Abstract
Seismic analysis of structures will not be complete without a proper investigation of underlying soil behavior to dynamic loading. Such dynamic behavior is complex in nature due to many influencing parameters. The complex dynamic soil behavior can be represented using the strength and stiffness properties such as low-strain shear modulus (Gmax), modulus ratio (G/Gmax), and damping ratio (D) variation with shear strain along with the liquefaction potential of soils. Several field and laboratory element testing techniques are available for assessing the behavior of soils to dynamic loads. This article describes some of the widely used field and laboratory testing techniques for the dynamic investigations of soils. Typical results using each test are also provided for easy and comprehensive understanding to the reader. Analytical formulations based on the experimental results were provided and the present experimental data is compared with the data of Indian sandy soils from the literature. Furthermore, a seismic ground response study has been performed to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed formulations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kumar, S.S., Murali Krishna, A., Dey, A.: Parameters influencing dynamic soil properties: a review treatise. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. 3, 47–60 (2014)
Hardin, B.O., Richart, F.E.: Elastic wave velocities in granular soils. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 89, 33–65 (1963)
Vucetic, M.: Cyclic threshold shear strains in soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 120, 2208–2228 (1995)
Kramer, S.L.: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, 1st edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1996)
Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M.: Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97, 1249–1273 (1971)
Seed, H.B., Lee, K.L.: Liquefaction of saturated sands during cyclic loading. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 92, 105–134 (1966)
Idriss, I.M., Boulanger, R.W.: Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 26, 115–130 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.023
Andrus, R., Stokoe, K.H.: Liquefaction resistance of soils from shearwave velocity. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 126, 1015–1025 (2000)
Krishna, A.M., Madhav, M.R.: Engineering of ground for liquefaction mitigation using granular columnar inclusions: recent developments. Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2, 526–536 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2009.526.536
Arany, L., Bhattacharya, S., Macdonald, J.H.G., Hogan, S.J.: Closed form solution of Eigen frequency of monopile supported offshore wind turbines in deeper waters incorporating stiffness of substructure and SSI. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 83, 18–32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.011
Wu, G., Finn, W.D.L.: Dynamic nonlinear analysis of pile foundations using finite element method in the time domain. 3, 44–52 (1997)
Mondal, G., Prashant, A., Jain, S.K.: Simplified seismic analysis of soil-well-pier system for bridges. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 32, 42–55 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.08.002
Phillips, C., Hashash, Y.M.A.: Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 29, 1143–1158 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.01.004
Dammala, P.K., Krishna, A.M., Bhattacharya, S., et al.: Dynamic soil properties for seismic ground response studies in Northeastern India. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 100, 357–370 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.003
Pain, A., Choudhury, D., Bhattacharyya, S.K.: Effect of dynamic soil properties and frequency content of harmonic excitation on the internal stability of reinforced soil retaining structure. Geotext. Geomembr. 45, 471–486 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.07.003
Krishna, A., Bhattacharjee, A.: Behavior of rigid-faced reinforced soil-retaining walls subjected to different earthquake ground motions. Int. J. Geomech. 17, 6016007 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000668
Dash, S.R., Govindaraju, L., Bhattacharya, S.: A case study of damages of the Kandla Port and Customs Office tower supported on a mat-pile foundation in liquefied soils under the 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 29, 333–346 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.03.004
Sarkar, R., Bhattacharya, S., Maheshwari, B.K.: Seismic requalification of pile foundations in liquefiable soils. 44, 183–195 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-014-0112-8
Dammala, P.K., Bhattacharya, S., Krishna, A.M., et al.: Scenario based seismic re-qualification of caisson supported major bridges? A case study of Saraighat Bridge. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 100, 270–275 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.005
Park, C.B., Miller, R.D., Xia, J.: Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics 64, 800–808 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444590
Chung, R., Yokel, F., Drnevich, V.: Evaluation of dynamic properties of sands by resonant column testing. Geotech. Test. J. 7, 60 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10594J
Viggiani, G., Atkinson, J.H.: Interpretation of bender element tests. Geotechnique 149–154 (1995)
El Mohtar, C.S., Drnevich, V.P., Santagata, M., Bobet, A.: Combined resonant column and cyclic triaxial tests for measuring undrained shear modulus reduction of sand with plastic fines. Geotech. Test. J. 36, 1–9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20120129
Kumar, S.S., Krishna, A.M., Dey, A.: Dynamic properties and liquefaction behaviour of cohesive soil in northeast India under staged cyclic loading. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 1–10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.04.004
Drnevich, V.P., Hardin, B.O., Shippy, D.J.: Modulus and damping of soils by the resonant column method. Dyn. Geotech. Test. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. Spec. Tech. Publ. 654(654), 91–125 (1978)
Peacock, W., Seed, H.B.: Sand liquefaction under cyclic loading simple shear conditions. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 94, 689–708 (1968)
Ishihara, K., Li, S.: Liquefaction of saturated sand in triaxial torsion shear test. Soils Found. 12, 19–39 (1972)
Kokusho, T.: Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils Found. 20, 45–59 (1980)
Saran, S.: Soil Dynamics and Machine Foundations. Galhotia Publication, New Delhi, India (1999)
Kashyap, S.S., Krishna, A.M., Dey, A.: Analysis of active MASW test data for a convergent shear wave velocity profile. In: Lehane, A.-M.K. (ed.) Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterisation, Sydney, Australia, pp. 951–956 (2016)
Taipodia, J., Dey, A., Baglari, D.: Influence of data acquisition and signal preprocessing parameters on the resolution of dispersion image from active MASW survey. J. Geophys. Eng. 15, 1310–1326 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2140/aaaf4c
Foti, S., Hollender, F., Garofalo, F., et al.: Guidelines for the good practice of surface wave analysis: a product of the InterPACIFIC project. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 16, 2367–2420 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0206-7
Stokoe, K.H., Woods, R.D.: In situ shear wave velocity by cross-hole method. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98, 443–460 (1972)
Garofalo, F., Foti, S., Hollender, F., et al.: InterPACIFIC project: comparison of invasive and non-invasive methods for seismic site characterization. Part I: Intra-comparison of surface wave methods. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 82, 222–240 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.010
Garofalo, F., Foti, S., Hollender, F., et al.: InterPACIFIC project: comparison of invasive and non-invasive methods for seismic site characterization. Part II: Inter-comparison between surface-wave and borehole methods. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 82, 241–254 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.009
Taipodia, J., Ram, B., Baglari, D., et al.: Geophysical investigations for identification of subsurface. In: Indian Geotechnical Conference. JNTU, Kakinada (2014)
Lawrence, F.J.: Propagation velocity of ultrasonic waves through sand (1963)
Shirley, D.J., Hampton, L.D., Shirley, D.J., Hampton, L.D.: Shear-wave measurements in laboratory sediments. J. Accoustical Soc. Am. 63, 607–613 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381760
Shirley, D.J.: An improved shear wave transducer. J. Accoustical Soc. Am. 63, 163–1645 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381866
Arulnathan, R., Boulanger, R.W., Riemer, M.: Analysis of bender element tests. Geotech. Test. J. 21, 120–131 (1998)
Kumar, S.S., Krishna, A.M., Dey, A.: Evaluation of dynamic properties of sandy soil at high cyclic strains. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 99, 157–167 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.016
Iida, K.: The velocity of elastic waves in sand. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. 16, 131–145 (1938)
Hardin, B.O.: Suggested Methods of Test for Shear Modulus and Damping of Soils by the Resonant Column, pp. 516–529 (1970)
Selig, E., Chung, R., Yokel, F., Drnevich, V.: Evaluation of dynamic properties of sands by resonant column testing. Geotech. Test. J. 7, 60 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10594J
ASTM D4015: Standard Test Methods for Modulus and Damping of Soils by Resonant-Column, pp. 1–22 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1520/d4015-07.1
Hall, J.R., Richart Jr., F.: Dissipation of elastic wave energy in granular soils. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 89, 27–56 (1963)
Woods, R.D.: Measurement of dynamic soil properties: a state of the art. In: Proceedings of American Society of Civil Engineers Special Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Pasadena, pp. 91–180 (1978)
Hardin, B.O., Music, J.: Apparatus for vibration of soil specimens during the triaxial test. ASTM STP 392, 55–74 (1965)
Dammala, P.K., Kumar, S.S., Krishna, A.M., Bhattacharya, S.: Dynamic soil properties and liquefaction potential of northeast Indian soil for effective stress analysis. Bull. Earthq. Eng. (under review)
Sitharam, T., Govindaraju, L., Sridharan, A.: Dynamic properties and liquefaction potential of soils. Curr. Sci. 87:1370–1378 (2004)
Lombardi, D., Bhattacharya, S., Hyodo, M., Kaneko, T.: Undrained behaviour of two silica sands and practical implications for modelling SSI in liquefiable soils. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 66, 293–304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.07.010
Kumar, S., Krishna, A., Dey, A.: High strain dynamic properties of perfectly dry and saturated cohesionless soil. Indian Geotech. J. 1–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0255-5
Kumar, S.S., Dey, A., Krishna, A.M.: Response of saturated cohesionless soil subjected to irregular seismic excitations. Nat. Hazards 93, 509–529 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3312-1
ASTM D3999: Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. 91, 1–16 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1520/d3999-11e01.1.6
ASTM D5311: Standard test method for load controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soil. Astm D5311 92, 1–11 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1520/d5311
Kjellman, W.: Testing the shear strength of clay in Sweden. Geotechnique 2, 225–232 (1951)
Bjerrum, L., Landva, A.: Direct simple shear tests on a Norwegian quick clay. Geotechnique 16, 1–20 (1966)
Lanzo, G., Vucetic, M., Doroudian, M.: Reduction of shear modulus at small strains in simple shear. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123, 1035–1042 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1997)123:11(1035)
Dammala, P.K., Adapa, M.K., Bhattacharya, S., Aingaran, S.: Cyclic response of cohesionless soil using cyclic simple shear testing. In: 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, ICRAGEE, pp. 1–10 (2016)
Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M.: Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis (1970)
Darendeli, M.: Development of a New Family of Normalized Modulus Reduction and Material Damping. University of Texas (2001)
Kumar, S.S., Adapa, M.K., Dey, A.: Importance of site-specific dynamic soil properties for seismic ground response studies. Int. J. Geotech. Earthq. Eng. (2018) (In press)
Bai, L.: Preloading Effects on Dynamic Sand Behavior by Resonant Column Tests. Technischen Universität, Berlin (2011)
Hardin, B.O.: The nature of stress-strain behavior of soils. In: Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. ASCE, Pasadena, CA, pp. 3–90 (1978)
Chattaraj, R., Sengupta, A.: Liquefaction potential and strain dependent dynamic properties of Kasai River sand. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 90, 467–475 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.023
Saxena, S.K., Reddy, K.R.: Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for Monterey No.0 sand by resonant column tests. Soils Found. 29, 37–51 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.29.2_37
Hardin, B.O., Drnevich, V.P.: Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. SM7, 667–692 (1972)
Ishibashi, I., Zhang, X.: Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay. Soils Found. Jpn. Soc. Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 33, 182–191 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.37.3229
Zhang, J., Andrus, R.D., Juang, C.H.: Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131, 453–464 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131:4(453)
Vardanega, P.J., Ph, D., Asce, M., et al.: Stiffness of clays and silts: normalizing shear modulus and shear strain. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 9, 1575–1589 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000887
Matasovic, N., Vucetic, M.: Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 119, 1805–1822 (1994)
Hashash, Y.M., Dashti, S., Romero, M.I., et al.: Evaluation of 1-D seismic site response modeling of sand using centrifuge experiments. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 78, 19–31 (2015)
Dobry, R., Pierce, W., Dyvik, R., et al.: Pore Pressure Model for Cyclic Straining of Sand. Troy, NY (1985)
Martin, G., Finn, W., Seed, H.: Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading. J. Geotech. Div. 101, 423–438 (1975)
Byrne, P.: A cyclic shear-volume coupling and pore-pressure model for sand. In: Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri, pp. 47–55 (1991)
Hashash, Y.M.A., Musgrouve, M.I., Harmon, J.A., et al.: DEEPSOIL 6.1, User Manual (2016)
Vucetic, M., Dobry, R.: Cyclic triaxial strain-controlled testing of liquefiable sands. In: Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, pp. 475–485 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1520/stp29093s
Kirar, B., Maheshwari, B.K.: Dynamic properties of soils at large strains in Roorkee region using field and laboratory tests. Indian Geotech. J. 48, 125–141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0258-2
Maheshwari, B.K., Kirar, B.: Dynamic properties of soils at low strains in Roorkee region using resonant column tests. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 6362, 1–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1365474
Dutta, T.T., Saride, S.: Influence of shear strain on the Poisson’s ratio of clean sands. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 34, 1359–1373 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0047-1
Park, D., Hashash, Y.M.A.: Rate-dependent soil behavior in seismic site response analysis. Can. Geotech. J. 45, 454–469 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-090
Hashash, Y.M., Groholski, D.R.: Recent advances in non-linear site response analysis. In: Fifth International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Symposium, Honor Profr IM Idriss, vol. 29, pp. 1–22 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.12.004
Basu, D., Dey, A., Kumar, S.S.: One-dimensional effective stress non-Masing nonlinear ground response analysis of IIT Guwahati. Int. J. Geotech. Earthq. Eng. 8, 1–27 (2017)
Kumar, S.S., Krishna, A.M.: Importance of site-specific dynamic soil properties for seismic ground response studies. Importance of site-specific dynamic soil properties for seismic ground response studies. Int. J. Geotech. Earthq. Eng. 9, 1–21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGEE.2018010105
IS:1893: Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Indian Stand. 1–44 (2002)
Ajom, B.E., Bhattacharjee, A.: Seismic re-qualification of Caisson supported Dhansiri River Bridge. In: Tunneling in Soft Ground, Ground Conditioning and Modification Techniques, pp 187–203 (2019)
Raghu Kanth, S.T.G., Sreelatha, S., Dash, S.K.: Ground motion estimation at Guwahati city for an Mw 8.1 earthquake in the Shillong plateau. Tectonophysics 448, 98–114 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.11.028
Kumar, A., Harinarayan, N.H., Baro, O.: High amplification factor for low amplitude ground motion: assessment for Delhi. Disaster Adv. 8, 1–11 (2015)
Romero, S.M., Rix, G.: Ground Motion Amplification of Soils in the Upper Mississippi Embayment. MAE Center CD Release 05-01 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dammala, P.K., Murali Krishna, A. (2019). Dynamic Characterization of Soils Using Various Methods for Seismic Site Response Studies. In: Latha G., M. (eds) Frontiers in Geotechnical Engineering. Developments in Geotechnical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5871-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5871-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5870-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5871-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)