Skip to main content

Influence of Particle Size on Turbulent Flow Using Mono and Hybrid Nanofluids in a Heat Exchanger—An Experimental Investigation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Energy Technologies

Abstract

Mono and hybrid nanofluids are used in this experiment to scrutinize the influence of particle size on the heat transfer enhancement in a radiator. The collected nanoparticles are reduced in size using a planetary ball mill. Additionally, a two-step method was utilized to prepare % volume concentrations of mono nanofluids SiC-L and SiC-S, as well as % volume concentrations of hybrid nanofluids (Al2O3/SiC-S, Al2O3/SiC-L) in the DI water/EG base fluid. Thermal conductivity and viscosity of mono and hybrid nanofluids are investigated and compared at various temperatures in a turbulent flow radiator. Further, the enhancement of Nusselt number and friction factor characteristics is analysed for the prepared mono and hybrid nanofluids. Finally, correlations between the friction factor and Nusselt number are established using regression analysis. According to the findings, when Al2O3/SiC-S hybrid nanoparticles are mixed with a base fluid, heat transfer is improved, and radiator size is reduced when compared to standard coolants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

µ bf :

Dynamic viscosity of the base fluid

µ nf :

Dynamic viscosity of the nanofluids

a :

Radius of the spherical particle

A :

Tube surface area

C p :

Specific heat

D :

Density of the particle

d :

Density of the fluid

d :

Hydraulic diameter of the tubes

g :

Acceleration due to gravity

HTC:

Heat transfer coefficient

K:

Constant

k :

Thermal conductivity of the fluid

k f :

Thermal conductivity of the base fluid (W/mK)

k nf :

Thermal conductivity of nanofluids (W/mK)

l :

Length of the flattened tube of a car radiator

Nu:

Nusselt number

P:

Perimeter of the tubes

Re:

Reynolds number

T :

Average temperature

T w :

Wall temperature

w :

Width of the flattened tube of a car radiator

ΔP:

Pressure drop

μc :

Viscosity of the suspension

φ :

Concentration in %

bf:

Base fluid

\(\varphi\) :

Particle size

nf:

Nanofluid

References

  1. Li F, Li L, Zhong G, Zhai Y, Li Z (2019) Effects of ultrasonic time, size of aggregates and temperature on the stability and viscosity of Cu-ethylene glycol (EG) nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 129:278–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahbubul IM, Elcioglu EB, Amalina MA, Saidur R (2019) Stability, thermophysical properties and performance assessment of alumina–water nanofluid with emphasis on ultrasonication and storage period. Powder Technol 345:668–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akhgar A, Toghraie D (2018) An experimental study on the stability and thermal conductivity of water-ethylene glycol/TiO2-MWCNTs hybrid nanofluid: developing a new correlation. Powder Technol 338:806–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah SNA, Shahabuddin S, Sabri MFM, Salleh MFM, Ali MA, Hayat N, Saidur R (2020) Experimental investigation on stability, thermal conductivity and rheological properties of rGO/ethylene glycol-based nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 150:118981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li L, Zhai Y, Jin Y, Wang J, Wang H, Ma M (2020) Stability, thermal performance and artificial neural network modelling of viscosity and thermal conductivity of Al2O3-ethylene glycol nanofluids. Powder Technol 363:360–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xian HW, Sidik NAC, Saidur R (2020) Impact of different surfactants and ultrasonication time on the stability and thermophysical properties of hybrid nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 110:104389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goudarzi K, Jamali H (2017) Heat transfer enhancement of Al2O3-EG nanofluid in a car radiator with wire coil inserts. Appl Therm Eng 118:510–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hatami M, Jafaryar M, Zhou J, Jing D (2017) Investigation of engines radiator heat recovery using different shapes of nanoparticles in H2O/(CH2OH)2 based nanofluids. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(16):10891–10900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Selvam C, Solaimalai Raja R, Mohan Lal D, Harish S (2017) Overall heat transfer coefficient improvement of an automobile radiator with graphene-based suspensions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 115:580–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Asadi A, Alarifi IM, Ali V, Nguyen HM (2019) An experimental investigation on the effects of ultrasonication time on stability and thermal conductivity of MWCNT-water nanofluid: finding the optimum ultrasonication time. Ultrason Sonochem 58:104639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elsaid AM (2019) Experimental study on the heat transfer performance and friction factor characteristics of CO3O4 and Al2O3 based H2O/(CH2OH)2 nanofluids in a vehicle engine radiator. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 108:104263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akilu S, Baheta AT, Kadirgama K, Padmanabhan E, Sharma KV (2019) Viscosity, electrical and thermal conductivities of ethylene and propylene glycol-based β-SiC nanofluids. J Mol Liq 284:780–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huminic G, Huminic A, Fleaca C, Dumitrache F, Morjan I (2017) Thermo-physical properties of water based SiC nanofluids for heat transfer applications. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 84:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zufar M, Gunnasegaran P, Kumar HM, Ng KC (2020) Numerical and experimental investigations of hybrid nanofluids on pulsating heat pipe performance. Int J Heat Mass Transf 146:118887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anitha S, Thomas T, Parthiban V, Pichumani M (2019) What dominates heat transfer performance of hybrid nanofluid in single pass shell and tube heat exchanger? Adv Powder Technol 30(12):3107–3117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar V, Sarkar J (2019) Numerical and experimental investigations on heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of Al2O3-TiO2 hybrid nanofluid in minichannel heat sink with different mixture ratio. Powder Technol 345:717–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaska SA, Khalefa RA, Hussein AM (2019) Hybrid nanofluid to enhance heat transfer under turbulent flow in a flat tube. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 13:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Asadi A, Asadi M, Rezaniakolaei A, Aistrup L, Afrand M (2018) Heat transfer efficiency of Al2O3-MWCNT/thermal oil hybrid nanofluid as a cooling fluid in thermal and energy management applications: An experimental and theoretical investigation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 117:474–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sundar LS, Singh MK, Sousa ACM (2018) Turbulent heat transfer and friction factor of nanodiamond-nickel hybrid nanofluids flow in a tube with longitudinal strip inserts. Int J Heat Mass Transf 121:390–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhattad A, Sarkar J, Ghosh P (2019) Experimentation on effect of particle ratio on hydrothermal performance of plate heat exchanger using hybrid nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng 162:114309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jai S, Krishnan S, Nagarajan PK (2019) Influence of stability and particle shape effects for an entropy generation based optimized selection of magnesia nanofluid for convective heat flow applications. Appl Surf Sci 489:560–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ambreen T, Kim M (2018) Effects of variable particle sizes on hydrothermal characteristics of nanofluids in a microchannel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 120:490–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maheshwary PB, Handa CC, Nemade KR (2017) A comprehensive study of effect of concentration, particle size and particle shape on thermal conductivity of titania/water based nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng 119:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nikkam N, Ghanbarpour M, Khodabandeh R, Toprak MS (2017) The effect of particle size and base liquid on thermo-physical properties of ethylene and diethylene glycol based copper micro and nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 86:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rabbani M, Mohseni E, Rao M (2016) Effect of particle size and viscosity on thermal conductivity enhancement of graphene oxide nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 76:308–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hossein M, Darvanjooghi K, Esfahany MN (2016) Experimental investigation of the effect of nanoparticle size on thermal conductivity of in-situ prepared silica—ethanol nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 77:148–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Teng T, Hung Y, Teng T, Mo H, Hsu H (2010) The effect of alumina/water nanofluid particle size on thermal conductivity. Appl Therm Eng 30(14–15):2213–2218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anoop KB, Sundararajan T, Das SK (2009) Effect of particle size on the convective heat transfer in nanofluid in the developing region. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52(9–10):2189–2195

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Graham A (1981) On the viscosity of suspensions of solid spheres. Appl Sci Res 37:275–286

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Cardenas Contreras EM, Oliveira GA, Bandarra Filho EP (2019) Experimental analysis of the thermohydraulic performance of graphene and silver nanofluids in automotive cooling systems. Int J Heat Mass Transf 132:375–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ramalingam S, Dhairiyasamy R, Govindasamy M, Muthaiah VMR (2020) Consequence of nanoparticles size on heat transfer characteristics of a radiator. Powder Technol 367:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Said Z, El Haj AM, Hachicha AA, Bellos E, Abdelkareem MA, Alazaizeh DZ, Yousef BAA (2019) Enhancing the performance of automotive radiators using nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 112:183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ardekani AM, Kalantar V, Heyhat MM (2019) Experimental study on heat transfer enhancement of nanofluid flow through helical tubes. Adv Powder Technol 30(9):1815–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ratchagaraja Dhairiyasamy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dhairiyasamy, R., Govindasamy, M. (2023). Influence of Particle Size on Turbulent Flow Using Mono and Hybrid Nanofluids in a Heat Exchanger—An Experimental Investigation. In: Narasimhan, N.L., Bourouis, M., Raghavan, V. (eds) Recent Advances in Energy Technologies. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3467-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3467-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3466-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3467-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics