Abstract
In the educational practice of the Swedish preschool, teaching and learning often take place in everyday activities and are intertwined with play and care. This chapter examines how this educational practice is accomplished by a Swedish preschool teacher and three children in interaction. More specifically, the present chapter shows how complex physical concepts are incorporated into early childhood education through a playful seesaw activity. In the analysis of the video-recorded activity, this chapter demonstrates how question-answer sequences function as important interactional and educational resources for the participants when they organize their interaction. Through question-answer sequences, vis-á-vis a seesaw and embodied action, it becomes possible for the preschool teacher to capture and direct the children’s attention towards physical phenomena, in line with the curriculum, as well as create a shared experience of these physical phenomena in playful practice. Thus, this chapter displays how teaching and learning are intertwined with play, in situ, in preschool practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Swedish word “va?” is a very common word that is hard to translate into English. “Va?” in Swedish is often used whenever problems of hearing occur (in order to initiate a repair) and could in that way be translated into a huh. However, “va?” is also used frequently when a question does not receive any (verbal) answer, which is the case here, and I have therefore translated it to a wha.
References
Aarsand, P., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Producing children’s corporeal privacy: Ethnographic video recording as material-discoursive practice. Qualitative Research, 10(2), 249–268.
Bateman, A. (2013). Responding to children’s answers: Questions embedded in the social context of early childhood education. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 33(3), 275–288.
Bellack, A. A., Kliebard, H. M., Hyman, R. T., & Smith, F. L. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Björk-Willén, P. (2008). Routine trouble: How preschool children participate in multilingual instruction. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 555–577.
Björk-Willén, P., & Cromdal, J. (2009). When education seeps into ‘free play’: How preschool children accomplish multilingual education. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1493–1518.
Cekaite, A. (2010). Shepherding the child: Embodied directive sequences in parent-child interactions. Text & Talk, 30(1), 1–25.
Danby, S., & Farrell, A. (2005). Opening the research conversation. In A. Farrell (Ed.), Ethical research with children (pp. 49–67). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Dockett, S., Einarsdottir, J., & Perry, B. (2009). Researching with children: Ethical tensions. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 7(3), 283–298.
Ekström, K. (2007). Förskolans pedagogiska praktik. Ett verksamhetsperspektiv. Diss. Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2007.
Freed, A. F., & Ehrlich, S. (Eds.). (2010). Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, R. (2013). Conversation analysis in the classroom. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 593–611). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jonsson, A. (2011). Nuets didaktik. Förskolans lärare talar om läroplan för de yngsta. Lic.-avh. Kristianstad: Högskolan i Kristianstad, 2011. Kristianstad.
Jonsson, A. (2013). Att skapa läroplan för de yngsta barnen i förskolan. Barns perspektiv och nuets didaktik. Diss. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet, 2013. Göteborg.
Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions. Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Koshik, I. (2010). Questions that convey information in teacher-student conferences. In A. F. Freed, & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Why do you ask? the functions of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 159–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macbeth, D. (2000). Classrooms as installations. Direct instruction in the early grades. In S. Hester, & D. Francis (Eds.), Local educational order. Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action (pp. 21–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Majlesi, A. R., & Broth, M. (2012). Emergent learnables in second language classroom interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 193–207.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Asplund Carlsson, M. (2008). The playing learning child: Towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 623–641.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organisation in interaction: A primer in conversational analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up Closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis. An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
Tate, T. L., Thompson, R. H., & McKerchar, P. M. (2005). Training teachers in an infant classroom to use embedded teaching strategies. Education and treatment of children, 28(3), 206–221.
Waring, H. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824.
Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2011). Pursuing a question: Reinitiating IRE sequences as a method of instruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 475–488.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank the two editors for their careful reading and fruitful comments and also Polly Björk-Willén and Jakob Cromdal for comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dalgren, S. (2017). Questions and Answers, A Seesaw and Embodied Action: How a Preschool Teacher and Children Accomplish Educational Practice. In: Bateman, A., Church, A. (eds) Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1703-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1703-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1701-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1703-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)