Abstract
The Hawthorne studies by Roethlisberger and Dickson (1939) that investigated workplace behavior have maintained a consistent presence in social science and education research literature (Chiesa & Hobbs, 2008). The Hawthorne Effect has been often noted in social experiments describing participants modifying their behavior during the investigation because they know they are being studied (G. Payne & J. Payne, 2004). This chapter explores the use of the Hawthorne Effect in the literature and incorporates the possibility of mitigating the Hawthorne Effect with an investigation of a computer simulation embedded with performance-based assessments. Participant responses about the effect of the simulation on their responses initiated this exploration in the Hawthorne Effect. Findings and implications delve into the applicable uses of computer simulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrahamson, S., Denson, J. S., & Wolf, R. M. (2004). Effectiveness of a simulator in training anes- thesiology residents. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(5), 395-397. doi:10.1136/qhc.13.5.395
Adair, J. G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 334.
Annetta, L., & Holmes, S. (2006). Creating presence and community in a synchronous virtual learning environment using avatars. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning.
Annetta, L., Minogue, J., Holmes, S., Cheng, M., Folta, E., & Klesath, M. (2009). Digital simulations for improving education: Learning through artificial teaching environments. In Using case studies as the narrative to game design and development. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Baek, Y. (2009). Digital simulation in teaching and learning. In Digital simulations for improving education: Learning through artificial teaching environments. Information Science Reference.
Bos, N. D., Shami, N. S., & Naab, S. (2006). A globalization simulation to teach corporate social responsibility: Design features and analysis of student reasoning. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 56-72.
Chiesa, M., & Hobbs, S. (2008). Making sense of social research: How useful is the Hawthorne effect? European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(1), 67-74.
Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles. Educause. Retrieved from www.educause. edu/apps/eq/eqm05/eqmo511
Dugdale, J., Pallamin, N., & Pavard, B. (2006). An assessment of a mixed reality environment: Toward an ethnomethodological approach. Simulation & Gaming, 37(2), 226-244.
French, J. R. (1953). Experiments in field settings. In Research methods in the behavioral sciences (pp. 98-135). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Frenz, C. (2007). Possilbilities and limitations of computer simulation. IEEE Potentials (March/April), 30-33.
Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning. New York: Palgrave.
Harris, C. M. (2002). Is multimedia-based instruction hawthorne revisited? Is difference the difference? Education, 122(4), 839-843.
Hmelo, C. E., Ramakrishnan, S., Day, R. S., Shirey, W. E., Brufsky, A., Johnson, C., Baar, J., et al. (2001). Oncology thinking cap: Scaffolded use of a simulation to learn clinical trial design. Teaching & Learning in Medicine, 13(3), 183-191.
Holden, J. (2000). Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice. Journal of Evaluation on Clinical Practice, 7(1), 65-70.
Jones, S. R. G. (1992). Was there a hawthorne effect? American Journal of Sociology, 98(3), 451-468. Lee, H., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2006). Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer- based science simulations. Journal of educational psychology, 98(4), 902-913.
Macedonia, M. (2002). Games soldiers play. IEEE Spectrum, 39(3), 32-37.
Magee, M. (2006). State of field review: Simulation in education. Retrieved from www.ccl- cca.ca/NR/.../SFRSimulationinEducationJul06REV.pdf
Payne, G., & Payne, J. (2004). Key concepts in social research. London: Sage Publications. Retrieved from http://search.trln.org/search?id=UNCb4466094
Peacock, B. (2005). Laws and rules: Remember Hawthorne. Ergonomics in Design, 13(1), 6.
Reigeluth, C., & Schwartz, E. (1989). An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16(1), 1-10.
Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Seabury, B. (2003). On-line, computer-based, interactive simulations: Bridging classroom and field. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 22(1), 29-48.
Shaffer, D. (2007). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education, 46(3), 223.
Soderberg, P., & Price, F. (2003). An examination of problem-based teaching and learning in population genetics and evolution using EVOLVE, a computer simulation. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 35-55.
Tannenbaum, S., & Yukl, G. (1992). Training and development in work organizations. In Annual review psychology (pp. 399-441). New York: Annual Reviews Inc.
Tung, F., & Deng, Y. (2006). Designing social presence in e-learning environments: Testing the effect of interactivity on children. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(3), 251-264.
Waldmann, U., Gulich, M. S., & Zeitler, H. (2008). Virtual patients for assessing medical students-important aspects when considering the introduction of a new assessment format. Medical teacher, 30(1), 17-24.
Winn, W. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 331-351.
Yeh, Y. C. (2004). Nurturing reflective teaching during critical-thinking instruction in a computer simulation program. Computers & Education, 42(2), 181.
Shawn Y. Holmes. North Carolina State University
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holmes, S.Y. (2011). Mitigating the Hawthorne Effect Using Computer Simulations. In: Annetta, L., Bronack, S.C. (eds) Serious Educational Game Assessment. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-329-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-329-7_11
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-329-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)
