Abstract
Main results of the review of research in digitalization, digital economy, society, organizations digitalization are provided. The problem considered is mathematical research of information in the action of systems. Main white spots and gaps in the study of information in the action of systems described. As a result, the author points to the existing multidisciplinary gap between the need to solve the use of information for the further action of various systems as mathematical, system theoretic problems and available theoretic and mathematical means to solve such problems. Candidates for the mathematical theory of using the information in system action are suggested. Role of information actions for system action is considered. As a result, the author considers families of alternative stochastic actions networks as an example of modeling information actions use for system actions. The novelty of formalism is in the dynamical nature of networks alternations, modeled as a tree of possible networks. Schemas to model information actions use in system actions are provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A.S. Geyda, T.N. Gurieva, V.N. Naumov, Conceptual and mathematical models, methods, and technologies for studying the digital transformation of economic and social systems: a literature review and research agenda. Adm. Consult. 11, 12 (2021)
H. Derviş, Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R package. JSCIRES 8, 156–160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32
G. Goos, J. Hartmanis, J. van Leeuwen, M. Thielscher, Challenges for Action Theories (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2000)
B. Dick, E. Stringer, C. Huxham, Theory in action research. Action Res. 7, 5–12 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750308099594
J. Aranzadi, (ed.), Human Action, Economics, and Ethics. SpringerBriefs in Economics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73912-0
E. Angela, Complexity Approach to Sustainability, A. Theory, and Application (Imperial College Press, 2011)
N.V. Patel, The Theory of Deferred Action: Purposive Design as Deferred Systems for Emergent Organisations, in Information Systems Theory. Integrated Series in Information Systems, ed. by Y.K. Dwivedi, M.R. Wade, S.L. Schneberger, vol. 28 (Springer New York, New York, 2012), pp. 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_7
N.V. Patel, Organization and Systems Design. Theory of Deferred Action (Springer, 2006)
A. Geyda, I. Lysenko, System potential estimation with regard to digitalization: main ideas and estimation example. Information 11, 164 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/info11030164
F. Ghanbarnejad, R. Saha Roy, F. Karimi, J.-C. Delvenne, B. Mitra, Dynamics on and of Complex Networks III. Machine Learning and Statistical Physics Approaches, ed. by F. Ghanbarnejad, R.S. Roy, F. Karimi, J.-C. Delvenne, B. Mitra (Springer, Cham, 2019)
A. Barrat, M. Barthelemy, A. Vespignani, Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks (Cambridge University Press, Leiden, 2008)
X. Fu, M. Small, G. Chen, Propagation Dynamics on Complex Networks. Models, Methods, and Stability Analysis, ed. by X. Fu, M. Small, G. Chen (Wiley/Higher Education Press, Chichester, 2014)
A. Zinilli, Competitive project funding and dynamic complex networks: evidence from Projects of National Interest (PRIN). Scientometrics 108, 633–652 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1976-4
M. Szelągowski, Dynamic Business Process Management in the Knowledge Economy. They Are Creating Value from Intellectual Capital, ed. by M. Szelągowski (Springer, Cham, 2019)
S.S. Hashemin, S.M.T. Fatemi Ghomi, Constrained consumable resource allocation in alternative stochastic networks via multi-objective decision making. J. Ind. Eng. Int. 8, 207 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-712X-8-18
K. Neumann, Stochastic Project Networks. Temporal Analysis, Scheduling and Cost Minimization (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 1990)
J. Fox, R.P. Cooper, D.W. Glasspool, A canonical theory of dynamic decision-making. Front. Psychol. 4, 150 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00150
C. Gonzalez, P. Fakhari, J. Busemeyer, Dynamic Decision Making: Learning Processes and New Research Directions. Hum. Factors 59, 713–721 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817710347
J.M. Hotaling, P. Fakhari, J.R. Busemeyer, Dynamic Decision Making International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, vol. 8 (Elsevier, 2015), pp. 708–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.43040-0
Гeйдa, A.C., Aшимoв, A.A., Лыceнкo, И.B., Юcyпoв, P.M.: Эффeктивнocть фyнкциoниpoвaния и дpyгиe oпepaциoнныe cвoйcтвa cиcтeм: зaдaчи и мeтoд oцeнивaн ия. Research Problems, Evaluation Method. Tpyды CПИИPAH [SPIIRAS Proceedings] 5, 241–270 (2018)
A. Geyda, Families of alternative stochastic action networks: use for process science, in Conference of Open Innovation FRUCT 28, ed. by Balandin (FRUCT Oy, 2021), p. 9347589
D. Golenko-Ginzburg, A. Gonik, Project planning and control by stochastic network models, in Managing and Modelling Complex Projects, ed. by T.M. Williams (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1997), pp. 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0061-5_4
A.S. Geyda, System capability estimation for various information operations used. MATEC Web of Conference, vol. 346, 2021, in International Conference on Modern Trends in Manufacturing Technologies and Equipment (ICMTMTE) (2021)
R. Miettinen, S. Paavola, P. Pohjola, From habituality to change: contribution of activity theory and pragmatism to practice theories. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 42, 345–360 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2012.00495.x
G.Z. Bedny, I. Bedny, Work activity studies within the framework of ergonomics, psychology, and economics (Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2019)
S. Karanasios, Toward a unified view of technology and activity. ITP 31, 134–155 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2016-0074
C. Marletto, Constructor theory of information, in Information and Interaction. The Frontiers Collection, ed. by I.T. Durham, D. Rickles, vol. 33 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017), pp. 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43760-6_6
Acknowledgements
The reported study was funded by RFBR, project numbers 20-08-00649 and 19-08-00989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Geyda, A. (2022). Information Actions Use for System Activity: Action Modeling Schemas. In: Patnaik, S., Kountchev, R., Jain, V. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Technologies: Rural and Tribal Development Using IoT and Cloud Computing. Advances in Sustainability Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2277-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2277-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2276-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2277-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)