Abstract
Commonest complaint in the long-term follow-up of Hypospadiacs is the short penis, and all pediatricians and clinicians frequently encounter the questions by parents regarding the standard size of their child’s penis. Much less than required attention is paid to the size of the penis in management of hypospadias repair. Size of the penis and glans is a vital variable in defining the outcome of hypospadias surgery. The abnormalities of penile morphology are likely to affect interpersonal relations. It may also lead to emotional disturbances with the growth of a child to adulthood. Child’s parents/patients may have a misconception of the size of the penis, even in the cases of normal variations. On the other hand, the micropenis must be ruled out. The penis otherwise is normal in terms of shape and function, but is smaller by >2.5 SD than the mean size in terms of length for age of the child is termed as micropenis. With a defined penile nomogram, the patients and parents can be counseled regarding the penile size. However, as the physical stature differs across racial and ethnical spectrums, it stands to reason that penile size may vary too. A separate penile dimensions chart may be necessary to define the standard penile dimensions among various population groups. The chapter will provide denominator about the size of the penis and its relation with age and BMR, which will help in the timely clinician treatment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Schonfeld W. Adolescence: inappropriate sexual development and body image. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1967;22(11):847–55.
Schonfeld WA, Beebe GW. Normal growth and variation in the male genitalia from birth to maturity. J Urol. 1942;48(6):759–77.
Bhat A, Upadhyay R, Bhat M, Sabharwal K, Singla M, Kumar V. Penile anthropometry in north Indian children. Indian J Urol. 2015;31(2):106.
Khadilkar V, Stanhope R, Khadilkar V. Secular trends in puberty. Indian Pediatr. 2006;43(6):475.
Vasudevan G, Bhat BV, Bhatia B, Kumar S. Genital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J Pediatr. 1995;62(5):593–6.
Hatipoğlu N, Kurtoğlu S. Micropenis: etiology, diagnosis and treatment approaches. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2013;5(4):217–23. https://doi.org/10.4274/Jcrpe.1135.
Adriansyah R, Ali M, Hakimi H, Deliana M, Lubis SM. The relationship of body mass index to penile length and testicular volume in adolescent boys. Paediatr Indones. 2012;52(5):267–71.
Wang Y-N, Zeng Q, Xiong F, Zeng Y. Male external genitalia growth curves and charts for children and adolescents aged 0 to 17 years in Chongqing, China. Asian J Androl. 2018;20(6):567.
Tomova A, Deepinder F, Robeva R, Lalabonova H, Kumanov P, Agarwal A. Growth and development of male external genitalia: a cross-sectional study of 6200 males aged 0 to 19 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(12):1152–7.
Park S, Chung JM, Kang DI, Ryu DS, Cho WY, Lee SD. The change of stretched penile length and anthropometric data in Korean children aged 0–14 years: comparative study of last 25 years. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(10):1631–4.
Bush NC, Villanueva C, Snodgrass W. Glans size is an independent risk factor for urethroplasty complications after hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(6):355.e351–5.
Baskin LS. Hypospadias and urethral development. J Urol. 2000;163(3):951–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhat, M., Bhat, A. (2022). Penile Anthropometry. In: Bhat, A. (eds) Hypospadiology . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8395-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8395-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8394-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8395-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)