Abstract
Performing an action with the assistance of a BCI may affect a user’s judgment of agency, resulting in an illusion of control, or automatism. We analyze this possibility from a theoretical perspective and discuss various factors that might influence a user’s judgment of agency in a BCI context. We present two pilot experiments that illustrate how this theoretical possibility can be investigated experimentally. We examine potential psychological, ethical, and legal implications of mistaken judgments, and potential benefits of the constructive manipulation of a user’s judgment of agency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beggan, J.K. 1992. On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(2): 229–237.
Beursken, E. 2012. Transparency in BCI: The effect of the mapping between an imagined movement and the resulting action on a user’s sense of agency. Bachelor thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence. Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. http://www.ru.nl/artificialintelligence/bachelor/voltooide-bachelor/
Blakemore, S.-J., D.M. Wolpert, and C. Frith. 2002. Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 237–242.
Blakemore, S.-J., D.A. Oakley, and C.D. Frith. 2003. Delusions of alien control in the normal brain. Neuropsychologia 41(8): 1058–1067.
de Vignemond, F., and P. Fourneret. 2004. The sense of agency: A philosophical and empirical review of the ‘who’ system. Consciousness and Cognition 13: 1–19.
Frith, C.D. 1987. The positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia reflect impairments in the perception and initiation of action. Psychological Medicine 17(3): 631–648.
Frith, C. 2012. Explaining delusions of control: The comparator model 20 years on. Consciousness and Cognition 21: 52–54. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.06.010.
Gallagher, S. 2000. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1): 14–21.
Gallagher, S. 2012. Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology 30(1): 15–31. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.003.
Haselager, W.F.G. 2013. Did I do that? Brain-computer interfacing and the sense of agency. Minds and Machines 23(3): 405–418. doi:10.1007/s11023-012-9298-7.
Lynn, M.T., C.C. Berger, T.A. Riddle, and E. Morsella. 2010. Mind control? Creating illusory intentions through a phony brain-computer interface. Consciousness and Cognition 19: 1007–1012. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.05.007.
Moore, J., and P. Haggard. 2008. Awareness of action: Inference and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition 17: 136–144.
Nijboer, F., J. Clausen, B.Z. Allison, and P. Haselager. 2011. The asilomar survey: Stakeholders’ opinions on ethical issues related to brain-computer interfacing. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6.
Pacherie, E. 2007. The sense of control and the sense of agency. Psyche 13(1): 1–30.
Synofzik, M., G. Vosgerau, and A. Newen. 2008. Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition 17(1): 219–239. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010.
Tamburrini, G. 2009. Brain to computer communication: Ethical perspectives on interaction models. Neuroethics 2(3): 137–149. doi:10.1007/s12152-009-9040-1.
Thoman, D.B., J.L. Smith, and P.J. Silvia. 2011. The resource replenishment function of interest. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2(6): 592–599. doi:10.1177/1948550611402521.
Tice, D.M., R.F. Baumeister, D. Shmueli, and M. Muraven. 2007. Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(3): 379–384. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.007.
Tsakiris, M., G. Prabhu, and P. Haggard. 2006. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 15: 423–432.
van Acken, J.-P. 2012. Tracking the sense of agency in BCI application. Bachelor thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence. Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. http://www.ru.nl/artificialintelligence/bachelor/voltooide-bachelor/
van Gerven, M., J. Farquhar, R. Schaefer, R. Vlek, J. Geuze, A. Nijholt, N. Ramsey, et al. 2009. The brain-computer interface cycle. Journal of Neural Engineering 6(4): 041001. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/6/4/041001.
Wegner, D.M. 2003a. The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wegner, D.M., and T. Wheatley. 1999. Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist 54: 480–492. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.480.
Wegner, D.M., V.A. Fuller, and B. Sparrow. 2003. Clever hands: Uncontrolled intelligence in facilitated communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 5–19. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.5.
Wegner, D.M., B. Sparrow, and L. Winerman. 2004. Vicarious agency: Experiencing control over the movements of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86: 838–848. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.838.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vlek, R., van Acken, JP., Beursken, E., Roijendijk, L., Haselager, P. (2014). BCI and a User’s Judgment of Agency. In: Grübler, G., Hildt, E. (eds) Brain-Computer-Interfaces in their ethical, social and cultural contexts. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8996-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8996-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8995-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8996-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)