Skip to main content

The Material (Re)Turn—to Mental Health

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 603 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the theoretical thread that weaves through the story—a move to an ontology of becoming and process-relational philosophy—and unpacks how traditional and contemporary philosophies such as, posthumanism, animism, externalism and new materialisms are reshaping the environmental humanities. In turn, these ‘ontologies of immanence’ can restyle current thinking in the field of mental health and wellbeing, as recent ground-breaking work on ‘assemblages of health’ suggests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘The concept ‘haecceity’ is taken from the medieval philosopher Duns Scotus to mean a “nonpersonal individuation of a body” (Bonta & Protevi, 2004, p. 94; Mcphie, 2014, n.p.) or a thing’s thisness as opposed to a quiddity—a thing’s whatness.

  2. 2.

    Maggie MacLure (2013) defines post-structuralism as ‘an opposition to the rationalist, humanist worldview that is the (continuing) legacy of the seventeenth-century “Enlightenment” […] asserting that truths are always partial, and knowledge always “situated”—in other words, produced by and for particular interests, in particular circumstances, at particular times […] poststructuralism decentres and dis-assembles the humanist subject—the thinking, self-aware, truth-seeking individual (“man”), who is able to master both “his” own internal passions, and the physical world around him, through the exercise of reason’ (p. 167).

  3. 3.

    Object Oriented Ontology (OOO) was born on the back of Bogost, Harman, Bryant, Meillassoux and Morton and argues that objects, in whatever form they take, are mutually autonomous and epistemologically inaccessible.

  4. 4.

    Following Iovino and Oppermann’s recent work, ‘Material ecocriticism is the study of the expressive dynamics of nature’s constituents, or narrative agencies of storied matter at every scale of being in their mutual entanglements. It seeks to explore the narrative dimension of the material world in terms of the stories embodied in material formations’ (Oppermann, 2013, p. 57).

  5. 5.

    Feminist new materialisms focus on ‘how the forces of matter and the processes of organic life contribute to the play of power or provide elements or modes of resistance to it’ (Frost, 2011, p. 70). It is neither anti-biological nor does it turn to biology as the master plan, dismissive of other onto-epistemologies (Ahmed, 2008; Hinton & van der Tuin, 2014; Sullivan, 2012). Taylor and Ivinson (2013) point out that ‘“new” material feminisms displace the human as the principal ground for knowledge […] and accepts that matter is alive’ (p. 666). There is a ‘priority given to difference, entanglement and undecidability’ as it challenges ‘the distance, separation and categorical assurance that shores up the self-mastery of the oedipal (male) subject of humanism’ (MacLure, 2015, p. 5).

  6. 6.

    ‘Topology focuses on the […] inherent connectivity of objects while ignoring their detailed form. Because of this abstraction from the detailed form, it is possible to define the “objects” of topology as “topological spaces”’ (Braungardt, 2016, para. 3).

  7. 7.

    I say ‘his’ on purpose due to the ‘humanistic arrogance of continuing to place Man at the centre of world history’ (Braidotti, 2013, p. 23).

  8. 8.

    In How To Do Things with Words, Austin objected to ‘the logical positivists’ focus on the verifiability of statements’ and so ‘introduced the performative as a new category of utterance that has no truth value since it does not describe the world, but acts upon it—a way of “doing things with words”’ (Hall, 2000, p. 184). For example, Butler’s (1990) notion of ‘performativity’ attends to the capacity of communication and speech to perform and even define identity as there is no pre-discursive identity. ‘[E]ven our understanding of biological sex is discursively produced. This perspective puts more weight on the speech event itself, requiring us to examine how speakers manipulate ideologies of feminine and masculine speech in the ongoing production of gendered selves’ (Hall, 2000, p. 186).

  9. 9.

    Rhizomes are horizontal root structures of plants (e.g. turmeric or ginger).

  10. 10.

    ‘If what you are trying to explain is a given piece of behavior, such as the locomotion of the blind man, then for this purpose, you will need the street, the stick, the man, the street, the stick, and so on, round and round’ (Bateson, 2000, p. 459).

  11. 11.

    See Ingold’s (2011) ‘When ANT meets SPIDER’ for an in-depth critique of Latour’s Actor Network Theory.

  12. 12.

    ‘[R]elations of exteriority imply that the properties of the component parts can never explain the relations which constitute the whole’ (de Vega, n.d., p. 10).

  13. 13.

    ‘Striated space’ is a Deleuzian term that infers many points of metric reference (dot-to-dot) and is formulated on an optic grid pattern. Striation produces homogeneity and is negatively motivated by anxiety (Deleuze & Guattari, 2004). Conversely, ‘smooth space’ is haptic, formless and vectorial.

  14. 14.

    ‘The body-with-organs is the focus for economic and political activity, for the disciplines of modernity and for the stratification of society by gender, ethnicity and age’ (Fox, 2011, n.p., emphasis added).

  15. 15.

    ‘The body-without-organs emerges from a sea of relations that may be physical, psychological or cultural. This approach decentres the biological aspects of embodiment, while retaining biology and physicality as a (necessary but not privileged) component of the body’ (Fox, 2011, n.p., emphasis added).

  16. 16.

    An ecotone is the transitional terrain between/joining two biomes.

References

  • Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The Bounds of Cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The Bounds of Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2010). Defending the Bounds of Cognition. In R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (pp. 67–80). Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2008). Imaginary Prohibitions: Some Preliminary Remarks on the Founding Gestures of the ‘New Materialism’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15(1), 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambedkar Age Collective. (2015). Hatred in the Belly: Politics Behind the Appropriation of Dr Ambedkar’s Writings. Hyderabad, India: The Shared Mirror.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and Geography. Area, 43(2), 124–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2012). What Is the Measure of Nothingness? Infinity, Virtuality, Justice. 100 Notes-100 Thoughts, No. 99. Ostfildern, Germany: Erschienen im Hatje Cantz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2004). The Force of Things: Steps Toward an Ecology of Matter. Political Theory, 32(3), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benozzo, A., Carey, N., Cozza, M., Elmenhorst, C., Fairchild, N., Koro-Ljungberg, M., et al. (2018). Disturbing the Academic Conference Machine: Post-qualitative Re-turnings. Gender, Work and Organization. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12260

  • Bogost, I. (2012). Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, M., & Protevi, J. (2004). Deleuze and Geophilosophy: A Guide and Glossary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK & Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R., & Dolphijn, R. (2015). Introduction: Deleuze’s Philosophy and the Art of Life or: What Does Pussy Riot Know? In R. Braidotti & R. Dolphijn (Eds.), This Deleuzian Century: Art, Activism, Life (pp. 13–36). Amsterdam & New York: Brill | Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, B. (2004). Querying Posthumanisms. Geoforum, 35, 269–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braungardt, J. (2016). Philosophical Explorations: Topology. Retrieved from http://braungardt.trialectics.com/mathematics/topology/

  • Bryant, L. R. (2011). The Ethics of the Event: Deleuze and Ethics Without Aρχή. In N. Jun & D. W. Smith (Eds.), Deleuze and Ethics (pp. 21–43). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (2010). The Extended Mind. In R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (pp. 27–42). Cambridge, MA, & London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. A., & Mcphie, J. (2015). From Places to Paths: Learning for Sustainability, Teacher Education and a Philosophy of Becoming. Environmental Education Research, 22(7), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Introduction: Deleuze and Research Methodologies. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and Research Methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira Andreotti, V. (2016). (Re)imagining Education as an Un-coercive Re-arrangement of Desires. Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 5(1), 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vega, E. P. (n.d.). Questioning the Bounds of Cognition: Mind as an Assemblage. Retrieved from http://www.eistudio.net/eiWRITINGS/epdvs_QuestioningBoundsOfCognition.pdf

  • DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations: 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2002). Dialogues II (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). Revised Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, J. (2011). Psychoanalysis and Ecology at the Edge of Chaos: Complexity Theory, Deleuze|Guattari and Psychoanalysis for a Climate in Crisis. Hove, East Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doel, M. A. (2000). Un-glunking Geography: Spatial Science After Dr Suess and Gilles Deleuze. In M. Crang & N. Thrift (Eds.), Thinking Space. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library; Open Humanities Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, C. (2014). Assemblages of Health: Deleuze’s Empiricism and the Ethology of Life. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York & London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. J. (2011). The Ill-Health Assemblage: Beyond the Body-with-Organs. Health Sociology Review, 20(4), 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2014). New Materialist Social Inquiry: Designs, Methods and the Research-Assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, S. (2011). The Implications of the New Materialisms for Feminist Epistemology. In H. E. Grasswick (Ed.), Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge (pp. 69–83). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London & New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, K., & Wyatt, J. (2009). Between the Two: A Nomadic Inquiry into Collaborative Writing and Subjectivity. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, K., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Deleuze and Collaborative Writing as Method of Inquiry. BERA 2010 Masterclass. Retrieved from www.beraconference.co.uk/2010/downloads/masterclasses/Bera-Masterclass-4.doc

  • Grant, A., Short, N., & Turner, L. (2013). Introduction: Storying Life and Lives. In N. Short, L. Turner, & A. Grant (Eds.), Contemporary British Autoethnography (pp. 1–16). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. J. (1997). Exploring the World of the Druids. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenz, S. J. (1996). A Primer on Postmodernism. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J. (2015). Found Spaces and Material Memory: Remarks on the Thickness of Time in Architecture. In M. Mindrup (Ed.), The Material Imagination: Reveries on Architecture and Matter. Farnham, UK & Burlington, NJ: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. (2000). Performativity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1–2), 184–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1994). A Game of Cat’s Cradle: Science Studies, Feminist Theory, Cultural Studies. Configurations, 2(1), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2004). The Haraway Reader. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2013). Sawyer Seminar: The Challenge of Animism. Indigenous Cosmopolitics: Dialogues About the Reconstitution of Worlds. 20 May 2013 at UC Davis. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSqCwA5Mc-4

  • Harding, S. (2006). Animate Earth: Science, Intuition and Gaia. Cambridge: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G. (2006). Animism: Respecting the Living World. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G. (Ed.). (2013). The Handbook of Contemporary Animism. Handbooks on Contemporary Religion. Durham: Acumen Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, P., & van der Tuin, I. (2014). Preface. Women: A Cultural Review, 25(1), 1–8. Special Issue ‘Feminist Matters: The Politics of New Materialism’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1993). The Reindeerman’s Lasso. In P. Lemmonier (Ed.), Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Cultures Since the Neolithic (pp. 108–125). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A Brief History. Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2012). Toward an Ecology of Materials. Annual Review of Anthropology., 41, 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2013). Being Alive to a World Without Objects. In G. Harvey (Ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Animism (pp. 213–225). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2015). The Life of Lines. London & New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iovino, S. (2012). Material Ecocriticism: Matter, Text, and Posthuman Ethics. In T. Müller & M. Sauter (Eds.), Literature, Ecology, Ethics (pp. 51–68). Heidelberg: Winter Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivakhiv, A. (2013). Ecologies of the Moving Image: Cinema, Affect, Nature. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2008). Experience and “I” in Autoethnography. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1(3), 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, N. (2011a). Introduction. In N. Jun & D. W. Smith (Eds.), Deleuze and Ethics (pp. 1–4). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, N. (2011b). Deleuze, Values, and Normativity. In N. Jun & D. W. Smith (Eds.), Deleuze and Ethics (pp. 89–107). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knappett, C., & Malafouris, L. (2008). Material and Nonhuman Agency: An Introduction. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach (pp. ix–xix). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLure, M. (2013). Researching Without Representation? Language and Materiality in Post-qualitative Methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLure, M. (2015). The ‘New Materialisms’: A Thorn in the Flesh of Critical Qualitative Inquiry? In G. Cannella, M. S. Perez, & P. Pasque (Eds.), Critical Qualitative Inquiry: Foundations and Futures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press. Retrieved from http://www.e-space.mmu.ac.uk/e-space/bitstream/2173/596897/3/post-criticalLATEST.pdf

  • Malafouris, L. (2008). At the Potter’s Wheel: An Argument for Material Agency. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach (pp. 19–36). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Malafouris, L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manzotti, R. (2011a). The Spread Mind: Seven Steps to Situated Consciousness. Journal of Cosmology, 14, 1–22. Retrieved from http://journalofcosmology.com/Consciousness143.html

  • Manzotti, R. (Ed.). (2011b). Situated Aesthetics: Art Beyond the Skin. Exeter, UK & Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzotti, R. (2011c). Varieties of Externalism and Aesthetics. In R. Manzotti (Ed.), Situated Aesthetics: Art Beyond the Skin (pp. 15–36). Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masny, D. (2013). Rhizoanalytic Pathways in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(5), 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, K. (2017). Wellbeing Machine: How Health Emerges from the Assemblages of Everyday Life. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcphie, J. (2014). Mr. Messy and the Ghost in the Machine: A Tale of Becoming…A Working-Class Academic (Researching Environ(Mental) Health). Rhizomes.net, 27, n.p.

  • Mcphie, J. (2015). A Last Wolf in England: The Wolf’s Tale. Dark Mountain, 7, 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcphie, J. (2017). Embodied Walls and Extended Skins: Exploring Mental Health Through Tataus and Graffiti. In S. H. Awad & B. Wagoner (Eds.), Street Art of Resistance (pp. 223–250). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mcphie, J. (2018). I Knock at the Stone’s Front Door: Performative Pedagogies Beyond the Human Story. Parallax, 24(3), 306–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcphie, J., & Clarke, D. A. G. (2015). A Walk in the Park: Considering Practice for Outdoor Environmental Education Through an Immanent Take on the Material Turn. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(4), 230–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcphie, J., Hebbourn, K., & Wingfield-Hayes, G. (2016). The Ulverston Connection. Earthlines (Vol. 15, pp. 47–53).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • New Materialism. (2016). New Materialism: Networking European Scholarship on ‘How Matter Comes to Matter’. Retrieved from http://newmaterialism.eu/about

  • Oppermann, S. (2013). Material Ecocriticism and the Creativity of Storied Matter. Frame, 26(2), 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perec, G. (1973). Species of Spaces and Other Pieces. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price-Robertson, R., & Duff, C. (2015). Realism, Materialism, and the Assemblage: Thinking Psychologically with Manuel DeLanda. Theory & Psychology, 26(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. (2013). Theorising Learning and Nature: Post-human Possibilities and Problems. Gender and Education, 25(6), 738–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. (2010). The New Science of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rupert, R. D. (2004). Challenges to the Hypothesis of Extended Cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101(8), 389–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupert, R. D. (2009). Cognitive Systems and the Extended Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarup, M. (1993). An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism. Essex, UK: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, S. (2012). Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolimowski, H. (1994). The Participatory Mind: A New Theory of Knowledge and of the Universe. London: Penguin/Arkana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W. (2011). Deleuze and the Question of Desire: Towards an Immanent Theory of Ethics. In N. Jun & D. W. Smith (Eds.), Deleuze and Ethics (pp. 123–141). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post Qualitative Research: The Critique and the Coming After. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th ed., pp. 611–626). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, N. (2012). The Somatechnics of Perception and the Matter of the Non/Human: A Critical Response to the New Materialism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19(3), 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarragona, M. (2008). Postmodern/Poststructuralist Therapies. In J. L. Lebow (Ed.), Twenty-First Century Psychotherapies: Contemporary Approaches to Theory and Practice (pp. 167–205). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. A. (2013). Objects, Bodies and Space: Gender and Embodied Practices of Mattering in the Classroom. Gender and Education, 25(6), 688–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. A., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material Feminisms: New Directions for Education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, K. (2014). Ethos of Diffraction: New Paradigms for a (Post)humanist Ethics. Parallax, 20(3), 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2008). Non-Representational Theory: Space/Politics/Affect. London & New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van der Tuin, I., & Dolphijn, R. (n.d.). Onto-epistemology. Retrieved from https://newmaterialistscartographies.wikispaces.com/Onto-epistemology

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiecha, K. (2013). New Estimates on the Rate of Global Language Loss. The Rosetta Project. Retrieved from http://rosettaproject.org/blog/02013/mar/28/new-estimates-on-rate-of-language-loss/

  • Wyatt, J. (2013). Ash Wednesdays. In N. Short, L. Turner, & A. Grant (Eds.), Contemporary British Autoethnography (pp. 127–137). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zylinska, J. (2014). Minimal Ethics for the Anthropocene. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press. Goldsmiths Research Online. Retrieved from http://research.gold.ac.uk/10741/1/MED-Zylinska2014.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamie Mcphie .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mcphie, J. (2019). The Material (Re)Turn—to Mental Health. In: Mental Health and Wellbeing in the Anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3326-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3326-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3325-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3326-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics