Skip to main content

“They Can’t Just Google the Correct Answer”

Personalising Science Learning in an Open-Plan Secondary School

  • Chapter
Personalising Learning in Open-Plan Schools

Abstract

Thanks Dr Dave. I’m glad you like the idea for my Spider-Bat and I will definitely try and fix those ears and I agree that my critter does seem a little defenceless. I will make sure to think about some ways in which my Spider-Bat can avoid being lunch!! Thanks again.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aikenhead, G. (1996). Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52 [Published online 2008]. doi:10.1080/03057269608560077

  • Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. doi:10.1126/science.1204153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1167267

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. (1981). Performance before competence: Assistance to child discourse in the zone of proximal development. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3(1), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, I. (2014). Australia needs a strategy. Science, 345(6200), 985. doi:10.1126/science.1259741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Young children’s aspirations in science: The unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 1037–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (2007). STCSE – Bibliography: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel, Germany: IPN-Leibniz Institute for Science Education. Retrieved from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science – From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, part 1(pp. 3–25). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. doi:10.3102/0091732X07309371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, B., Marginson, S., & Tytler, R. (Eds.). (2015). The age of STEM: Policy and practice in science, technology, engineering and mathematics across the world. Oxon, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haste, H. (2004). Science in my future: A study of the values and beliefs in relation to science and technology amongst 11–21 year olds. London, UK: Nestlé Social Research Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 46–53. doi:10.3102/0013189X15569530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–387). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2015). Demonstrating the value of informal learning. Retrieved from http://www.jaylemke.com/

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. Davis, E., & Bell, P. (2013). Internet environments for science education. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2010). The significance of educational dialogues between primary school children. In K. Littleton & C. Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 271–288). Milton Park, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Secondary biology teachers’ use of different types of diagrams for different purposes. In B. Eilam & J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Science teachers’ use of visual representations (pp. 103–121). Switzerland, Europe: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06526-7_5

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–613. doi:10.1080/09500690500339621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London, UK: Nuffield Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. doi:10.1002/tea.20009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction—two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum (pp. 231–247). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Future is Wild. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.thefutureiswild.com

  • The Global School. (2015). Retrieved from http://theglobalschool.net/science/

  • Tytler, R. (2007). Reimagining science education: Engaging students in Australia’s future. ACER. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/aer/3

  • Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (Eds.). (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1981/1986). In A. Kozulin (Ed.), Thought and language (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrip, B., & Prain, V. (2006). Changing representations to learn primary science concepts. Teaching Science, 52(4), 17–21. Retrieved from http://www.asta.edu.au/resources/teachingscience

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2010). Using multi-modal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 65–80. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9157-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prain, V., Waldrip, B., Lovejoy, V. (2015). “They Can’t Just Google the Correct Answer”. In: Prain, V., et al. Personalising Learning in Open-Plan Schools. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-193-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics