Abstract
Throughout their lifespan, agentic individuals consistently update their understandings of situational and environmental contexts and frequently deconstruct and reconstruct their actions as well as the consequences of their actions that arose within these contexts. Highly agentic persons display high aspirations, are motivated to engage the environment, and persist through difficulty. Individuals who are not agentic have lower aspirations, believe that actions have little effect on their outcomes, and are lacking in basic problem-solving skills. These non-agentic individuals typically accept failures and do not reflect on the actions which led to the failure. This chapter overviews action-control beliefs and Action-Control Theory. Action-control beliefs involve three general beliefs that reflect the relationship between the three components of an action sequence: control expectancy, which refers to the relation between agent and ends, meaning that individual’s expectancy about their capability to achieve a given goal or end; means-ends beliefs, which represent the relation between means and ends; and agency beliefs, refer to an individual’s beliefs of what means they are capable of utilizing when the self acts as an agent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (1980). Judgments of contingency: Errors and their implications. In A. Baum & J. Singer (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 111–130). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Boesch, E. E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. New York: Springer.
Brandtstädter, J. (1998). Action perspectives on human development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Theoretical models of human development: Vol. 1. Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 807–863). New York: Wiley.
Cantor, N., & Fleeson, W. (1994). Social intelligence and intelligent goal pursuit: A cognitive slice of motivation. In W. Spaulding (Ed.), Integrative views of motivation, cognition, and emotion (pp. 125–179). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Champion, M., & Skinner, E. A. (1985). Action in development/development in action. In M. Frese & J. Sabini (Eds.), The development of social cognition (pp. 35–64). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Chapman, M. (1984). International action as a paradigm for developmental psychology: A symposium. Human Development, 27(3–4), 113–144.
Chapman, M., & Skinner, E. A. (1989). Children’s agency beliefs, cognitive performance and conceptions of effort and ability: Interaction of individual and developmental differences. Child Development, 60, 1229–1238.
Connell, J. P. (1985). A new multidimensional measure of children’s perceptions of control. Child Development, 56, 1018–1041.
Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species. London: John Murray.
Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington: D. C. Heath (Lexington Books).
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and the self determination theory of behavior. Psychology Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 5–39.
Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618.
Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 91–132.
Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 283–329.
Heckhausen, H. (1984). Emergent achievement behavior: Some early developments. In J. G. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 1–32). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Heckhausen, J., Dixon, R. A., & Baltes, P. B. (1989). Gains and losses in development throughout adulthood as perceived by different adult age groups. Developmental Psychology, 25, 109–121.
Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A system view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23–52.
Lindley, R. (1986). Autonomy. London: Macmillan.
Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76.
Little, T. D. (1998). Sociocultural influences on the development of children’s action-control beliefs. In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span (pp. 281–315). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Little, T. D., & Lopez, D. F. (1997). Regularities in the development of children’s causality beliefs about school performance across six sociocultural contexts. Developmental Psychology, 33, 165–175. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.165.
Little, T. D., & Wanner, B. (1997). The Multi-CAM: A multidimensional instrument to assess children’s action-control motives, beliefs, and behaviors (Materialen aus der Bildungsforschung, Nr. 59, ISBN #3–87985-064-x). Berlin, Germany: Max-Planck Institute for Human Development and Education.
Little, T. D., Hawley, P. H., Henrich, C. C., & Marsland, K. W. (2002). Three views of the agentic self: A developmental synthesis. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 389–404). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
Little, T. D., Snyder, C. R., & Wehmeyer, M. (2006). The agentic self: On the nature and origins of personal agency across the life span. In D. K. Mroczek & T. D. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 61–79). Mahwah: LEA.
Malmberg, L.-E., Wanner, B., Nordmyr, A-M., & Little, T. D. (2004). The teachers’ control, agency, and means-ends (TCAM) questionnaire: Reliability and validity (Monograph (No. 7) of the Faculty of Education, Abo Akademi University). Vasa: Multiprint Press.
Nurmi, J.-E. (2001). Adolescents’ self-direction and self-definition in age-graded sociocultural and interpersonal contexts. In J.-E. Nurmi (Ed.), Navigating through adolescence (pp. 229–250). New York: Rutledge.
Oettingen, G., Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Causality, agency, and control beliefs in East versus West Berlin children: A natural experiment on the role of context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 579–595. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.579.
Reckless, R. E. (1979). Ecology. Portland: Chiron Press.
Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy, and the self in psychological development. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Developmental perspectives on motivation, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 40). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Skinner, E. A. (1995). Perceived control, motivation, and coping. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Skinner, E. A., Chapman, M., & Baltes, P. B. (1988). Children’s beliefs about control, means-ends and agency: Developmental differences during middle childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 11, 368–388.
Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: The role of perceived control in children’s engagement and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22–32.
Stetsenko, A., Little, T. D., Oettingen, G., & Baltes, P. B. (1995). Agency, control, and means€nds beliefs about school performance in Moscow children: How similar are they to beliefs of Western children? Developmental Psychology, 31, 285–299.
Stetsenko, A., Little, T. D., Gordeeva, T., Grasshof, M., & Oettingen, G. (2000). Gender effects in children’s beliefs about school performance: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 71, 517–527. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00161.
Stipek, D. (1984). Young children’s performance expectations: Logical analysis or wishful thinking? In J. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 33–56). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.
Zuckerman, M., Porac, J. F., Lathin, D., Smith, R., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 443–446.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chang, R., Adams, N., Little, T.D. (2017). Action-Control Beliefs and Agentic Actions. In: Wehmeyer, M., Shogren, K., Little, T., Lopez, S. (eds) Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1040-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1042-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)