Abstract
Over the last one and a half decades, some fundamental changes have occurred in social research, and the renewed emphasis on ensuring ethical standards at every step of the research process constitutes one of such changes. The purpose of the discussion here is to shed light on the fundamental steps and issues concerning research ethics—as commonly encountered, especially by early career researchers and research students—and highlight the fact that ethics constitutes an essential element in maintaining the quality of research. The chapter focuses on the primary stages, methodology, and procedures of ethical protections that the modern social research institution has established to protect study participants’ rights and privacy. Keeping the participant anonymous throughout the research process is one of the fundamental principles of research ethics. Another important ethical consideration concerns the hierarchies between researchers and participants (respondents); one implication is that research participants may not be coerced into participating in research anymore. They have the liberty to withdraw from the study at any time. Depending on the level of (physical, psychological, political, and financial) sensitivity, the matter of ethical approval for a particular research project has to go through various levels of the ethical screening process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amdur, R. & Bankert, E. A. (2011). Institutional review board member handbook. Jones and Bartlett.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12).
American University. (2016). IRB. American University.
Angell, E., et al. (2006). Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: A controlled comparison. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(11), 662–664.
Barbour, R. S. (2000). The role of qualitative research in broadening the ‘evidence base’ for clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 6(2), 155–163.
Burkhardt, M. A., Walton, N., & Nathaniel, A. (2014). Ethics and Issues in contemporary nursing. Nelson.
Burman, W., et al. (2003). The effects of local review on informed consent documents from a multi-center clinical trials consortium. Controlled Clinical Trials, 24(3), 245–255.
Burns, E., Fenwick, J., Schmied, V., & Sheenan, A. (2012). Reflexivity in midwifery research: The insider/outsider debate. Midwifery, 28(1), 52–60.
Candilis, P. J., et al. (2006). The need to understand IRB deliberations. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 28(1), 1–5.
Chetty, P. (2016). Importance of ethical considerations in research. https://www.projectguru.in/importance-ethical-considerations-research/
Colt, H. G., & Mulnard, R. A. (2006). Writing an application for a human subjects institutional review board. Chest, 130(5), 1605–1607.
Dyrbye, L. N., et al. (2007). Medical education research and IRB review: An analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions. Academic Medicine, 82(7), 654–660.
Emanuel, E., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical? Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(20), 2701–2711.
Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5738.
Fitzgerald, M. H., & Phillips, P. A. (2006). Centralized and non-centralized ethics review: A five-nation study. Accountability in Research, 13(1), 47–74.
Gajjar, N. B. (2013). Ethical consideration in research. International Journal for Research in Education, 2(7).
Grady, C. (2002). Ethical principles of research. In J. I. Gallin & F. P. Ognibene (Eds.), Principles and practice of clinical research (pp. 15–27). Academic Press.
Gunsalus, C. K., et al. (2007). The Illinois white paper: Improving the system for protecting human subjects: Counteracting IRB “mission creep.” Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5), 617–649.
Jacobs, M. R. (2010). Institutional review boards and independent ethics committees. In M. J. McGraw, A. N. George, S. P. Shearn, R. L. Hall, Jr. T. F. Haws (Eds.), Principles of good clinical practice. (1st ed.,). Pharmaceutical Press.
Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279–289.
Koocher, G. P. (1998). The journal Ethics and Behavior and co-author of Ethics in psychology: Professional standards and cases. Oxford University Press.
Kumar, R. (2014). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (Google eBook 4th ed.,). SAGE.
Lalor, J. G., Begley, C. M., & Devane, D. (2006). Exploring painful experiences: Impact of emotional narratives on members of a qualitative research team. Journal of Advanced Nursing., 55(5), 607–616.
Larson, E., Bratts, T., Zwanziger, J., & Stone, P. (2004). A survey of IRB process in 68 U.S. hospitals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(3), 260–264.
Levine, C. (2009). Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial bioethical issues. McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.
Malacrida, C. (2007). Reflexive journaling on emotional research topics: Ethical issues for team researchers. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1329–1339.
Meslin, E. M., & Quaid, K. A. (2004). Ethical issues in the collection, storage, and research use of human biological materials. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 144(5), 229–234.
Millum, J., & Menikoff, J. (2010). Streamlining ethical review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153(10), 655–657. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-153-10-201011160-00008
Nowak, K. S., et al. (2006). Reforming the oversight of multi-site clinical research: A review of two possible solutions. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, 13(1), 11–24.
Råheim, M., Magnussen, L. H., Sekse, R. J. T., Lunde, Å., Jacobsen, T., & Blystad, A. (2016). Researcher-researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11, 30996. Published 14th Jun 2016. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30996
Resnik, D. B. (2015). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National Institute of Health.
Sales, B. D., & Folkman, S. (Eds.). (2000). Ethics in research with human participants. American Psychological Association.
Shamoo, A., & Resnik, D. (2015). Responsible conduct of research. Oxford University Press.
Stair, T. O., et al. (2001). Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial. Academic Emergency Medicine, 8(6), 636–641.
Ullah, A. K. M. A., & Haque, S. (2020). The migration myth in policy and practice: Dreams, development and despair. Springer.
Ullah, A. K. M. A., & Huque, A. S. (2014). Asian immigrants in North America with HIV/AIDS: Stigma, vulnerabilities and human rights. Springer.
Ullah, A. K. M. A., & Nawaz, F. (2020). Surrogacy-led migration: Reflections on the Policy Dilemmas. Public Administration and Policy, 22(2), In Press. (Emerald Journal)
Ullah, A. K. M. A., Hossain, A., Azizuddin, M., & Nawaz, F. (2020). Social research methods: migration in perspective. Migration Letters, 17(2), 357–368.
Ullah, A. K. M. A., Hossain, M. A., & Islam, K. M. (2015). Migrants and workers fatalities. Palgrave McMillan.
Ullah, A. K. M. A. (2010a) (1st ed). Rationalizing migration decisions: Labour migrants in south and south-east Asia. Ashgate. Routledge (2nd ed., 2016).
Ullah, A. K. M. A. (2010b). Population migration in Asia: Theories and practice. Nova Science Publishers. (Monograph)
Ullah A. K. M. A. (2012). Divergence and convergence in the nation-state: The roles of religion and migration. Nova Science.
Ullah A. K. M. A. (2016). Globalization and the health of Indigenous peoples: From colonization to self-rule. Routledge.
University of Minnesota. (2003). A guide to research ethics. University of Minnesota: Center for Bioethics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahsan Ullah, A.K.M. (2022). Ethics and Empirics: Essence of Ethics in Social Research. In: Islam, M.R., Khan, N.A., Baikady, R. (eds) Principles of Social Research Methodology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5219-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5441-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)