Skip to main content

Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Education: Part I

  • Chapter

Abstract

This article is the first of two that will examine the claims of contemporary sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) and the bearing of these claims upon the rationale and practice of science teaching. It is maintained that if the claims of SSK are true then there are serious, and educationally and culturally deleterious, implications which follow. The two articles will argue that, fortunately, the claims of SSK for the external causation of scientific belief are baseless. And thus science teachers should resist admonitions to accept the findings of the sociology of science.

‘I look forward to the day when the last proponent of the ‘strong program’ in the sociology of science is strangled in the entrails of the last expert in the theory of metaphor’ Alasdair Maclntyre, 1988

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashmore, M.: 1993, ‘The Theatre of the Blind: Starring a Promethean Prankster, a Phoney Phenomenon, a Prism, a Pocket and a Piece of Wood’, Social Studies of Science 23, 67–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B.: 1981, ‘On the Hows and Whys of Cultural Change’, Social Studies of Science 11, 481–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D.: 1976, Knowledge and Social Imagery, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D.: 1981, ‘The Strengths of the Strong Programme’, Philosophy of Social Sciences 11, 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D.: 1982, ‘Durkheim and Mauss Revisited: Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 13(4), 267–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D.: 1983, Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D.: 1991a, ‘Ordinary Human Inference as Material for the Sociology of Knowledge’, Social Studies of Science 21, 129–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D.: 1991b, Knowledge and Social Imagery, Second Edition, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannigan, A.: 1981, The Social Basis for Scientific Discoveries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronowski, J.: 1965, Science and Human Values, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R.: 1989, The Rational and the Social, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1991, ‘A Critical Examination of the New Sociology of Science, Part I’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21(4), 524–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1969, American Power and the New Mandarins, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. & Pinch, T.: 1992, The Golem: What Everyone should Know about Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M.: 1991, Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. & Mauss, M.: 1963, Primitive Classification, translated and edited with an introduction by R. Needham, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1954, Ideas and Opinions, Crown Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, P.: 1971, ‘Weimar Culture, Causality and Quantum Theory, 1918–1927’. In R. McCormmach (ed.), Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T.F.: 1982, ‘Relativist/Constructivist Programmes in the Sociology of Science: Redundance and Retreat’ Social Studies of Science 12, 279–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W.K.C.: 1962, The History of Greek Philosophy: Vol. 1. The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G.H.: 1969, A Mathematician’s Apology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E.S. & Chomsky, N.: 1988, Manufacturing Consent, New York, Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., Holyoak, K., Nisbett, R., & Thagard, P.: 1986, Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley P., Simon, H., Bradshaw, G., & Zytkow, J.: 1987, Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. & Woolgar, S.: 1979, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. & Woolgar, S.: 1986, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd Edition, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1981, ‘The Pseudo Science of Science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 173–198. Reprinted in J.R. Brown (ed.), Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1990a, Science and Relativism, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1990b, ‘Demystifying Underdetermination’. In C. Wade Savage (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, XIV. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1988, ‘Panel Discussion: Construction and Constraint’. In E. McMullin (ed.), Construction and Constraint: The Shaping of Scientific Rationality, Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, pp.223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.: 1992a, ‘Editorial’, Science & Education 1(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.: 1992b, ‘History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching: The Present Rapprochement’, Science & Education 1(1), 11–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K.: 1942, ‘Science and Technology in a Democratic Order’, Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1. Reprinted as’ science and Democratic Social Structure’ in his Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, Free Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K.: 1957, ‘The Sociology of Knowledge’. In his Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: 1961, ‘On Liberty’. In The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill, edited by M. Cohen, New York, Random House, 185–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nola, R.: 1991, ‘Ordinary Human Inference as Refutation of the Strong Programme’, Social Studies of Science 21, 107–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C.: 1992, Uncritical Theory: Postmodernism, Intellectuals and the Gulf War, London, Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G.: 1984, The Penguin Essays of George Orwell, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (ed.): 1992, Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T.J.: 1993, ‘Generations of SSK’ Social Studies of Science 23, 363–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T.J. & Collins, H.M.: 1984, ‘Private Science and Public Knowledge: The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of the Paranormal and Its Use of the Literature’, Social Studies of Science 14, 521–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1963, ‘Back to the PreSocratics’ In his Conjectures and Refutations, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. pp. 136–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1966a, The Open Society and Its Enemies: Volume 2, Hegel and Marx, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1966b, The Poverty of Historicism, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1931, The Scientific Outlook, London, George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1946, The History of Western Philosophy, London, George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1961, ‘Education’. In R.E. Egner & L.E. Denonn (eds.), The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell, New York, Simon & Schuster, pp.401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S.: 1979, ‘Homo Phrenologicus: Anthropological Perspectives on an Historical Problem’. In B. Barnes & S. Shapin (eds.), Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, London, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S.: 1982, ‘History of Science and Its Sociological Reconstructions’, History of Science 20, 157–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H.: 1989, ‘The Rationality of Science, Critical Thinking and Science Education’, Synthese 80(1), 9–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrager, J. & Langley, P., (eds.): 1990, Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation, San Mateo, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slezak, P.: 1989, ‘Scientific Discovery by Computer as Refutation of the Strong Programme’ Social Studies of Science 19(4), 563–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slezak, P.: 1991, ‘Bloor’s Bluff: Behaviourism and the Strong Programme’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5(3), 241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slezak, P.: 1994a, ‘The Social Construction of Social Constructionism’ Inquiry, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slezak, P.: 1994b, ‘A Second Look at Bloor’s Knowledge and Social Imagery’ Philosophy of the Social Sciences, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.P.: 1969, Two Cultures and A Second Look, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stove, D.: 1991, The Plato Cult and Other Philosophical Follies. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slezak, P. (1998). Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Education: Part I. In: Matthews, M.R. (eds) Constructivism in Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5032-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5032-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4924-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5032-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics