Abstract
I should like to begin with two observations, which will form the basis for this paper.
This paper was written while I was on sabbatical leave from Victoria University of Wellington at the Free University of Amsterdam, with support from the NWO (The Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research). I should like to thank all those institutions for their support, and Geert Booij for his discussion of this topic with me. A version of this paper was presented at a workshop organised by the Sonderforschungsbereich ‘Theorie des Lexikons’ at Wuppertal in September 1995. Many additions have been made in response to reception by that audience and discussion with individual attendees at the conference, whom I should also like to thank for their input. Remaining errors and infelicities are my own.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, Stephen 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Aronoff, Mark 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark 1983. “Potential Words, Actual Words, Productivity and Frequency”. Proc. XIII Inf Cong. Ling., 163–171.
Aronoff, Mark 1994. Morphology by Itself Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bauer, Laurie 1983. English Word formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, Thomas 1993. “Morphologische Ersetzungsbildungen im Deutschen”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 12, 185–217
Booij, Geert 1995. “Allomorfie en paradigmatiek”. Leuvense Bijdragen.
Booij, Geert 1996. “Autonomous Morphology and Paradigmatic Relations”. This volume. Bybee, Joan 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Carstairs, Andrew 1987. Allomorphy in Inflexion. London: Croom Helm.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew 1992. Current Morphology. London and New York: Routledge.
Chapman, Carol 1995. “Perceptual Salience and Analogical Change: Evidence from Vowel Lengthening in Modern Swiss German Dialects”. Journal of Linguistics 31, 1–13.
Haas, Wim de and Mieke Trommelen 1993. Morfologisch Handboek van het Nederlands. 's-Gravenhage: SDU.
Lehnert, Martin 1971. Ruckläufiges Worterbuch der englischen Gegenwartssprache. Leipzig: VEB.
Lieber, Rochelle 1981. The Organization of the Lexicon. IULC.
Marie, Jaap van 1985. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Forts.
Marie, Jaap van 1994. “Paradigms”. In R.E. Asher (ed), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Oxford, etc.: Pergamon, 6, 2927–30.
Plank, Frans 1994. “Inflection and Derivation”. In R. E. Asher (ed), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Oxford, etc.: Pergamon, 3, 1671–8.
Scalise, Sergio 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Stump, Gregory T. 1993. “How Peculiar is Evaluative Morphology?” Journal of Linguistics 29, 1–36.
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1989. Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bauer, L. (1997). Derivational paradigms. In: Booij, G., van Marle, J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 1996. Yearbook of Morphology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3718-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3718-0_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4854-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3718-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive