Skip to main content

General Considerations in Hypospadias Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hypospadiology

Abstract

Preoperative evaluation is an integral part of hypospadias surgery. It includes the type of hypospadias, size of urethral plate and glans, chordee and penile torque, hypoplastic urethral length and dorsal hood. Severe hypospadias should be evaluated radiologically for lower and upper urinary tract, hormonal status, and intersex disorders. Six to 18 months of age is the golden time to operate the hypospadias patients. Patients are operated on under general anaesthesia, regional and local blocks for postoperative pain. The microsurgical instruments, magnification, and gentle tissue handling help to have better results. Bladder drainage with an appropriate catheter helps in improving the outcomes. The use of local or systemic hormones is useful for improving the growth and vascularity of the urethral plate in the patients with poorly developed urethral plate. The urethral plate preservation urethroplasty results are better, and the addition of spongioplasty to TIPU reconstructs a near-normal urethra. The algorithms are proposed with a rational approach for both one- and two-stage urethroplasty. Surgical training, experience, and type of hypospadias guide the surgeon to choose one-stage or two-stage repair. Applying the basic microsurgical principles, choice of one- or two-stage in a given case, use of the magnification and fine suture material, surgery at desired age, and proper postoperative care yield good results of hypospadias repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

TIP:

Tubularized Incised Urethral Plate Urethroplasty

TUPU:

Tubularized Urethral Plate Urethroplasty

References

  1. Davis DM. Surgical treatment of hypospadias, especially scrotal and perineal. J Urol. 1951;65(4):595–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Titley OG, Bracka A. A 5-year audit of trainees experience and outcomes with two-stage hypospadias surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51(5):370–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Snyder CL, Evangelidis A, Hansen G, Peter SDS, Ostlie DJ, Gatti JM, Gittes GK, Sharp RJ, Murphy JP. Management of complications after hypospadias repair. Urology. 2005;65(4):782–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shukla AR, Patel RP, Canning DA. Hypospadias. Urol Clin. 2004;31(3):445–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duckett J, Walsh P, Retik A, Vaughan E. Campbell's urology. Hypospadias. 1998;5:353–95.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khuri F. Urological anomalies associated with hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am. 1981;8:565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Manzoni G, Bracka A, Palminteri E, Marrocco G. Hypospadias surgery: when what and by whom? BJU Int. 2004;94(8):1188–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kass EJ, Bolong D. Single-stage hypospadias reconstruction without fistula. J Urol. 1990;144(2 Part 2):520–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhat A. Extended urethral mobilization in incised plate urethroplasty for severe hypospadias: a variation in technique to improve chordee correction. J Urol. 2007;178(3):1031–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mouriquand P, Mure PY. Current concepts in hypospadiology. BJU Int. 2004;93:26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McMahon D, Kramer S, Husmann D. Micropenis: does early treatment with testosterone do more harm than good? J Urol. 1995;154(2):825–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Snodgrass W, Villanueva C, Bush NC. Duration of follow-up to diagnose hypospadias urethroplasty complications. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(2):208–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilbert DA, Devine CJ Jr, Winslow BH, Horton CE, Getz SE. Microsurgical hypospadias repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77(3):460–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goel P, Jain S, Bajpai M, Khanna P, Jain V, Yadav DK. Does caudal analgesia increase the rates of urethrocutaneous fistula formation after hypospadias repair? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Urol. 2019;35(3):222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanseco PP, Randhawa H, Chua ME, Blankstein U, Kim JK, McGrath M, Lorenzo AJ, Braga LH. Postoperative complications of hypospadias repair in patients receiving caudal block vs non-caudal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13(8):E249.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Braga LH, Jegatheeswaran K, McGrath M, Easterbrook B, Rickard M, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Cause and effect versus confounding—is there a true association between caudal blocks and tubularized incised plate repair complications? J Urol. 2017;197(3 Part 2):845–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riquelme M, Aranda A, Rodarte-Shade M, Rodriguez-Gomez J, Torres-Riquelme J. A new surgical stabilizing instrument for hypospadias repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013;23(02):148–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Snodgrass W, Bush N. Recent advances in understanding/management of hypospadias. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:101. https://doi.org/10.12703/P6-101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ulman I, Erikci V, Avanoğlu A, Gökdemir A. The effect of suturing technique and material on complication rate following hypospadias repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1997;7(03):156–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hakim S, Merguerian PA, Rabinowitz R, Shortliffe LD, McKenna PH. Outcome analysis of the modified Mathieu hypospadias repair: comparison of stented and unstented repairs. J Urol. 1996;156(2):836–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shirazi M, Noorafshan A, Serhan A. Effects of different suture materials used for the repair of hypospadias: a stereological study in a rat model. Urol Int. 2012;89(4):395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhat A. General considerations in hypospadias surgery. Indian J Urol. 2008;24(2):188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Waterman BJ, Renschler T, Cartwright PC, Snow BW, de Vries CR. Variables in successful repair of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery. J Urol. 2002;168(2):726–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Savage JG, Palanca LG, Slaughenhoupt BL. A prospective randomized trial of dressings versus no dressings for hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2000;164(3):981–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gangopadhyay A, Sharma S. Brief report-Peha-haft bandage as a new dressing for pediatric hypospadias repair. Indian J Plast Surg. 2005;38(2):162–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Snodgrass W, Yucel S. Tubularized incised plate for mid-shaft and proximal hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2007;177(2):698–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Braga LH, Pippi Salle JL, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, Dave S, Farhat WA, Khoury AE, Bagli DJ. Comparative analysis of tubularized incised plate versus onlay island flap urethroplasty for penoscrotal hypospadias. J Urol. 2007;178(4):1451–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gershbaum MD, Stock JA, Hanna MK. A case for the 2-stage repair of perineoscrotal hypospadias with severe chordee. J Urol. 2002;168(4 Part 2):1727–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferro F, Zaccara A, Spagnoli A, Lucchetti M, Capitanucci M, Villa M. Skin graft for 2-stage treatment of severe hypospadias: back to the future? J Urol. 2002;168(4):1730–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kajbafzadeh A-M, Arshadi H, Payabvash S, Salmasi AH, Najjaran-Tousi V, Sahebpor ARA. Proximal hypospadias with severe chordee: single-stage repair using corporeal tunica vaginalis free graft. J Urol. 2007;178(3):1036–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gray J, Boston V. Glanular reconstruction and preputioplasty repair for distal hypospadias: a unique day-case method to avoid urethral stenting and preserve the prepuce. BJU Int. 2003;91(3):268–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Klijn AJ, Dik P, De Jong TP. Results of preputial reconstruction in 77 boys with distal hypospadias. J Urol. 2001;165(4):1255–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Erdenetsetseg G, Dewan P. Reconstruction of the hypospadiac hooded prepuce. J Urol. 2003;169(5):1822–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kwon TG, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Autologous penile corpora cavernosa replacement using tissue engineering techniques. J Urol. 2002;168(4):1754–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Atala A. Recent developments in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18(2):167–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bhat, A., Khandelwal, N. (2022). General Considerations in Hypospadias Surgery. In: Bhat, A. (eds) Hypospadiology . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8395-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8395-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8394-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8395-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics