Skip to main content

Thermal Comfort Evaluation at the Multipurpose Hall of an Academic Campus

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Separation Technology

Abstract

Most of the building design has a combination of natural ventilation and mechanical ventilation is used for indoor cooling purposes in many large enclosed spaces. However, this cooling method is insufficient to provide the occupants with a comfortable temperature level due to low wind velocity and the inability of a mechanical ventilator to remove warm air. The aim of this study is to evaluate the thermal comfort in a multipurpose hall. To assess the thermal perception of occupants in the multipurpose space, 179 occupants were randomly selected to participate in the survey. In addition, 4 indoor environmental variables were calculated using the Thermal Comfort Kit, including air temperature, air velocity, globe temperature and relative humidity. Data from questionnaire surveys and fieldwork measurements were obtained at the same time for 6 days between September and November 2019. All data collected were interpreted using the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) indices, which reflect the state of thermal comfort within the multipurpose hall. For this analysis, the PMV and PPD values for fieldwork measurements are 2.1 and 82.6%, while the thermal sensation voting values are 1.6 and 55%. Both PMV and PPD values for thermal environment measurement in the multipurpose hall and questionnaire survey exceed the respective upper limits as recommended in ASHRAE Standard 55 (2017) and the acceptability criterion in ISO 7730 (2005), indicating that the thermal comfort within the hall is warm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yao J, Yang F, Zhuang Z, Shao Y, Yuan PF (2018) The effect of personal and microclimatic variables on outdoor thermal comfort: a field study in a cold season in Lujiazui CBD, Shanghai. Sustain Cities Soc 39:181–188.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.025

  2. Sari KAM, Mastaza KFA, Rahman MAA, Saji N, Muslim R, Mustafa MSS, Ghing TY (2019) Assessment of indoor air quality parameters at Ambulatory Care Centre XYZ, Malaysia. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, vol 373, no 1, p 012013. IOP Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim J, Schiavon S, Brager G (2018) Personal comfort models-A new paradigm in thermal comfort for occupant-centric environmental control. Build Environ 132:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seppänen OA, Fisk W (2006) Some quantitative relations between indoor environmental quality and work performance or health. Hvac&R Res 12(4):957–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2006.10391446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahman MAA et al (2014) The review on significant adverse impact of poor indoor air quality on employees health. Adv Mater Res 931–932:749–753. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.931-932.749

  6. Wyon DP, Wargocki P (2006) Room temperature effects on office work. In: Creating the productive workplace, pp 181–192. Taylor & Francis, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Awang M, Tham CS, Ruddin NMB, Rahman MAA, Hamidon N, Ahmad F, Rahman MSA (2020) Assessment of energy saving potential and lighting system in teaching building. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Thermal Sci 65:159–169

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASHRAE, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2017 (2017) Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta. https://ashrae.iwrapper.com/ViewOnline/Standard_55-2017

  9. Cardoso V, Ramos NM, Almeida RM, Barreira E, Martins JP, Simões ML, Ribeiro B (2017) Thermal comfort evaluation in cruise terminals. Build Environ 126:276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan MH, Pao W (2015) Thermal comfort analysis of PMV model prediction in air conditioned and naturally ventilated buildings. Energy Proc 75:1373–1379; 183:484–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.218

  11. Sari KAM, Mastaza KFA, Rahman MAA, Musa MK, Awang M, Saji N (2018) Indoor air quality assessment at care centre ABC, Malaysia. In: Financial and economic tools used in the world hospitality industry: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on management and technology in knowledge, service, tourism and hospitality, SERVE 2017, pp 39–42. CRC Press, Balkema. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315148762-8

  12. Santamouris M, Wouters P (2006) Building ventilation: the state of the art. UK and USA. Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.218

  13. Robert MP Eng (2006) Fundamentals of HVAC IP book: chapter 3 thermal comfort. Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372497-7/50018-X

  14. ISO (2001) Ergonomics of the thermal environment Instruments for measuring physical quantities. BS EN ISO 7726:2001

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mustafa MSS, Yusop F, Abdullah MA, Rahman MAA, Sari KAM, Fahmi AR, Hariri A (2019) Humidity control strategies in operation theatre Malaysia. In: IOP Conference series: earth and environmental science, vol 373, no 1, p 012016. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/373/1/012016

  16. Khalid W, Zaki SA, Rijal HB, Yakub F (2019) Investigation of comfort temperature and thermal adaptation for patients and visitors in Malaysian hospitals. Energy Build. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.019

  17. ISO B (2004) 8996: 2004 Ergonomics of the thermal environment-Determination of metabolic rate. BSI, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hall MR (2010) Materials for energy efficiency and thermal comfort in buildings. Woodhead publishing limited

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu Z, Li N, Wargocki P, Peng J, Li J, Cui H (2019) Adaptive thermal comfort in naturally ventilated dormitory buildings in Changsha, China. Energy Build. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.029

  20. International Organization for Standardization (1995) ISO 10551: 1995. Ergonomics of the thermal environment-assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales

    Google Scholar 

  21. ISO standard 7730, 3rd ed. (En), ISO (2005) Ergonomics of the thermal environment. Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria

    Google Scholar 

  22. Department of Standard Malaysia (2014) Malaysian standard: code of practice on energy efficiency and use of renewable energy for non-residential buildings. MS1525:2014

    Google Scholar 

  23. Malaysia DOSH (2010) Industry code of practice on indoor air quality 2010, JKKP DP (S) 127/379/4-39. Minist Hum Resour Dep Occup Saf Heal, 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  24. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW (1970) Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Measur 30(3):607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khamidun MH, Abdul Rahman MA (2017) Analysis of mass transfer resistance for adsorption of phosphate onto industrial waste materials in plug-flow column. In: MATEC web of conferences, vol 103. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710306004

  26. Shaharon MN, Jalaludin J (2012) Thermal comfort assessment-a study toward workers’ satisfaction in a low energy office building. Am J Appl Sci 9(7):1037. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2012.1037.1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maykot JK, Rupp RF, Ghisi E (2018) A field study about gender and thermal comfort temperatures in office buildings. Energy Build 178:254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gilbert AL, Miles DB (2017) Natural selection on thermal preference, critical thermal maxima and locomotor performance. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 284(1860):20170536. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pourshaghaghy A, Omidvari M (2012) Examination of thermal comfort in a hospital using PMV-PPD model. Appl Ergon 43(6):1089–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Universiti Tun Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) funded this work under Tier 1 grant (H228). The authors are completely appreciative of UTHM and UTM team members who have provided input and experience to support research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. K. Musa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Musa, M.K. et al. (2021). Thermal Comfort Evaluation at the Multipurpose Hall of an Academic Campus. In: Zaini, M.A.A., Jusoh, M., Othman, N. (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Separation Technology. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0742-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0742-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0741-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0742-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics