Abstract
The issue of mapping the smartness of cities has attracted the attention of various stakeholders. One of the ways of quantifying city smartness and benchmarking cities based on the level of the achieved smartness is using composite indicators (CIs). However, the topic often cited as the slippery slope of CIs includes methodological issues when combining several indicators into one synthesized value. Aiming at providing a possible remedy to the subject, we employed the I-distance method to the PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) Cities of Opportunity Index. The results pointed out leader cities in terms of smartness, with the additional benefit of the study being encapsulated in much-needed inputs of essential components of the index. Consequently, decision-makers can foster the inputs of the study to raise the bar for a particular city.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Osman, A.M.S.: A novel big data analytics framework for smart cities. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 91, 620–633 (2019)
Huovila, A., Bosch, P., Airaksinen, M.: Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for smart sustainable cities: what indicators and standards to use and when? Cities 89, 141–153 (2019)
Landaluce-Calvo, M.I., Gozalo-Delgado, M.: Proposal for a dynamic composite indicator: application in a comparative analysis of trends in the EU member states towards the Europe 2020 strategy. Soc. Indic. Res. 154(3), 1031–1053 (2020)
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., Torrisi, G.: On the methodological framework of composite indices: a review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Soc. Indic. Res. 141(1), 61–94 (2019)
Ivanovic, B.: Classification of underdeveloped areas according to level of economic development. East. Eur. Econ. 2(1–2), 46–61 (1963)
OECD: The OECD-JRC Handbook on Practices for Developing Composite Indicators. OECD, Paris (2004)
Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A.: Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science? J. R. Stat. Soc. A. Stat. Soc. 176(3), 609–634 (2013)
Maricic, M., Egea, J.A., Jeremic, V.: A hybrid enhanced scatter search—composite I-distance indicator (eSS-CIDI) optimization approach for determining weights within composite indicators. Soc. Indic. Res. 144(2), 497–537 (2019)
Freudenberg, M.: Composite indicators of country performance: a critical assessment. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 16, 35 (2003)
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hofman, A., Giovannini, E.: Handbook on constructing composite indicators. OECD Statistics Working Papers (2005)
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Matarazzo, B., Torrisi, G.: Stochastic multi-attribute acceptability analysis (SMAA): an application to the ranking of Italian regions. Reg. Stud. 52(4), 585–600 (2018)
Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Zhou, D.Q.: Weighting and aggregation in composite indicator construction: a multiplicative optimization approach. Soc. Indic. Res. 96(1), 169–181 (2010)
Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.L.: Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: an objective measure. Ecol. Econ. 59(3), 305–311 (2006)
Mathis, S., Kanik A., (2021), Why you’ll be hearing a lot less about ‘smart cities’ https://citymonitor.ai/government/budgets/why-youll-be-hearing-a-lot-less-about-smart-cities
Bakici, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J.: A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 4(2), 135–148 (2013)
Science for Environment Policy.: Indicators for sustainable cities, In-depth Report 12. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol (2018)
Bogdanov, O., Jeremić, V., Jednak, S., Čudanov, M.: Scrutinizing the smart city index: a multivariate statistical approach. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu 37(2), 777–799 (2019)
Rafaj, O.: Cities and human capital. In: 6th Winter Seminar of Regional Science Society for Regional Science and Policy—Slovak Section of ERSA (2016). Available at http://ersa.sk/Zbornik/files/Rafaj.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2021
Vlasenko, L., Ivanova, I.: Urbanization processes and practices of smart city as factors influencing youth’s social values. MATEC Web Conf. 106, 01020 (2017)
Pultrone, G.: Participation and governance for more human smart cities, Tema. J. Land Use, Mobility Environ. 7(2), 159–172 (2014)
Brundtland, G.H.: Our common future—call for action. Environ. Conserv. 14(4), 291–294 (1987)
Yiftachel, O., Hedgcock, D.: Urban social sustainability: the planning of an Australian city. Cities 10(2), 139–157 (1993)
Alkis, N., Çaldag, M.T., Gokalp, E.: An integrated holistic success model for evaluating smart city initiatives. In: Proceedings on the International Conference on Internet Computing (ICOMP), pp. 16–21. The Steering Committee of the World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp) (2019)
Snieska, V., Zykiene, I.: The role of infrastructure in the future city: theoretical perspective. Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 156, 247–251 (2014)
Bhattacharya, T.R., Bhattacharya, A., Mclellan, B., Tezuka, T.: Sustainable smart city development framework for developing countries. Urban Res. Practice 13(2), 180–212 (2020)
Cities of Opportunity.: PWC cities of opportunity (2021). Available at https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/asset-management/real-estate-insights/assets/real-estate-cities-opportunities.pdf; PWC Report.: In-depth report of PWC cities of opportunity (2021). Available at https://www.pwc.nl/nl/assets/documents/pwc-cities-of-opportunity-7.pdf
Ivanovic, B.: A method of establishing a list of development indicators. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, 1973. SHC/WS/291
Jeremic, V., Bulajic, M., Martic, M., Radojicic, Z.: A fresh approach to evaluating the academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics 87(3), 587–596 (2011)
Radojicic, M., Jeremic, V., Savic, G.: Going beyond health efficiency: what really matters? Int. J. Health Plann. Manage. 35(1), 318–338 (2020)
Jeremic, V., Radovanovic, S., Damnjanovic, V.: One size doesn’t fit all: going beyond weights in the evaluation of cities’ smartness. In: XIX International Triple Helix Conference, Sao Paulo, Brasil (online) (2021)
Savić, D., Jeremic, V., Petrovic, N.: Rebuilding the pillars of sustainable society index: a multivariate post hoc I-distance approach. Problemy ekorozwoju–Probl. Sustain. Dev. 12(1), 125–134 (2016)
Perna, L.W.: The benefits of higher education: sex, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic group differences. Rev. High. Educ. 29(1), 23–52 (2005)
Li, J.: World-class higher education and the emerging Chinese model of the university. Prospects 42(3), 319–339 (2012)
Aabø, S.: Valuing the benefits of public libraries. Inf. Econ. Policy 17(2), 175–198 (2005)
Livingstone, S.: Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxf. Rev. Educ. 38(1), 9–24 (2012)
Vicente, M.R., Gil-de-Bernabé, F.: Assessing the broadband gap: from the penetration divide to the quality divide. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 77(5), 816–822 (2010)
Ross, A., Banerjee, S., Chowdhury, A.: Security in smart cities: a brief review of digital forensic schemes for biometric data. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 138, 346–354 (2020)
Bloom, D.E., Canning, D., Fink, G.: Implications of population ageing for economic growth. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 26(4), 583–612 (2010)
Haggard, D.L., Haggard, K.S.: The impact of law, religion, and culture on the ease of starting a business. Int. J. Org. Theory Behav. (2018)
Rose, A.K.: The foreign service and foreign trade: embassies as export promotion. World Econ. 30(1), 22–38 (2007)
Acuto, M., Pejic, D.: Shaping a global comparative imagination? Assessing the role of city rankings in the “global city” discourse. Area (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12710
Taubenböck, H., Reiter, M., Dosch, F., Leichtle, T., Weigand, M., Wurm, M. (2021). Which city is the greenest? A multi-dimensional deconstruction of city rankings. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 89, 101687 (2021)
Saez, L., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Rodriguez-Nunez, E.: Sustainable city rankings, benchmarking and indexes: looking into the black box. Sustain. Cities Society 53, 101938 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Uskoković, V., Maričić, M., Jeremić, V. (2022). Towards an Impartial Evaluation of Cities’ Smartness: A Multivariate Statistical Approach. In: Reis, J.L., Peter, M.K., Cayolla, R., Bogdanović, Z. (eds) Marketing and Smart Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 280. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9272-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9272-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9271-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9272-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)