Abstract
The question of learning and of its determining factors is widely tackled in the literature in the field, many researchers attempting to comprehend the act of human learning in general and school learning in particular. Thus, learning is analysed from the perspectives of neurologists, psychologists, educationalists and sociologists, each with an interest in the aspects that determine the process of learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amrai, K., Motlagh, S. E., Zalani, H. A., & Parhon, H. (2011). The relationship between academic motivation and academic achievement students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 399–402. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.111
Anders, C., & Berg, R. (2005). Factors related to observed attitude change toward learning chemistry among university students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(1), 1–18.
Anghelache, V. (2013). Determinant factors of students’ attitudes toward learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 478–482. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.223
Anghelache, V. (2014). The non-cognitive variables of the students’ attitude towards learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 44–48. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.115
Anghelache, V. (2015). Perspectives in the analysis of students’ mentality towards learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 497–502. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.093
Ausubel, D. P., & Robinson, F. G. (1981). Învăţarea în şcoală. O introducere în psihologia pedagogică. Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
Bishop-Clark, C., Dietz-Uhler, B., & Fisher, A. (2007). The effects of personality type on web-based distance learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(4), 491–506.
Cerghit, I. (2008). Sisteme de instruire alternative şi complementare. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
Chou, P. N., & Chen, W. F. (2008). Exploratory study of the relationship between self-directed learning and academic performance in a web-based learning environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, X1(I). (University of West Georgia.)
Dănăilă, L., & Golu, M. (2000). Tratat de neuropsihologie (Vol. I). Bucureşti: Editura Medicală.
De Raad, B., & Schuwenburg, H. C. (1996). Personality in learning and education: A review. European Journal of Personality, 10, 303–306.
Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1907–1920. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.020
Eysenck H. J., & Eysenck M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. London: Plenum Press.
Fabunmi, M., Brai-Abu, P., & Adeniji, I. A. (2007). Class factors as determinants of secondary school student’s academic performance in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Social Science, 14(3), 243–247.
Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved from https://ccsr.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Noncognitive%20Report.pdf
Francis, A., Goheer, A., & Kaplan, A. D. (2004). Promoting academic achievement and motivation: A discussion & contemporary issues based approach, Gemstone program. University of Maryland, College Park, MA.
Furnham, A. (1992). Personality at work. The role of individual differences in the workplace. London: Routledge.
Garkaz, M., Banimahd, B., & Esmaeilic, H. (2011). Factors affecting accounting students’ performance: The case of Students at the Islamic Azad University. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 122–128. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.216
Kasworm, C. E. (1990). Adult undergraduates in higher education: A review of past research perspectives. Review of Educational Research, 60, 345–372. doi:10.3102/00346543060003345
Lavasani, M. G., Mirhosseini, F. S., Hejazi, E., & Davoodi, M. (2011). The effect of self-regulation learning strategies training on the academic motivation and self-efficacy. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 627–632. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.285
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313–327.
Missoum, G. (2003). Am reuşit. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
Neacşu, I. (1999). Instruire şi învăţare. Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică.
Negreţ-Dobridor, I., & Pânişoară, I. O. (2005). Ştiinţa învăţării. De la teorie la practică. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
Neveanu, P. P. (1978). Dicţionar de psihologie. Bucureşti: Editura Albatros.
Norwich, B., & Duncan, J. (1990). Attitudes, subjective norm, perceived preventive factors, intentions and learning science: Testing a modified theory of reasoned action. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 312–321. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1990.tb00947.x
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
Riaz, A., & Hussain, M. (2011). Students’ acceptance and commitment to e-learning: Evidence from Pakistan. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Change, International Association for Teaching and Learning, 123–133.
Richardson, J. T. (1995). Mature students in higher education: An investigation of approaches to studying and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 20, 5–17.
Roy, B., Sinha, R., & Suman, S. (2013). Emotional intelligence and academic achievement motivation among adolescents. A relationship study. International Refereed Research Journal, 4(2), 126–130.
Sadeghi, N., Kasim, Z. M., Tan, B. H., & Abdullah, F. Z. (2012). Learning styles, personality types and reading comprehension performance. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 116–123.
Shah, Z. A., & Mahmood, N. (2011). Developing a scale to measure attitude towards science learning among school students. Bulletin of Education and Research, 33(1), 71–81.
Tsuda, S. (2003). Attitudes toward English language learning in higher education in Japan (2): Raising awareness of the notion of global English. Intercultural Communication Studies XII-3. Retrieved from http://www.uri.edu/iaics/content/2003v12n3/06%20Sanae%20Tsuda.pdf
Tuckman, B. W. (1999). A tripartite model of motivation for achievement: Attitude/drive/strategy. Boston, MA: American Psychological Association.
Willms, J. D. (2003). Student engagement at school. A sense of belonging and participation. Results from Pisa 2000. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33689437.pdf
Zlate, M. (2004). Tratat de psihologie organizaţional-managerială. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anghelache, V. (2016). Relation Between Non-Cognitive Factors of Learning and the Students’ Academic Performance. In: Khine, M.S., Areepattamannil, S. (eds) Non-cognitive Skills and Factors in Educational Attainment. Contemporary Approaches to Research in learning Innovations. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-591-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-591-3_7
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-591-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)