Skip to main content

Human Insecurities in Southeast Asia: Impediments to Achieving a People-Oriented ASEAN

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Human Insecurities in Southeast Asia

Part of the book series: Asia in Transition ((AT,volume 5))

  • 452 Accesses

Abstract

In 2003, ASEAN issued the Bali Concord II. In this declaration, ASEAN pledged to create the ASEAN Community (AC). One of the AC’s goals is to address Southeast Asian human insecurities and eventually achieve a people-oriented ASEAN, manifested in the blueprints of the ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC) and the ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC). This chapter argues that a significant impediment to achieving a people-oriented ASEAN is the ASEAN Way, which ASEAN embedded in its roadmaps for the AC-building and AC-operating processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ASEAN was established in 1967 by its original members Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. Brunei and Vietnam joined the association in 1984 and 1995, respectively. Laos and Myanmar joined in 1997, and the latest member—Cambodia—joined in 1999.

  2. 2.

    At the 12th ASEAN Summit, held in the Philippines in January 2007, ASEAN leaders agreed to push forward the realization of the AC from 2020 to 2015.

  3. 3.

    In 2008, ASEAN declared at the 13th ASEAN Summit that the ASC would henceforth be the ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC).

  4. 4.

    Because the principle of nonuse of force is not a controversial element in the ASEAN Way, analysis of the ASEAN Way in this chapter will focus on the nonbinding mechanism and the principle of noninterference.

  5. 5.

    Between 1941 and 1945, the Japanese militarily occupied Southeast Asia, extracting natural resources from the region.

  6. 6.

    In addition, ASEAN issued several human-rights declarations: the Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers (January 2007), the Declaration on the Enhancement of Welfare and Development of ASEAN Women and Children (October 2010), the Declaration on the Enhancement of the Role and Participation of the Persons with Disabilities in ASEAN Community (November 2011), and the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (November 2012).

  7. 7.

    The number of CSOs in Southeast Asia spiraled up from 6558 to 11,270, of which a relative majority were hosted by Malaysia and Indonesia (Chandra 2004, p. 159).

  8. 8.

    It should be noted here that ASEAN newcomers have not tolerated CSO intervention in ASEAN’s agendas. For example, in 2012, when Cambodia assumed ASEAN’s chairmanship, the ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ACSC) planned to hold workshops in the Lucky Star Hotel in Cambodia’s capital city of Phnom Penh to discuss human-rights issues and human insecurities, like land grabbing; however, the hotel threatened to cut power to conference rooms and to change padlocks on conference rooms if the workshops went ahead (Gerard 2014, p. 121). CSOs in the ACSC suspected that the Cambodian government was the mastermind behind objections to the ACSC’s activities (Gerard 2014, p. 121).

References

  • Acharya, A. (1998). “Culture, Security, Multilateralism: The ‘ASEAN Way’ and Regional Order.” Contemporary Security Policy, 19:1, pp. 55-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. (2007). Promoting Human Security: Ethical, Normative and Educational Frameworks in Southeast Asia. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. (2009). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • AICHR. (2015). “Guidelines of the AICHR’s Relations with Civil Society Organisations”. February 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN Secretariat. (1976a). Declaration of ASEAN Concord. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN Secretariat. (1976b). Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN Secretariat. (1993). Joint Communique of the Twenty-Sixth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN Secretariat. (2003). Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II). Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN Secretariat. (2007). The ASEAN Charter. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN Secretariat. (2009a). ASEAN Political–Security Community Blueprint. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN Secretariat. (2009b). ASEAN Socio–Cultural Community Blueprint. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN Secretariat. (2009c). Terms of the Reference of ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN Secretariat. (2015). Chairman’s Statement of the 27 th ASEAN Summit. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, G. (1979). The Boat People and the Road People: Refugees of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Middx, Quartermaine House Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviel, J. F. (2000). “Placing Human Rights and Environmental Issues on ASEAN’s Agenda: the Role of Non-Governmental Organizations.” Asian Journal of Political Science, 8:2, pp. 17-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. & C. Drummond (2011). “The Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia: between Noninterference and Sovereignty as Responsibility.” The Pacific Review, 24:2, pp. 179-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, N. (1999). “Constructivism and Southeast Asian Security.” The Pacific Review, 12:1, pp. 39-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for Interantional Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (2008a). “Non-Traditional Security and Infectious Diseases in ASEAN: Going Beyond the Rhetoric in ASEAN: Going beyond the Rhetoric of Securitization to Deeper Institutionalization.” The Pacific Review, 21:4, pp. 507-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (2008b). “The ASEAN Charter: An Opportunity Missed or One that Cannot Be Bissed?” Southeast Asian Affairs, 2008, pp. 71-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (2012). “The Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia: Opening up Spaces for Advancing Human Security.” The Pacific Review, 25:1, pp. 113-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, A. C. (2004). “Indonesia’s Non–State Actors in ASEAN: A New Regionalism Agenda for Southeast Asia?” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 26:1, pp. 155-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSOs. (2014). “Civil Society’s Recommendations to the ASEAN Ministers Meeting (AMM) in the Review and Amendment of the Terms of Reference (ToR) of the ASEAN Inter-Governmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR).” July 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosch, J. (2003). “Changing Security Cultures in Europe and Southeast Asia: Implications for Inter-Regionalism.” Asia Europe Journal, 1:4, pp. 483-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, A. (2000). “ASEAN’s Response to the East Timor Crisis.” Australian Journal of International Affairs, 54:2, pp. 163-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, L. (2003). “ASEAN and Environmental Cooperation: Norms, Interests and Identity.” The Pacific Review, 16:1, pp. 29-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmers, R. (2003). “ASEAN and the Securitization of Transnational Crime in Southeast Asia.” The Pacific Review, 16:3, pp. 419-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmers, R. (2005). “The Indochinese Enlargement of ASEAN: Security Expectations and Outcomes.” Australian Journal of International Affairs, 59:1, pp. 71-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, K. (2014). ASEAN’s Engagement of Civil Society: Regulating Dissent, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haacke, J. (2003). “ASEAN’s Diplomatic and Security Culture: a Contructivist Assessment.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 3, pp. 57-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haacke, J. (2006). Myanmar’s Foreign Policy: Domestic Influences and International Implications, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, B.. & K. Sims (2011). “Human Security and Development in the Lao PDR.” Asian Survey, 51:2, pp. 333-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakarta Post, (2007). ‘RI to Push Human Rights in ASEAN Charter’, January 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Lee. (2012). ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsumata, H. (2004). “Why is ASEAN Diplomacy Changing? From ‘Non-Interference’ to ‘Open and Frank Discussions’.” Asian Survey, 44:2, pp. 237-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, T. (2008). ASEAN at Forty: Perception and Reality. In: Nair, D. & Onn, L. P. (eds.) Regional Outlook Southeast Asia 2008–2009. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asia Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, H. (2012). “R2P by Increments: the AICHR and Localizing the Reponsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia.” The Pacific Review, 25:1, pp. 27-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, R. (1976). “The Indonesian Takeover of East Timor.” Asian Survey, 16:10, pp. 948-964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, I. & A. Mayer-Rieckh. (2005). “The United Nations and Eas Timor: from Self-Determination to State-Building.” International Peacekeeping, 12:1, pp. 125-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, S. (2009). “Chartering a New Direction? Burma and the Evolution of Human Rights in ASEAN.” Asian Affairs: An American Review, 36:3, pp. 157-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • PhilStar. (2008). “GMA Warns RP Senate Won’t Ratify ASEAN Charter, If Suu Kyi Isn’t freed.” January 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shee, P-K. (1977). “A Decade of ASEAN, 1967–1977.” Asian Survey, 17:8, pp. 753-770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, R. (2008). “The ASEAN Alternative? Ideas, Institutions and the Challenge to ‘Global’ Governance.” The Pacific Review, 21:4, pp. 451-468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadjbakhsh, S. & A.M. Chenoy. (2008). Human Security: Concepts and Implications. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. & W. Tow. (2002). “The Utility of Human Security: Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention.” Security Dialogue, 33:2, pp. 177-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Star. (2007). ‘Syed Albar Says ASEAN is for Human Rights’. July 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Human Development Report 1994. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Security Council. (2006). Resolution 1674, S/RES/1674.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ta-Wei Chu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chu, TW. (2016). Human Insecurities in Southeast Asia: Impediments to Achieving a People-Oriented ASEAN. In: Carnegie, P., King, V., Zawawi Ibrahim (eds) Human Insecurities in Southeast Asia. Asia in Transition, vol 5. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2245-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics