Skip to main content

Action-Control Beliefs and Agentic Actions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course

Abstract

Throughout their lifespan, agentic individuals consistently update their understandings of situational and environmental contexts and frequently deconstruct and reconstruct their actions as well as the consequences of their actions that arose within these contexts. Highly agentic persons display high aspirations, are motivated to engage the environment, and persist through difficulty. Individuals who are not agentic have lower aspirations, believe that actions have little effect on their outcomes, and are lacking in basic problem-solving skills. These non-agentic individuals typically accept failures and do not reflect on the actions which led to the failure. This chapter overviews action-control beliefs and Action-Control Theory. Action-control beliefs involve three general beliefs that reflect the relationship between the three components of an action sequence: control expectancy, which refers to the relation between agent and ends, meaning that individual’s expectancy about their capability to achieve a given goal or end; means-ends beliefs, which represent the relation between means and ends; and agency beliefs, refer to an individual’s beliefs of what means they are capable of utilizing when the self acts as an agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (1980). Judgments of contingency: Errors and their implications. In A. Baum & J. Singer (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 111–130). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, E. E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brandtstädter, J. (1998). Action perspectives on human development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Theoretical models of human development: Vol. 1. Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 807–863). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., & Fleeson, W. (1994). Social intelligence and intelligent goal pursuit: A cognitive slice of motivation. In W. Spaulding (Ed.), Integrative views of motivation, cognition, and emotion (pp. 125–179). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, M., & Skinner, E. A. (1985). Action in development/development in action. In M. Frese & J. Sabini (Eds.), The development of social cognition (pp. 35–64). East Sussex: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M. (1984). International action as a paradigm for developmental psychology: A symposium. Human Development, 27(3–4), 113–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M., & Skinner, E. A. (1989). Children’s agency beliefs, cognitive performance and conceptions of effort and ability: Interaction of individual and developmental differences. Child Development, 60, 1229–1238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P. (1985). A new multidimensional measure of children’s perceptions of control. Child Development, 56, 1018–1041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington: D. C. Heath (Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and the self determination theory of behavior. Psychology Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 5–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 91–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 283–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1984). Emergent achievement behavior: Some early developments. In J. G. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 1–32). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, J., Dixon, R. A., & Baltes, P. B. (1989). Gains and losses in development throughout adulthood as perceived by different adult age groups. Developmental Psychology, 25, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A system view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, R. (1986). Autonomy. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (1998). Sociocultural influences on the development of children’s action-control beliefs. In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span (pp. 281–315). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., & Lopez, D. F. (1997). Regularities in the development of children’s causality beliefs about school performance across six sociocultural contexts. Developmental Psychology, 33, 165–175. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., & Wanner, B. (1997). The Multi-CAM: A multidimensional instrument to assess children’s action-control motives, beliefs, and behaviors (Materialen aus der Bildungsforschung, Nr. 59, ISBN #3–87985-064-x). Berlin, Germany: Max-Planck Institute for Human Development and Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Hawley, P. H., Henrich, C. C., & Marsland, K. W. (2002). Three views of the agentic self: A developmental synthesis. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 389–404). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Snyder, C. R., & Wehmeyer, M. (2006). The agentic self: On the nature and origins of personal agency across the life span. In D. K. Mroczek & T. D. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 61–79). Mahwah: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, L.-E., Wanner, B., Nordmyr, A-M., & Little, T. D. (2004). The teachers’ control, agency, and means-ends (TCAM) questionnaire: Reliability and validity (Monograph (No. 7) of the Faculty of Education, Abo Akademi University). Vasa: Multiprint Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, J.-E. (2001). Adolescents’ self-direction and self-definition in age-graded sociocultural and interpersonal contexts. In J.-E. Nurmi (Ed.), Navigating through adolescence (pp. 229–250). New York: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oettingen, G., Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Causality, agency, and control beliefs in East versus West Berlin children: A natural experiment on the role of context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 579–595. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reckless, R. E. (1979). Ecology. Portland: Chiron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy, and the self in psychological development. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Developmental perspectives on motivation, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 40). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A. (1995). Perceived control, motivation, and coping. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., Chapman, M., & Baltes, P. B. (1988). Children’s beliefs about control, means-ends and agency: Developmental differences during middle childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 11, 368–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: The role of perceived control in children’s engagement and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetsenko, A., Little, T. D., Oettingen, G., & Baltes, P. B. (1995). Agency, control, and means€nds beliefs about school performance in Moscow children: How similar are they to beliefs of Western children? Developmental Psychology, 31, 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetsenko, A., Little, T. D., Gordeeva, T., Grasshof, M., & Oettingen, G. (2000). Gender effects in children’s beliefs about school performance: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 71, 517–527. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D. (1984). Young children’s performance expectations: Logical analysis or wishful thinking? In J. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 33–56). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Porac, J. F., Lathin, D., Smith, R., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rong Chang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chang, R., Adams, N., Little, T.D. (2017). Action-Control Beliefs and Agentic Actions. In: Wehmeyer, M., Shogren, K., Little, T., Lopez, S. (eds) Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics