Skip to main content

Analysis of Fine Needle Aspiration Images by Using Hybrid Feature Selection and Various Machine Learning Classifiers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Science and Security

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 462))

  • 313 Accesses

Abstract

Women die of breast cancer most often worldwide. Breast tissue samples can be examined by radiologists, surgeons, and pathologists for evidence of this cancer. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) can be used to detect this cancer through a visual microscopic examination of breast tissue samples. This sample must be examined by a cytopathologist in order to determine the patient's risk of breast cancer. To determine if a tumor is malignant, the nuclei of the cells must be characterized by their chromatin texture patterns. A machine learning method is used in order to categorize FNA images into two classes, respectively ‘Malignant’ and ‘Benign.’ For detecting abnormalities, numerous feature collection methods and machine learning means are applied here. Using features extracted from the FNA image set, UCI machine learning datasets are used to validate the proposed approach. This paper compares three classification methodologies, namely random forests, Naive Bayes, and artificial neural networks, by examining their accuracy, specificity, precision, and sensitivity, respectively. With the ANN and PCA along with the Chi-square selection method, 99.1% of the classifiers are correctly classified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jemal A, et al (2011) Global cancer statistics, CA. A Cancer J Clinicians 61:69–90

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman MP et al (2008) Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncology 9(7):30–56

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hayat MA (2008) Cancer imaging: lung and breast carcinomas. Elsevier Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stenkvist B, Bengtsson E, Eriksson O, Jarkrans T, Nordin B (2986) Image cytometry in malignancy grading of breast cancer. results in a prospective study with seven years of follow-up. Analytical Quantitative Cytology Histology 8:293–300

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Timemy AH, Al-Naima FM, Qaeeb NH (2009) Probabilistic neural network for breast biopsy classification. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering, pp 101–106

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen B et al (2008) Statistical nuclear texture analysis in cancer research: a review of methods and applications. Critical Rev in Oncogogenesis 14(2):89–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akay M (1998) Wavelets and medical imaging. In: Time Frequency and Wavelets in Biomedical Signal Processing. Wiley-IEEE Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nayak S, Gope D (2017) Comparison of supervised learning algorithms for RF-based breast cancer detection. In: 2017 Computing and Electromagnetics International Workshop (CEM), Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gayathri BM, Sumathi CP (2016) Comparative study of relevance vector machine with various machine learning techniques used for detecting breast cancer. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), Chennai, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  10. IARC, World Cancer Report-2008 (2008) International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yip CH et al (2008) Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low and middle income countries: early detection resource allocation. Cancer 113:2244–2256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma Y, Manjunath B (1995) A comparison of wavelet transform features for texture image annotation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, vol 2, pp 256–259

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Preethi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Preethi, N., Jaisingh, W. (2022). Analysis of Fine Needle Aspiration Images by Using Hybrid Feature Selection and Various Machine Learning Classifiers. In: Shukla, S., Gao, XZ., Kureethara, J.V., Mishra, D. (eds) Data Science and Security. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 462. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2211-4_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics