Abstract
To understand the organization of social learning by groups in practice, this chapter elaborates on the use of a framework of dimensions and indicators to explore social learning within (prospective) teacher groups. The applied framework that we call the ‘Dimensions of Social Learning (DSL) Framework’ is built upon four dimensions including 11 indicators corresponding to these dimensions. The DSL Framework was prompted by a literature review that applied notions of social networks, communities of practice and learning teams as the main underlying perspectives and has been tested empirically in higher education. In this chapter, to validate the framework, we present the findings of a case study that applied the DSL Framework to explore the social dimensions of particular teacher learning groups and to reflect on the usefulness of the indicators in terms of compiling an image of the learning group’s social configuration. The case study suggests that the framework appears fruitful for assessing the social configuration of teacher learning groups. Moreover, the resulting image allows teachers to analyse whether their group’s configuration fits its learning goals, or whether adjustments are required. It is therefore possible to improve learning processes within teacher learning groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agterberg, M., Van den Hooff, B., Huysman, M., & Soekijad, M. (2009). Keeping the wheels turning: The dynamics of managing networks of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 85–108.
Akkerman, S., Petter, C., & De Laat, M. (2008). Organizing communities-of-practice: Facilitating emergence. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(6), 383–399.
Baker-Doyle, K., & Yoon, S. A. (2010). Urban teacher support networks. Social Network Theory and Educational Change, 115–126.
Barak, J., Gidron, A., & Turniansky, B. (2010). ‘Without stones there is no arch’: A study of professional development of teacher educators as a team. Professional Development in Education, 36(1–2), 275–287.
Bornat, J. (2008). Biographical methods. In P. Alasuutari, P. L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social research methods (pp. 344–356). London: Sage.
Boud, D., & Hager, P. (2012). Re-thinking continuing professional development through changing metaphors and location in professional practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(1), 17–30.
Büchel, B., & Raub, S. (2002). Building knowledge-creating value networks. European Management Journal, 20(6), 587–596.
Carmichael, P., Fox, A., McCormick, R., Procter, R., & Honour, L. (2006). Teachers’ networks in and out of school. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 217–227.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.
Cross, R. L., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Harvard: Harvard Business Press.
Cross, R., Parker, A., & Sasson, L. (Eds.). (2003). Networks in the knowledge economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Laat, M. (2012). Enabling professional development networks: How connected are you? Heerlen: LOOK, Open University of the Netherlands.
Dobber (2011). Collaboration in groups during teacher education. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Doppenberg, J., Bakx, A., & Den Brok, P. (2012). Collaborative teacher learning in different primary school settings. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(5), 547–566.
Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2014). The Distant Crowd. International Journal of Learning and Media, 4, 3.
Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 113–117.
Hanraets, I., Hulsebosch, J., & De Laat, M. (2011). Experiences of pioneers facilitating teacher networks for professional development. Educational Media International, 48(2), 85–99.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6(2), 151–182.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press.
Haythornthwaite, C., & De Laat, M. (2012). Social network informed design for learning with educational technology. In A. D. Olofsson & J. O. Lindberg (Eds.), Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 352–394). New York: Amazon.
Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Improving schoolteachers’ workplace learning. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 109–131.
Hornby, G. (2009). The effectiveness of cooperative learning with trainee teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 32(5), 161–168.
Katz, S., & Earl, L. (2010). Learning about networked learning communities. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 27–53.
Knight, P. (2002). A systemic approach to professional development: Learning as practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3), 229–241.
Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477.
Lave, J. (2012). Changing practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 156–171.
Leh, A., Kouba, B., & Davis, D. (2005). Twenty-first century learning: Communities, interaction and ubiquitous computing. Educational Media International, 42(3), 237–250.
Lohman, M. C. (2006). Factors influencing teachers’ engagement in informal learning activities. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(3), 141–156.
Marsick, V. J., & Volpe, M. (1999). The nature and need for informal learning. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 1(3), 1–9.
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 25–34.
Meirink, J., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 161–181.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
Pahor, M., Škerlavaj, M., & Dimovski, V. (2008). Evidence for the network perspective on organizational learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1985–1994.
Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 905–947).
Schreurs, B., Van den Beemt, A., Prinsen, F., Witthaus, G., Conole, G., & De Laat, M. (2014). An investigation into social learning activities by practitioners in open educational practices. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(4), 1–20.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modelling. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 7–25.
Van den Beemt, A., & Diepstraten, I. (2016). Teacher perspectives on ICT: A learning ecology approach. Computers & Education, 92–93, 161–170.
Van den Beemt, A., Vrieling, E., & De Laat, M. (2015). Toepassing en validering van het ‘Dimensies van Sociaal Leren’-raamwerk. [Application and validation of the ‘Dimensions of Social Learning’ Framework]. Paper presented at the 2015 Dutch Educational Research Conference, Leiden, Netherlands
Van Emmerik, I. J. H., Jawahar, I. M., Schreurs, B., & De Cuyper, N. (2011). Social capital, team efficacy and team potency. The mediating role of team learning behaviors. Career Development International, 16(1), 82–99.
Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Vrieling, E. M. (2012). Promoting self-regulated learning in primary teacher education. Doctoral dissertation, Open University, The Netherlands.
Vrieling, E. M., Bastiaens, Th. J., & Stijnen, P. J. J. (2010). Process-oriented design principles for promoting self-regulated learning in primary teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(4–5), 141–150.
Vrieling, E., van den Beemt, A., & de Laat, M. (2015). What’s in a name dimensions of social learning in teacher groups. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1058588.
Vrieling, E., van den Beemt, A., de Laat, M. (2014). Dimensies en indicatoren van sociaal leren in een pabo leernetwerk [Dimensions and indicators of social learning within a pre-service teacher education network]. Paper presented at the 2014 Dutch Educational Research Conference, Groningen, Netherlands.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: University Press.
Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & De Laat, M. (2011). Telling stories about the value of communities and networks: A toolkit. Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Laat, M., Vrieling, E., van den Beemt, A. (2017). Facilitation of Social Learning in Teacher Education: The ‘Dimensions of Social Learning Framework’. In: McDonald, J., Cater-Steel, A. (eds) Communities of Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2877-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2879-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)