Skip to main content

OULAD Learners’ Withdrawal Prediction Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Innovations in Computing

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 855))

Abstract

Nowadays, web-based courses are popular as students can learn at their convenience and according to their free time. One advantage is the availability of study materials that can be used in a blended learning program. However, it suffers from a high withdrawal problem. This article contributes to the research by proposing a withdrawal prediction framework based on the Open University, a large distance-learning institution. The study contribution is a dropout prediction framework. The prediction process includes handling missing data using the MissForest algorithm, tackling imbalanced data issues using SOMTEFUNA, reducing dimensions using PCA, and training different classifiers. The experiments show Decision Tree classifier as the best predictive model with an F1-score of 0.99. The proposed framework outperforms other researches by 12% when compared to the previous research work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Jiang, D. Kotzias, Assessing the use of social media in massive open online courses. arXiv:1608.05668 (2016)

  2. W. Li, M. Gao, H. Li, Q. Xiong, J. Wen, Z. Wu, Dropout prediction in MOOCs using behavior features and multi-view semi-supervised learning. in 2016 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) (IEEE, 2016), pp. 3130–3137

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Tan, P. Shao, Prediction of student dropout in e-Learning program through the use of machine learning method. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 10(1) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.C. Mihaescu, P.S. Popescu, Review on publicly available datasets for educational data mining. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Mining Knowl. Discov. e1403 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Shridharan, A. Willingham, J. Spencer, T.-Y. Yang, C. Brinton, Predictive learning analytics for video-watching behavior in MOOCs. in 2018 52nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Kuzilek, M. Hlosta, Z. Zdrahal, Open university learning analytics dataset. Sci. data 4(1), 1–8 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J Kuzilek, J. Vaclavek, V. Fuglik, Z. Zdrahal, Student drop-out modelling using virtual learning environment behaviour data. in European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 166–171

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Hussain, W. Zhu, W. Zhang, S.M.R. Abidi, Student engagement predictions in an e-learning system and their impact on student course assessment scores. Comput Intell Neurosci (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Heuer, A. Breiter, Student success prediction and the trade-off between big data and data minimization. DeLFI 2018-Die 16. E-Learning Fachtagung Informatik, 219–230 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Alshabandar, A. Hussain, R. Keight, A. Laws, T. Baker, The application of Gaussian mixture models for the identification of at-risk learners in massive open online courses. in 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Rizvi, B. Rienties, S.A. Khoja, The role of demographics in online learning; a decision tree based approach. Comput. Edu. 137, 32–47 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Haiyang, Z. Wang, P. Benachour, P. Tubman, A time series classification method for behaviour-based dropout prediction. in 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 191–195

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Ramesh, S.H. Kumar, J. Foulds, L. Getoor, Weakly supervised models of aspect-sentiment for online course discussion forums. in Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (vol. 1: Long Papers, 2015), pp. 74–83

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Hlioui, N. Aloui, F. Gargouri, Withdrawal prediction framework in virtual learning environment. Int. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. Eng. Technol. (IJSSMET) 11(3), 47–64 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.J. Stekhoven, P. Bühlmann, MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28(1), 112–118 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A.S. Tarawneh, Smotefuna: synthetic minority over-sampling technique based on furthest neighbour algorithm. IEEE Access 8, 59069–59082 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Dimic, D. Rancic, N. Macek, P. Spalevic, V. Drasute, Improving the prediction accuracy in blended learning environment using synthetic minority oversampling technique. Inf. Discov. Deliv. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Wold, K. Esbensen, P. Geladi, Principal component analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2(1–3), 37–52 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel et al, Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Hlioui, N. Aloui, F. Gargouri, A Withdrawal prediction model of at-risk learners based on behavioural indicators. Int. J. Web-Based Learn. Teach. Technol. (IJWLTT) 16(2), 32–53 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Palani, P. Stynes, P. Pathak, Clustering techniques to identify low-engagement student levels. In CSEDU (2), 248–257(2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moohanad Jawthari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jawthari, M., Stoffa, V. (2022). OULAD Learners’ Withdrawal Prediction Framework. In: Singh, P.K., Singh, Y., Chhabra, J.K., Illés, Z., Verma, C. (eds) Recent Innovations in Computing. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 855. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8892-8_52

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics