: Teaching in a Digital Age, 2nd edn. Tony Bates Associates Ltd., (2019). https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev2/

  37. Bridwell-Mitchell, E.N.: The rationalizing logics of public school reform: how cultural institutions matter for classroom instruction. J. Mixed Methods Res. 7(2), 173–196 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812468792

  38. Shuayb, M.: Appreciative inquiry as a method for participatory change in secondary schools in Lebanon. J. Mixed Methods Res. 8(3), 299–307 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Whatley, M., tich, A.E.: Pushing the integration envelope: a network analysis of study abroad website content. J. Mixed Methods Res. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211015450

  40. Chen, L.: Pedagogically effective online ınstructional design model. Lit. Inf. Comput. Educ. J. 6(2), 2303–2308 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cheung, L.: Using the ADDIE model of ınstructional design to teach chest radiograph ınterpretation. J. Biomed. Educ. 1–6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dick, W., Carey, L., Carey, J.O.: The Systematic Design of İnstruction, 8th edn, p. 2014. New Jersey Pearson Education Inc., (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bowser, A., Davis, K., Singleton, J., Small, T.: Professional learning: a collaborative model for online teaching and development. SRATE J. 26(1), 1–8 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mayer, R.H.: Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models: new Paradigm of Instructional Theory, vol. 2, pp. 141–159. NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Garrison, D.R.: Self-directed learning : toward a comprehensive model, no. November 1997 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zaharias, P., Vassilopoulou, K., Poulymenakou, A.: Designing on-line learning courses: ımplications for usability

    Google Scholar 

  47. Branch, R.M., & Kopcha, T.J.: Instructional design models. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 77–87). Springer, New York, NY. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Muthmainnah, A.R., Atmowardoyo, H., Salija, K., Asrifan, A.: Literary work as teaching materials: a study of students and lecturers needs analysis. Solid State Technol. 63(5), 394–407 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Diseth, Å., Danielsen, A.G., Samdal, O.: A path analysis of basic need support, self-efficacy, achievement goals, life satisfaction and academic achievement level among secondary school students. Educ. Psychol. 32(3), 335–354 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Muthmainnah, N.A., Galal, M., Varghese, K.J., Del Castillo, F., Ghofur, A.: The students’ needs ın developıng EFL materıals ICT based. OKARA 15(2), 235 (Statistik Deskriptif) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Svihla, V.: Design thinking and agile design: new trends or just good designs? In: West, R.E. (ed.): Foundations of Learning and İnstructional Design Technology. EdTech Books (2017). https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/design_thinking_and_agile_design

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Teacher Training and Education Faculty Indonesian Language Study Program, Universitas Al Asyariah Mandar, Polewali Mandar, Indonesia

    Muthmainnah

  2. Department of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, 147004, India

    Souvik Ganguli

  3. Teacher Training and Education Faculty Civic Education Study Program, Universitas Al Asyariah Mandar, Polewali Mandar, Indonesia

    Ahmad Al Yakin

  4. Teacher Training and Education Faculty English Language Study Program, IAIN Madura, Pamekasan, Indonesia

    Abd. Ghofur

Authors
  1. Muthmainnah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Souvik Ganguli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmad Al Yakin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abd. Ghofur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muthmainnah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

    Amitava Choudhury

  2. School of Mines and Metallurgy, Kazi Nazrul University, Asansol, West Bengal, India

    Arindam Biswas

  3. Kazi Nazrul University, Asansol, India

    Sadhan Chakraborti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Muthmainnah, Ganguli, S., Al Yakin, A., Abd. Ghofur (2023). An Effective Investigation on YIPe-Learning Based for Twenty-First Century Class. In: Choudhury, A., Biswas, A., Chakraborti, S. (eds) Digital Learning based Education. Advanced Technologies and Societal Change. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8967-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8967-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8966-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8967-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation