Abstract
With the development of the quantitative PCR detection methodologies, different types of PCR techniques have been developed, such as real-time quantitative PCR, competitive real-time PCR, etc. However, all the above techniques only achieve quantitative detection by standard curves and are considered labor-intensive experiments. Based on this background, digital PCR (dPCR), an absolute quantitative detection method, was developed in the 1990s and could achieve quantitative detection without the generation of standard curves. The idea of digital PCR was first raised by Kinzler and Vogelstein in the 1990s based on the limited separation of the original PCR reaction. Digital PCR has the advantage of being highly sensitive, specific, and well stable and having absolute quantitation compared to the original real-time PCR. Over nearly three decades, digital PCR has achieved wide usage in different areas, such as clinical diagnostics, GMO detections, biosensor detections, etc. In this chapter, the background of the development of digital PCR, the concept of digital PCR, and the use of digital PCR in different areas are reviewed in detail. By reading this chapter, the reader could have a better comprehension of all the aspects of digital PCR.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mackay IM, Arden KE, Nitsche A. Real-time PCR in virology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1292–305. doi:10.1093/nar/30.6.1292.
Bustin S, Benes V, Garson J. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009;55:611–22. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797.
Cook L, Atienza EE, Bagabag A, et al. Comparison of methods for extraction of viral DNA from cellular specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;64:37–42. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.01.003.
Lai KK-Y, Cook L, Wendt S, et al. Evaluation of real-time PCR versus PCR with liquid-phase hybridization for detection of enterovirus RNA in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:3133–41. doi:10.1128/JCM.41.7.3133-3141.2003.
Kodama T, Kurosawa Y, Kitta K, et al. Tendency for interlaboratory precision in the GMO analysis method based on real-time PCR. J AOAC Int. 2010;93:734–49.
Fu W, Zhu P, Wang C, et al. A highly sensitive and specific method for the screening detection of genetically modified organisms based on digital PCR without pretreatment. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12715.
Burns MJ, Burrell AM, Foy CA. The applicability of digital PCR for the assessment of detection limits in GMO analysis. Eur Food Res Technol. 2010;231:353–62. doi:10.1007/s00217-010-1277-8.
Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Digital PCR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:9236–41. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.16.9236.
Ge Q, Liu Z, Bai Y, et al. Emulsion PCR-based method to detect Y chromosome microdeletions. Anal Biochem. 2007;367:173–8.
Zhu Z, Jenkins G, Zhang W, et al. Single-molecule emulsion PCR in microfluidic droplets. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;403:2127–43.
Williams R, Peisajovich SG, Miller OJ, et al. Amplification of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR. Nat Methods. 2006;3:545–50.
Shao K, Ding W, Wang F, et al. Emulsion PCR: a high efficient way of PCR amplification of random DNA libraries in aptamer selection. PLoS ONE. 2011;6, e24910.
Corbisier P, Bhat S, Partis L, et al. Absolute quantification of genetically modified MON810 maize (Zea mays L.) by digital polymerase chain reaction. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;396:2143–50.
Demeke T, Gräfenhan T, Holigroski M, et al. Assessment of droplet digital PCR for absolute quantification of genetically engineered OXY235 canola and DP305423 soybean samples. Food Control. 2014;46:470–4.
Morisset D, Štebih D, Milavec M, et al. Quantitative analysis of food and feed samples with droplet digital PCR. PLoS ONE. 2013;8, e62583.
Hori M, Fukano H, Suzuki Y. Uniform amplification of multiple DNAs by emulsion PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;352:323–8.
Nakano M. Single-molecule PCR using water-in-oil emulsion. J Biotechnol. 2003;102:117–24.
Dear PH, Cook PR. Happy mapping: linkage mapping using a physical analogue of meiosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:13–20. doi:10.1093/nar/21.1.13.
Sykes PJ, Neoh SH, Brisco MJ, et al. Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution. Biotechniques. 1992;13:444–9.
Pohl G, Shih I-M. Principle and applications of digital PCR. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2004;4:41–7. doi:10.1586/14737159.4.1.41.
McCaughan F, Dear PH. Single-molecule genomics. J Pathol. 2010;220:297–306. doi:10.1002/path.2647.
Bhat S, Herrmann J, Armishaw P, et al. Single molecule detection in nanofluidic digital array enables accurate measurement of DNA copy number. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009;394:457–67. doi:10.1007/s00216-009-2729-5.
Daser A, Thangavelu M, Pannell R, et al. Interrogation of genomes by molecular copy-number counting (MCC). Nat Methods. 2006;3:447–53. doi:10.1038/nmeth880.
Zhang B, Li M, McDonald T, et al. Microenvironmental protection of CML stem and progenitor cells from tyrosine kinase inhibitors through N-cadherin and Wnt-β-catenin signaling. Blood. 2013;121:1824–38. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-02-412890.
Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, et al. High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Anal Chem. 2011;83:8604–10. doi:10.1021/ac202028g.
Sanders R, Huggett JF, Bushell CA, et al. Evaluation of digital PCR for absolute DNA quantification. Anal Chem. 2011;83:6474–84. doi:10.1021/ac103230c.
Pinheiro LB, Coleman VA, Hindson CM, et al. Evaluation of a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction format for DNA copy number quantification. Anal Chem. 2012;84:1003–11. doi:10.1021/ac202578x.
Bhat S, Herrmann J, Armishaw P, et al. Single molecule detection in nanofluidic digital array enables accurate measurement of DNA copy number. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009;394:457–67.
Spurgeon SL, Jones RC, Ramakrishnan R. High throughput gene expression measurement with real time PCR in a microfluidic dynamic array. PLoS ONE. 2008;3, e1662. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001662.
Morrison T, Hurley J, Garcia J, et al. Nanoliter high throughput quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34, e123. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl639.
Pekin D, Skhiri Y, Baret J-C, et al. Quantitative and sensitive detection of rare mutations using droplet-based microfluidics. Lab Chip. 2011;11:2156–66. doi:10.1039/c1lc20128j.
Diehl F, Li M, He Y, et al. BEAMing: single-molecule PCR on microparticles in water-in-oil emulsions. Nat Methods. 2006;3:551–9. doi:10.1038/nmeth898.
Dressman D, Yan H, Traverso G, et al. Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:8817–22. doi:10.1073/pnas.1133470100.
Hayden RT, Yan X, Wick MT, et al. Factors contributing to variability of quantitative viral PCR results in proficiency testing samples: a multivariate analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:337–45. doi:10.1128/JCM.01287-11.
Hayden RT, Hokanson KM, Pounds SB, et al. Multicenter comparison of different real-time PCR assays for quantitative detection of Epstein-Barr virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:157–63. doi:10.1128/JCM.01252-07.
Hindson CM, Chevillet JR, Briggs HA, et al. Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1003–5. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2633.
Flamand L, Komaroff AL, Arbuckle JH, et al. Review, part 1: human herpesvirus-6-basic biology, diagnostic testing, and antiviral efficacy. J Med Virol. 2010;82:1560–8. doi:10.1002/jmv.21839.
Arbuckle JH, Medveczky MM, Luka J, et al. The latent human herpesvirus-6A genome specifically integrates in telomeres of human chromosomes in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:5563–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913586107.
Hirsch HH, Lautenschlager I, Pinsky BA, et al. An international multicenter performance analysis of cytomegalovirus load tests. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;56:367–73. doi:10.1093/cid/cis900.
Hayden RT, Gu Z, Ingersoll J, et al. Comparison of droplet digital PCR to real-time PCR for quantitative detection of cytomegalovirus. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:540–6.
Strain MC, Lada SM, Luong T, et al. Highly precise measurement of HIV DNA by droplet digital PCR. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:2–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055943.
Hoshino T, Inagaki F. Molecular quantification of environmental DNA using microfluidics and digital PCR. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2012;35:390–5. doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2012.06.006.
Dingle TC, Sedlak RH, Linda C, Jerome KR. Tolerance of droplet-digital PCR vs real-time quantitative PCR to inhibitory substances. Clin Chem. 2013;59:1668–9.
Heyries KA, Tropini C, Vaninsberghe M, et al. Megapixel digital PCR. Nat Methods. 2011;8:649–51. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1640.
Conrad DF, Pinto D, Redon R, et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature. 2010;464:704–12. doi:10.1038/nature08516.
Berger MF, Lawrence MS, Demichelis F, et al. The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer. Nature. 2011;470:214–20. doi:10.1038/nature09744.
Whale AS, Huggett JF, Cowen S, et al. Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40, e82. doi:10.1093/nar/gks203.
Petriv OI, Heyries KA, VanInsberghe M, et al. Methods for multiplex template sampling in digital PCR assays. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:1–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098341.
Page K, Hava N, Ward B, et al. Detection of HER2 amplification in circulating free DNA in patients with breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1342–8. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.89.
Gevensleben H, Garcia-Murillas I, Graeser MK, et al. Noninvasive detection of HER2 amplification with plasma DNA digital PCR. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:3276–84.
Miotke L, Lau BT, Rumma RT, Ji HP. High sensitivity detection and quantitation of DNA copy number and single nucleotide variants with single color droplet digital PCR. Anal Chem. 2014;86:2618–24. doi:10.1021/ac403843j.
Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:10513–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0804549105.
Mouillet J-F, Chu T, Hubel CA, et al. The levels of hypoxia-regulated microRNAs in plasma of pregnant women with fetal growth restriction. Placenta. 2010;31:781–4. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2010.07.001.
Wu L, Zhou H, Lin H, et al. Circulating microRNAs are elevated in plasma from severe preeclamptic pregnancies. Reproduction. 2012;143:389–97. doi:10.1530/REP-11-0304.
Chim SSC, Shing TKF, Hung ECW, et al. Detection and characterization of placental MicroRNAs in maternal plasma. Clin Chem. 2008;54:482–90. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2007.097972.
Ma J, Li N, Guarnera M, Jiang F. Quantification of plasma miRNAs by digital PCR for cancer diagnosis. Biomark Insights. 2013;8:127–36. doi:10.4137/BMImi.Ss13154.
Takahashi K, Yan IK, Kim C, et al. Analysis of extracellular RNA by digital PCR. Front Oncol. 2014;4:2–7.
Huggett JF, Foy CA, Benes V, et al. The digital MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative digital PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2013;59:892–902. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2013.206375.
Li M, Chen W-D, Papadopoulos N, et al. Sensitive digital quantification of DNA methylation in clinical samples. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:858–63. doi:10.1038/nbt.1559.
Weisenberger DJ, Trinh BN, Campan M, et al. DNA methylation analysis by digital bisulfite genomic sequencing and digital MethyLight. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:4689–98. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn455.
White RA, Quake SR, Curr K. Digital PCR provides absolute quantitation of viral load for an occult RNA virus. J Virol Methods. 2012;179:45–50. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.09.017.
Bhattarai N, Stapleton JT. GB virus C: the good boy virus? Trends Microbiol. 2012;20:124–30. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.01.004.
Henrich TJ, Gallien S, Li JZ, et al. Low-level detection and quantitation of cellular HIV-1 DNA and 2-LTR circles using droplet digital PCR. J Virol Methods. 2012;186:68–72. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.08.019.
Kiss MM, Ortoleva-Donnelly L, Beer NR, et al. High-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction in picoliter droplets. Anal Chem. 2008;80:8975–81.
Shen F, Davydova EK, Du W, et al. Digital isothermal quantification of nucleic acids via simultaneous chemical initiation of recombinase polymerase amplification reactions on SlipChip. Anal Chem. 2011;83:3533–40. doi:10.1021/ac200247e.
Yung TKF, Chan KCA, Mok TSK, et al. Single-molecule detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in plasma by microfluidics digital PCR in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2076–84. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2622.
Wang J, Ramakrishnan R, Tang Z, et al. Quantifying EGFR alterations in the lung cancer genome with nanofluidic digital PCR arrays. Clin Chem. 2010;56:623–32. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2009.134973.
Wang L, McLeod HL, Weinshilboum RM. Genomics and drug response. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1144–53. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1010600.Genomics.
Ouahchi K, Lindeman N, Lee C. Copy number variants and pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics. 2006;7:25–9. doi:10.2217/14622416.7.1.25.
Reiter M, Kirchner B, Müller H, et al. Quantification noise in single cell experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:1–12. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr505.
Rottiers V, Näär AM. MicroRNAs in metabolism and metabolic disorders. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:239–50. doi:10.1038/nrm3313.
Nair VS, Maeda LS, Ioannidis JPA. Clinical outcome prediction by MicroRNAs in human cancer: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:528–40. doi:10.1093/jnci/djs027.
Petriv OI, Kuchenbauer F, Delaney AD, et al. Comprehensive microRNA expression profiling of the hematopoietic hierarchy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15443–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1009320107.
Baylin SB, Jones PA. A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome – biological and translational implications. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:726–34. doi:10.1038/nrc3130.
Mikeska T, Candiloro IL, Dobrovic A. The implications of heterogeneous DNA methylation for the accurate quantification of methylation. Epigenomics. 2010;2:561–73. doi:10.2217/epi.10.32.
Cipriany BR, Zhao R, Murphy PJ, et al. Single molecule epigenetic analysis in a nanofluidic channel. Anal Chem. 2010;82:2480–7.
Weaver S, Dube S, Mir A, et al. Taking qPCR to a higher level: analysis of CNV reveals the power of high throughput qPCR to enhance quantitative resolution. Methods. 2010;50:271–6. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.01.003.
Corbisier P, Bhat S, Partis L, et al. Absolute quantification of genetically modified MON810 maize (Zea mays L.) by digital polymerase chain reaction. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;396:2143–50. doi:10.1007/s00216-009-3200-3.
Morisset D, Štebih D, Milavec M, et al. Quantitative analysis of food and feed samples with droplet digital PCR. PLoS ONE. 2013;8, e62583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062583.
Baker M. Digital PCR hits its stride. Nat Methods. 2012;9:541–4. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2027.
McDermott GP, Do D, Litterst CM, et al. Multiplexed target detection using DNA-binding dye chemistry in droplet digital PCR. Anal Chem. 2013;85:11619–27. doi:10.1021/ac403061n.
Waiblinger H-U, Ernst B, Anderson A, Pietsch K. Validation and collaborative study of a P35S and T-nos duplex real-time PCR screening method to detect genetically modified organisms in food products. Eur Food Res Technol. 2008;226:1221–8. doi:10.1007/s00217-007-0748-z.
Kluga L, Folloni S, van den Bulcke M, et al. Applicability of the “Real-Time PCR-Based Ready-to-Use Multi-Target Analytical System for GMO Detection” in processed maize matrices. Eur Food Res Technol. 2012;234:109–18. doi:10.1007/s00217-011-1615-5.
Shao N, Jiang SM, Zhang M, et al. MACRO: a combined microchip-PCR and microarray system for high-throughput monitoring of genetically modified organisms. Anal Chem. 2014;86:1269–76. doi:10.1021/ac403630a.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX08012-001). Many thanks to Pengyu Zhu for his kindly help in manuscript conception and preparation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Xu, W. (2016). A Developed Accurate Digital PCR Detection Technology in Food Safety. In: Functional Nucleic Acids Detection in Food Safety. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1618-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1618-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1617-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1618-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)