Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of Load Balancing Detection Methods Using Hidden Markov Model for Secured Cloud Computing Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Computational Methods in Manufacturing and Product Design

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Cloud computing is rapidly growing nowadays and stands a creative computing paradigm which provides Internet facilities to meet users’ storage needs. Various interconnected technologies exist in Cloud. Each one has some weaknesses which raise many concerns about privacy and security. One among Cloud computing's main security issues is to safeguard against network encroachments affecting the security, availability, and legitimacy of Cloud services and resources provided. Hidden Markov model is a state-based transition model by which the transition of states is been used to estimate using the distributions of probabilities from another state to previous and next another state. This model can also be used here on this paper for both the identification and prevention of intrusion. Except in the cloud setting where security issues and confidentiality are main concerns, identification and prevention of attack is done. Compared to some other current intrusion detection methodology the recommended methodology applied here is successful. This model also increases the real positive rate of intrusion detection systems and reduces the false positive rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ismail MN, Aborujilah A, Musa S, Shahzad A (2013) Detecting flooding based DoS attack in cloud computing environment using covariance matrix approach

    Google Scholar 

  2. John EK, Thaseen S (2012) Efficient defense system for IP spoofing in networks. Comput Sci In Technol (CS & IT), pp 185–193

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Q, Wang C, Ren K, Lou W, Li J (2011) Enabling public auditability and data dynamics for storage security in cloud computing. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 22(5):847–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khosronejad M, Sharififar E, Torshizi HA, Jalali M (2013) Developing a hybrid method of Hidden Markov Models and C5.0 as a Intrusion Detection System. Int J Database Theory Appl. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijdta.2013.6.5.15. Corpus ID: 32936020

  5. Sultana A, Hamou-Lhadj A, Couture M (2012) An improved Hidden Markov Model for anomaly detection using frequent common patterns. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2012.6364527

  6. Barsoum A, Hasan A (2012) Enabling dynamic data and indirect mutual trust for cloud computing storage systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2012.337. 1045-9219/12/$31.00 © 2012 IEEE

  7. Ali S, Siegel HJ, Maheswaran M, Hensgen D, Ali S (2000) Representing task and machine heterogeneities for heterogeneous computing systems. Tamkang J Sci Eng 3(3):195–207

    Google Scholar 

  8. Azimzadeh F, Biabani F (2017) Multi-objective job scheduling algorithm in cloud computing based on reliability and time. In: 2017 third international conference on web research (ICWR). IEEE, pp 96–101

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, L, Li H, Qiu X, Tang Y (2016) A resource optimization algorithm of cloud data center based on correlated model of reliability, performance and energy. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on software quality, reliability and security companion (QRS-C), Vienna, pp 416–417

    Google Scholar 

  10. Madni SHH, Shafie ALM, Abdulhamid SM (2017) Optimal resource scheduling for IaaS cloud computing using Cuckoo search algorithm. Sains Humanika 9(1–3)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mastelic T, Oleksiak A, Claussen H, Brandic I, Pierson J-M, Vasilakos AV (2015) Cloud computing: survey on energy efficiency. ACM Comput Surv 47(2):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shuja J, Gani A, Shamshirband S, Ahmad RW, Bilal K (2016) Sustainable cloud datacenters: a survey of enabling techniques and technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 62:195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh S, Chana I (2016) A survey on resource scheduling in cloud computing: issues and challenges. J. Grid Comput 14(2):217–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Youn C-H, Chen M, Dazzi P (2017) Cloud broker and cloudlet for workflow scheduling. KAIST Research Series book series. KAISTRS Springer, pp 2214–2541

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang S, Chatha KS (2007) Approximation algorithm for the temperature aware scheduling problem. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer aided design, pp 281–288

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou A, Wang S, Zheng Z, Hsu CH, Lyu MR, Yang F (2016) On cloud service reliability enhancement with optimal resource usage. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput 4(4):452–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y, Hong B, Zhang M et al (2013) ECAD: cloud anomalies detection from an evolutionary view. International Conference on Cloud computing and Big Data (CloudCom-asia). IEEE, pp 328–334

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boutros T, Liang M (2011) Detection and diagnosis of bearing and cutting tool faults using hidden Markov models. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(6):2102–2124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lopes Dalmazo B, Vilela JP, Curado M (2013) Predicting traffic in the Cloud: a statistical approach. 2013 Third international conference on cloud and green computing (CGC). IEEE, pp 121–126

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tan Y, Nguyen H, Shen Z et al (2012) Prepare: detective performance anomaly prevention for virtualized Cloud systems. In: 2012 IEEE 32nd international conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS). IEEE, 285–294

    Google Scholar 

  21. Koch R, Golling M, Rodosek GD (2014) Behavior based intrusion detection in encrypted environments. Commun Mag 52(7):124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao D, Traore I, Sayed B, Lu W, Saad S, Ghorbani A, Garant D (2013) Botnet detection based on traffic behavior analysis and flow intervals. Comput Secur 39:2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng X, Martin P, Brohman K, Xu LD (2014) CLOUDQUAL: a quality model for cloud services. IEEE Trans Ind Informat 10(2):15271536

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shi Y, Larson M, Hanjalic A (2014) Collaborative filtering beyond the user-item matrix: a survey of the state of the art and future challenges. ACM Comput Surv 47(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xing T, Huang D, Xu L, Chung CJ, Khatkar P (2013) Snortflow: a openflow-based intrusion prevention system in cloud environment. In: Research and Educational Experiment Workshop (GREE), 2013 Second GENI, 2013, pp 89–92

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oktay U, Sahingoz OK (2013) Attack types and intrusion detection systems in cloud computing. In: 2013 6th International information security & cryptology conference, pp 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang X, Meng F, Chen P, Xu J (2016) Taskinsight: a fine-grained performance anomaly detection and problem locating system. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 9th international conference on cloud computing (CLOUD). San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Matsuki T, Matsuoka N (2016) A resource contention analysis framework for diagnosis of application performance anomalies in consolidated cloud environments. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/SPEC on international conference on performance engineering (ICPE), Delft, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  29. Calheiros RN, Ramamohanarao K, Buyya R, Leckie C, Versteeg S (2017) On the effectiveness of isolation-based anomaly detection in cloud data centers. Concurrency Computat Pract Exper 29(18):e4169

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tan Y, Nguyen H, Shen Z, Gu X, Venkatramani C, Rajan D (2012) Prepare: predictive performance anomaly prevention for virtualized cloud systems. In: Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE international conference on distributed computing systems, Macau, China

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cetinski K, Juric MB (2015) AME-WPC: advanced model for efficient workload prediction in the cloud. J Netw Comput Appl 55:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ibidunmoye O, Hernández-Rodriguez F, Elmroth E (2015) Performance anomaly detection and bottleneck identification. ACM Comput Surv 48(1):4:1–4:35

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma B, Jayachandran P, Verma A, Das CR (2013) CloudPD: Problem determination and diagnosis in shared dynamic clouds. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN’13). IEEE, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  34. Smith D, Guan Q, Fu S (2010) An anomaly detection framework for autonomic management of compute cloud systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 34th annual computer software and applications conference workshops (COMPSACW’10). IEEE, pp 376–381

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tan Y, Adviser-Gu XH (2012) Online performance anomaly prediction and prevention for complex distributed systems. North Carolina State University

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang T, Zhang W, Wei J, Zhong H (2012) Workload-aware online anomaly detection in enterprise applications with local outlier factor. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 36th annual computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC’12). IEEE, pp 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar DR, Krishna TA, Wahi A (2018) Health monitoring framework for in time recognition of pulmonary embolism using Internet of Things. J Comput Theor Nanosci 15(5):1598–1602. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2018.7347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Krishnasamy L, Dhanaraj RK, Ganesh Gopal D, Reddy Gadekallu T, Aboudaif MK, Abouel Nasr E (2020) A Heuristic angular clustering framework for secured statistical data aggregation in sensor networks. Sensors 20(17), 4937. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174937

  39. Dhiviya S, Malathy S, Kumar DR (2018) Internet of Things (IoT) elements, trends and applications. J Comput Theor Nanosci 15(5):1639–1643. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2018.7354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rajesh Kumar D, Shanmugam A (2017) A hyper heuristic localization based cloned node detection technique using GSA based simulated annealing in sensor networks. In: Cognitive computing for big data systems over IoT, pp 307–335. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70688-7_13

  41. Prasanth T, Gunasekaran M, Kumar DR (2018) Big data Applications on Health Care. 2018 4th International conference on computing communication and automation (ICCCA). 2018 4th International conference on computing communication and automation (ICCCA), Dec 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ccaa.2018.8777586

  42. Lin YD, Lu CN, Lai YC, Peng WH, Lin PC (2019) Application classification using packet size distribution and port association. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 32(5):1023–1030

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Galgotias University, Greater Noida, India

    M. Arvindhan & D. Rajesh Kumar

Authors
  1. M. Arvindhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Rajesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Design, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, Odisha, India

    B. B. V. L. Deepak

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, Odisha, India

    D.R.K. Parhi

  3. National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, Odisha, India

    B.B. Biswal

  4. Department of Production Engineering, VSS University of Technology, Burla, Odisha, India

    Pankaj C. Jena

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arvindhan, M., Rajesh Kumar, D. (2022). Analysis of Load Balancing Detection Methods Using Hidden Markov Model for Secured Cloud Computing Environment. In: Deepak, B.B.V.L., Parhi, D., Biswal, B., Jena, P.C. (eds) Applications of Computational Methods in Manufacturing and Product Design. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0296-3_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0296-3_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0295-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0296-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation