Skip to main content

A Quantitative Model of Graphic Production

  • Chapter
Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 62))

Abstract

When producing a drawing and when copying a geometrical pattern, the subject organizes the sequence of his or her graphic movements (strokes) in a way which is by no means ad hoc or arbitrary. Specifically, the manual execution of a geometrical pattern appears to be governed by a set of biases determining the starting points, stroke directions and stroke order of the graphic-production sequence. These constraining principles are often called ‘rules’, although they have a probabilistic rather than a deterministic status. The ‘rules’ also appear to have different strength. The present study attempts to assess the strength values of each of eight such ‘rules’ given a specific set of patterns. The experiment collects stroke-sequence data of fifteen adult subjects copying a well-defined set of 149 geometrical patterns twice. Subsequently, their behavior is simulated by a computer algorithm in which the weights of eight ’rules’ are optimized, minimizing the deviation between the frequency distributions of the simulated and the original stroke sequences. The model operates in a probabilistic fashion according to several stages dealing with each subsequent stroke successively. The weights obtained allow the model to produce 88 percent of the patterns in the same way as the human subjects did. It is shown that further refinements should improve on this performance. A brief discussion of behavioral data such as reaction times and kinematic features illuminates the facilitatory function of several of the graphic production rules.

1) The reported research was in part performed by the second author as one of his MA assignments at the Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Nijmegen. It was conducted in the framework of NWO Project 560-259-035 ‘Graphic production’. Further support was received from ESPRIT Project 419 ‘Image and movement understanding’. The present article was written while the first author was a Fellow at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study (NIAS). Technical assistance by Dr. Frans Maarse and mathematical advice by Professor Eddy Roskam are gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Goodnow, J.J. & Levine, R.A. (1973). “The grammar of action”: Sequence and syntax in children’s copying. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J.J., Friedman, S.L., Bernbaum, M. & Lehman, E.B. (1973). Direction and sequence in copying: The effect of learning to write in English and Hebrew. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, E.B. & Goodnow, J.J. (1975). Directionality in copying: Memory, handedness, and alignment effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 863–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maarse, F.J. (1987). The study of handwriting movement: Peripheral models and signal processing techniques. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulenbroek, R.G.J. & Thomassen, A.J.W.M. (1990). Stroke-direction preferences in drawing and handwriting. Human Movement Science, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulenbroek, R.G.J. & Thomassen, A.J.W.M. (in preparation). Stroke-direction preferences as a function of arm position, handedness, and hand posture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachshon, I. (1983). Directional preferences of bilingual children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 741– 750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachshon, I. & Alek, M. (1981). The development of directional preferences: Cross-cultural differences. Psychologia, 24, 86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nihei, Y. (1983). Developmental change in drawing and handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 221–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ninio, A. & Lieblich, A. (1976). The grammar of action: Phrase structure in children’s copying. Child Development, 47, 846–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A., and Jorgensen, M.J. (1991). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control. Human Movement Science, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A., Vaughan, J., Barnes, H.J., Marchak, F., and Slotta, J. (1990). Constraints on action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 321–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simner, M.L. (1981). The grammar of action in children’s printing. Developmental Psychology, 17, 866– 871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simner, M.L. (1984). The grammar of action and reversal errors in children’s printing. Developmental Psychology, 20, 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, M.M. (1989). Visual control of movement patterns and the grammar of action. Acta Psychologica, 70, 253–265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teulings, H.-L. & Maarse, F.J. (1984). Digital recording and processing of handwriting movements. Human Movement Science, 3, 193–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teulings, H.-L. & Thomassen, A.J.W.M. (1979). Computer-aided analysis of handwriting movements. Visible Language, 13, 218–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, A.J.W.M., Meulenbroek, R.G.J. & Hoofs, M.P.E. (1991). Economy and anticipation in graphic stroke sequences. Human Movement Science, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, A.J.W.M., Meulenbroek, R.G.J., and Tibosch, H.J.C.M. (1990). Latencies and kinematics reflect graphic production rules. Human Movement Science, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, A.J.W.M. & Teulings, H.-L. (1979). The development of diretcional preference in writing movements. Visible Language, 13, 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, A.J.W.M., Tibosch, H.J.C.M., and Maarse, F.J. (1989). The effect of context on stroke direction and stroke order in handwriting. In R. PLamondon, C.Y. Suen, and M.L. Simner, (Eds.), Computer recognition and human production of handwriting. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Sommers, P. (1989). A system for drawing and drawing-related neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 117–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomassen, A.J.W.M., Tibosch, H.J.C.M. (1991). A Quantitative Model of Graphic Production. In: Requin, J., Stelmach, G.E. (eds) Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience. NATO ASI Series, vol 62. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3626-6_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3626-6_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5609-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3626-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics