Abstract
The purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between the various user patterns among young people and their use of computers and the Internet in school. First, by using cluster analysis on survey data (N=1,850 /age: 9-16 years), we identified four distinct user types: Sporadic Users (38%), Video Users (11%), Socialisers (41%), and Advanced Users (10%). This finding indicates that social media natives, understood as young people, grown up with social media, are not a homogeneous group of media users. Second, a concerning finding is that so many of the user types lean toward a passive user style focused on entertainment. In comparison to previous studies, there is a marked turn toward deriving more entertainment value from computer and Internet use – where technology is used as a toy more than a tool. A typical pattern towards instrumental or utility use is not identified in this study. Third, this study finds a relationship between how young people use new media in general and how often they use computers and the Internet at school. This latter finding suggests that schools may exert a strong influence on how young people in the 21st century develop their user style and competence level in new technologies. At present, schools might amplify rather than equalise the digital divide between young people. Finally, the user typology identified might help researchers, practitioners, and decision makers to better understand the complex variations among social media natives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barn og Medier. (2014). 2014 – Barn og Medier. En rapport fra Medietilsynet om barn og unges bruk og opplevelser av medier. (A report on children and their use of media). Medietilsynet, Fredriktstad. Retrieved from http://www.medietilsynet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/2015/rapport_barnogmedier_2014.pdf
Borgen, F. H., & Barnett, D. C. (1987). Applying cluster analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(4), 456–468.
Borgers, N., De Leeuw, E., & Hox, J. (2000). Children as respondents in survey research: Cognitive development and response quality. Bulletin de methodologie Sociologique, 66(1), 60–75.
Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2010). Towards a unified media-user typology (MUT): A meta-analysis and review of the research literature on media-user typologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 940–956.
Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications – A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(4), 467–488.
Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2014). Digitale skiller blant barn og unge i 2014: Hvor “flinke” er de digitalt innfødte i verdens mest digitale land? – Rapport til Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet. Medietilsynet. Fredrikstad.
Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Heim, J. (2011). A typology of social networking sites users. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 7(1), 28–51.
Brandtzaeg, P. B., Heim, J., & Karahasanovic, A. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide – A jtypology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 69(3), 123–138.
Brandtzaeg, P. B., Haugestveit, I. M., Lüders, M., & Følstad, A. (2015, online first). How should organizations adapt to youth civic engagement in social media? A lead user approach. Interacting with Computers. doi: 10.1093/iwc/iwv041
Buckingham, D., & Willett, R. (2013). Digital generations: Children, young people, and the new media. New York, NY: Routledge.
Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2002). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Endestad, T., Heim, J. Kaare, B., Torgersen, L., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2011). Media user types among young children and social displacement. Nordicom Review, 32(1), 17–30. Retrieved from http://www.nordicom.gu.se/sites/default/files/kapitelpdf/337_endestad %20et%20al.pdf
Erstad, O., Gilje, Ø., & Arnseth, H. C. (2013). Learning lives connected: Digital youth across school and community spaces. Comunicar, 20(40), 89–98. Retrieved from http://www.revistacomunicar.com/index.php?contenido=detalles&numero=40&articulo=40-2013-11
Ferrari, A. (2003). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Scientific and policy report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Retrieved from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC83167.pdf
Global Web Index. (2015). Mobile use chart. Retrieved from http://www.globalwebindex.net/blog
Hargittai, E. (2002). Beyond logs and surveys: In-depth measures of people’s Web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14), 1239–1244.
Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication and Society, 11(2), 239–256.
Hatlevik, O. E., Egeberg, G., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2013). Monitor skole. Om digital kompetanse og erfaringer med bruk av IKT i skolen. Oslo: IKT-senteret (Use of ICT in Norwegian school). Retrieved from https://iktsenteret.no/sites/iktsenteret.no/files/attachments/monitor_skole_2013_4des.pdf
Heim, J., Brandtzæg, P. B., Endestad, T., Kaare, B. H., & Torgersen, L. (2007). Children’s usage of media technologies and psychosocial factors. New Media & Society, 9(3), 425–454.
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2014). Digital competence – An emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 1–25.
Internet World Stats. (2015). The internet big picture: World internet users and 2015 population stats. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
Jenkins, H. (1997). Empowering children in the digital age: Towards a radical media pedagogy. Radical Teacher, 50, 30.
Johnsson-Smaragdi, U. (2001). Media use styles among the young. In S. Livingstone & M. Bovill (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study (pp. 131–41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Johri, A., Teo, H. J., Lo, J., Dufour, M., & Schram, A. (2014). Millennial engineers: Digital media and information ecology of engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 33(5), 286–301.
Koutropoulos, A. (2011). Digital natives: Ten years after. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 525–538.
Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). From digital divides to digital inequality. US-China Education Review, 5(9), 1–16.
Lüders, M. (2008). Conceptualizing personal media. New Media and Society, 10(5), 683–702.
Lüders, M., & Brandtzaeg, P. (2014, online first). “My children tell me it’s so simple”: A mixed- methods approach to understand older non-users’ perceptions of social networking sites. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444814554064
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.
NCCA. (2004). Curriculum assessment and ICT in the Irish context: A discussion paper. Retrieved from http://www.ncca.ie/uploadedfiles/ECPE/Curriculum%20AssessmentandICT.pdf
Norris, P. (2003). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Obrist, M., Cesar, P., Geerts, D., Bartindale, T., & Churchill, E. F. (2015, August). Online video and interactive TV experiences. Interactions, 22(5), 32–37. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2799629
OECD. (2011). The OECD programme for international assessment of adult competencies (PIAAC). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/site/piaac/Chapter%2000%20PIAAC %20Tech%20Report.pdf
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the natives. Educational leadership, 63(4), 8–13.
Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t bother me, Mom, I’m learning! How computer and video games are preparing your kids for 21st century success and how you can help! New York, NY: Paragon House.
Roodt, S., & Peier, D. (2013, July). Using YouTube© in the classroom for the net generation of students. In Proceedings of the Informing Science and Information Technology Education Conference (Vol. 2013, No. 1, pp. 473–488).
Tan, P., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, J. (2006). Introduction to data mining. New York, NY: Pearson, Addison Wesley.
Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning. Lifewide Magazine, 11. Retrieved September 10, 2014, from http://www.lifewidemagazine.co.uk/uploads/1/0/8/4/10842717/lifewide_magazine_11.pdf#page=10
van Dijk, J. (2006). The network society (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Westlund, O., & Bjur, J. (2014). Media life of the young. Young, 22(1), 21–41.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brandtzæg, P.B. (2016). The Social Media Natives. In: Elstad, E. (eds) Digital Expectations and Experiences in Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-648-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-648-4_9
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-648-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)