Abstract
Preoperative evaluation is an integral part of hypospadias surgery. It includes the type of hypospadias, size of urethral plate and glans, chordee and penile torque, hypoplastic urethral length and dorsal hood. Severe hypospadias should be evaluated radiologically for lower and upper urinary tract, hormonal status, and intersex disorders. Six to 18 months of age is the golden time to operate the hypospadias patients. Patients are operated on under general anaesthesia, regional and local blocks for postoperative pain. The microsurgical instruments, magnification, and gentle tissue handling help to have better results. Bladder drainage with an appropriate catheter helps in improving the outcomes. The use of local or systemic hormones is useful for improving the growth and vascularity of the urethral plate in the patients with poorly developed urethral plate. The urethral plate preservation urethroplasty results are better, and the addition of spongioplasty to TIPU reconstructs a near-normal urethra. The algorithms are proposed with a rational approach for both one- and two-stage urethroplasty. Surgical training, experience, and type of hypospadias guide the surgeon to choose one-stage or two-stage repair. Applying the basic microsurgical principles, choice of one- or two-stage in a given case, use of the magnification and fine suture material, surgery at desired age, and proper postoperative care yield good results of hypospadias repair.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- TIP:
-
Tubularized Incised Urethral Plate Urethroplasty
- TUPU:
-
Tubularized Urethral Plate Urethroplasty
References
Davis DM. Surgical treatment of hypospadias, especially scrotal and perineal. J Urol. 1951;65(4):595–602.
Titley OG, Bracka A. A 5-year audit of trainees experience and outcomes with two-stage hypospadias surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51(5):370–5.
Snyder CL, Evangelidis A, Hansen G, Peter SDS, Ostlie DJ, Gatti JM, Gittes GK, Sharp RJ, Murphy JP. Management of complications after hypospadias repair. Urology. 2005;65(4):782–5.
Shukla AR, Patel RP, Canning DA. Hypospadias. Urol Clin. 2004;31(3):445–60.
Duckett J, Walsh P, Retik A, Vaughan E. Campbell's urology. Hypospadias. 1998;5:353–95.
Khuri F. Urological anomalies associated with hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am. 1981;8:565.
Manzoni G, Bracka A, Palminteri E, Marrocco G. Hypospadias surgery: when what and by whom? BJU Int. 2004;94(8):1188–95.
Kass EJ, Bolong D. Single-stage hypospadias reconstruction without fistula. J Urol. 1990;144(2 Part 2):520–2.
Bhat A. Extended urethral mobilization in incised plate urethroplasty for severe hypospadias: a variation in technique to improve chordee correction. J Urol. 2007;178(3):1031–5.
Mouriquand P, Mure PY. Current concepts in hypospadiology. BJU Int. 2004;93:26–34.
McMahon D, Kramer S, Husmann D. Micropenis: does early treatment with testosterone do more harm than good? J Urol. 1995;154(2):825–9.
Snodgrass W, Villanueva C, Bush NC. Duration of follow-up to diagnose hypospadias urethroplasty complications. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(2):208–11.
Gilbert DA, Devine CJ Jr, Winslow BH, Horton CE, Getz SE. Microsurgical hypospadias repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77(3):460–5.
Goel P, Jain S, Bajpai M, Khanna P, Jain V, Yadav DK. Does caudal analgesia increase the rates of urethrocutaneous fistula formation after hypospadias repair? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Urol. 2019;35(3):222.
Tanseco PP, Randhawa H, Chua ME, Blankstein U, Kim JK, McGrath M, Lorenzo AJ, Braga LH. Postoperative complications of hypospadias repair in patients receiving caudal block vs non-caudal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13(8):E249.
Braga LH, Jegatheeswaran K, McGrath M, Easterbrook B, Rickard M, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Cause and effect versus confounding—is there a true association between caudal blocks and tubularized incised plate repair complications? J Urol. 2017;197(3 Part 2):845–51.
Riquelme M, Aranda A, Rodarte-Shade M, Rodriguez-Gomez J, Torres-Riquelme J. A new surgical stabilizing instrument for hypospadias repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013;23(02):148–9.
Snodgrass W, Bush N. Recent advances in understanding/management of hypospadias. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:101. https://doi.org/10.12703/P6-101.
Ulman I, Erikci V, Avanoğlu A, Gökdemir A. The effect of suturing technique and material on complication rate following hypospadias repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1997;7(03):156–7.
Hakim S, Merguerian PA, Rabinowitz R, Shortliffe LD, McKenna PH. Outcome analysis of the modified Mathieu hypospadias repair: comparison of stented and unstented repairs. J Urol. 1996;156(2):836–8.
Shirazi M, Noorafshan A, Serhan A. Effects of different suture materials used for the repair of hypospadias: a stereological study in a rat model. Urol Int. 2012;89(4):395–401.
Bhat A. General considerations in hypospadias surgery. Indian J Urol. 2008;24(2):188.
Waterman BJ, Renschler T, Cartwright PC, Snow BW, de Vries CR. Variables in successful repair of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery. J Urol. 2002;168(2):726–30.
Van Savage JG, Palanca LG, Slaughenhoupt BL. A prospective randomized trial of dressings versus no dressings for hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2000;164(3):981–3.
Gangopadhyay A, Sharma S. Brief report-Peha-haft bandage as a new dressing for pediatric hypospadias repair. Indian J Plast Surg. 2005;38(2):162–4.
Snodgrass W, Yucel S. Tubularized incised plate for mid-shaft and proximal hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2007;177(2):698–702.
Braga LH, Pippi Salle JL, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, Dave S, Farhat WA, Khoury AE, Bagli DJ. Comparative analysis of tubularized incised plate versus onlay island flap urethroplasty for penoscrotal hypospadias. J Urol. 2007;178(4):1451–7.
Gershbaum MD, Stock JA, Hanna MK. A case for the 2-stage repair of perineoscrotal hypospadias with severe chordee. J Urol. 2002;168(4 Part 2):1727–9.
Ferro F, Zaccara A, Spagnoli A, Lucchetti M, Capitanucci M, Villa M. Skin graft for 2-stage treatment of severe hypospadias: back to the future? J Urol. 2002;168(4):1730–3.
Kajbafzadeh A-M, Arshadi H, Payabvash S, Salmasi AH, Najjaran-Tousi V, Sahebpor ARA. Proximal hypospadias with severe chordee: single-stage repair using corporeal tunica vaginalis free graft. J Urol. 2007;178(3):1036–42.
Gray J, Boston V. Glanular reconstruction and preputioplasty repair for distal hypospadias: a unique day-case method to avoid urethral stenting and preserve the prepuce. BJU Int. 2003;91(3):268–70.
Klijn AJ, Dik P, De Jong TP. Results of preputial reconstruction in 77 boys with distal hypospadias. J Urol. 2001;165(4):1255–7.
Erdenetsetseg G, Dewan P. Reconstruction of the hypospadiac hooded prepuce. J Urol. 2003;169(5):1822–4.
Kwon TG, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Autologous penile corpora cavernosa replacement using tissue engineering techniques. J Urol. 2002;168(4):1754–8.
Atala A. Recent developments in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18(2):167–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhat, A., Khandelwal, N. (2022). General Considerations in Hypospadias Surgery. In: Bhat, A. (eds) Hypospadiology . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8395-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8395-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8394-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8395-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)