Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter reports initial findings from a study of the thinking, beliefs and tutorial action of higher education teachers who are working in a ‘virtual classroom’. The teachers work on an ‘online learning’ course at the Masters level. An important means of communication on this course is computer conferencing. The work of the teachers is centred upon reading and constructing electronic texts — contributions to an ongoing ‘electronic seminar’. The research setting allows an unusual degree of access to the thinking of teachers during the process of teaching. It also allows access to the thinking of teachers during the whole of the (relatively short) cycle of planning, teaching and reflection that surrounds each moment for intervention in the electronic seminar. The chapter offers two contributions to our understanding of online teaching. First, it begins to locate online teaching in relation to other forms of teaching by providing an analysis of how some common kinds of online teaching are undertaken. Second, through illustrations of the work of one experienced online teacher — supplemented by data taken from their ‘think aloud’ protocols and from interview transcripts — it highlights some key areas of knowledge and belief that seem to be a critical part of online teaching. The chapter discusses both substantive findings about relationships between teachers’ thinking, beliefs and practices, and methodological issues raised by this relatively novel research site. It concludes with some suggestions for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexandersson, M. (1994). Focusing teacher consciousness: What do teachers direct their consciousness towards during their teaching? In I. Carlgren, G. Handal & S. Vaage (Eds.), Teachers’ mind and actions. Research on teacher thinking and practice (pp. 139–149). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, S., & Bryson, M. (1998). Using Lotus Notes for asynchronous, collaborative learning and research. In R. Hazemi, S. Hailes & S. Wilbur (Eds.), The digital university: Reinventing the academy (pp. 195–207). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ASTER. (1999). A survey of current practice in the use of C&IT to support small-group teaching activities in disciplines associated with the Humanities, Physics and Psychology (ASTER Report 2). York: York University, ASTER Project Team.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, D., & Molotch, H. (1994). The compulsion of proximity. In R. Friedland & D. Boden (Eds.), Now Here: space, time and modernity (pp. 257–286). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C, & King, K. (Eds.). (1998). Electronic collaborators: Learner centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship and discourse. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C, & Gerber, R. (1995). Towards university lecturers’ conceptions of student learning. Higher Education, 29, 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1984). Teachers’ classroom decision making, London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (Ed.) (1987). Exploring teachers’ thinking. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: MacMilian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B. (1996). Tele-learning in a digital world. London: International Thomson Computer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G., Sussex, R., & Cropp, S. (1994). The Teacher-Learner-Computer triangle in CALL: Frameworks for interaction and advice. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Journal, 7, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, C, Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. (Eds.) (1990). Insight into teacher’s thinking and practice. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C, Calderhead, J., & Denicolo, P. (Eds.) (1993). Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S., & Potts, M. (1998). How tutors model students: A study of personal constructs in adaptive tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 65–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, M., & Barnes, J. (1986). Research on teaching in higher education. In M. Wittrock (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbaz, F. (1990). Knowledge and discourse: The evolution of research on teacher thinking. In C. Day, M. Pope & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Insight into teacher’s thinking and practice (pp. 15–42). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised edition). Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, P., Goodyear, P., Heseltine, R., Lewis, R., Darby, J., Graves, J., Sartorius, P., Harwood, D., & King, T. (1996). Managing change in higher education: A learning environment architecture. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P. (1989). Expert systems and intelligent tutoring: Some issues in the engineering of pedagogic knowledge. In H. Oosthoek & T. Vroeijenstijn (Eds.), Higher Education and the New Technologies (pp. 45–51). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P. (Ed.) (1991). Teaching knowledge and intelligent tutoring. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P. (1995). Asynchronous peer interaction in distance education: The evolution of goals, practices and technology. Training Research Journal, 1, 71–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Steeples, C. (1993). Computer-mediated communication in the professional development of workers in the advanced learning technologies industry. In J. Eccleston, B. Barta & R. Hambusch (Eds), The computer-mediated education of information technology professionals and advanced end-users. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Steeples, C. (1999a). Teaching with ICT: Competences and craft knowledge. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Learning Technology, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Steeples, C. (1999b). Asynchronous multimedia conferencing in continuing professional development: Issues in the representation of practice through user-created videoclips. Distance Education, 20(1), 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L. et al (1994). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell-Richardson, C, & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses. Instructional Science, 24(1), 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (1999). Co-operating to collaborate: Course delivery using computer conferencing in higher education. In A. Eurelings, F. Gastkemper, P. Komers, R. Lewis, R. van Meel & B. Melief (Eds.), Integrating information and communication technology in higher education (pp. 247–269). Deventer: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C, Asensio, M., & Goodyear, P. (2000). Networked learning in higher education: Practitioner perspectives. Journal of the Association for Learning Technology, 8(2), 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C, & Cawood, J. (1998). The unreliable transcript, contingent technology and informal practice in asynchronous learning networks. Proceedings of the Networked Lifelong Learning conference, Sheffield University, April, (<http://www.shef.ac.uk/uni/projects/csnl/labs.html>)

  • Kamsteeg, P., & Bierman, D. (1991). Teacher thinking, learner thinking: think aloud protocol analysis in tutoring systems research. In P. Goodyear (Ed.) (1991), Teaching knowledge and intelligent tutoring (pp. 187–202). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, S. (1984). Describing teachers’ conceptions of their professional world. In R. Halkes & J. Olson (Eds.), Teacher thinking (pp. 123–133). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. (1988). Situated knowledge and expertise in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed), Teachers’ professional learning (pp. 146–168). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (1994). Using communications media in open and flexible learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., & Kaye, A. (Eds.) (1989). Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning (2nd ed.). Kogan Page: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K., & Macdonald, R. (1997). The disjunction between lecturers’ conceptions of teaching and their claimed educational practice. Higher Education, 33(3), 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidu, S., & Oliver, M. (1999). Critical incident-based computer supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 27(5), 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., & Wilson T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. (1995). The online report on pedagogical techniques for computer-mediated communication (http://www.nki.no/~morten)

  • Peterson, P., & Clark, C. (1978). Teachers’ reports on their cognitive processes during teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 555–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A Phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, M. (1991). Computer mediated communications: Bulletin boards, computer conferencing, electronic mail, and information retrieval. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rief M. M., & Levin, J. A. (1990). Building electronic communities: Success and failure in computer networking. Instructional Science, 19, 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelston, R., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgements, decisions and behaviour. Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 455–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 14(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., & Kollock, P. (Eds.) (1999). Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, B. (1998). Dynamic instructional decision-making: PEPE and GTE. Instructional Science, 26(3–4), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. (1991). A model of classroom processes: Towards the formalization of experienced teachers’ professional knowledge. In P. Goodyear (Ed.) (1991), Teaching knowledge and intelligent tutoring (pp. 297–314). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, R. (1986). Examining thought in action: A theoretical and methodological critique of research on interactive teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(3), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodyear, P. (2002). Teaching Online. In: Hativa, N., Goodyear, P. (eds) Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0593-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0593-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0095-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0593-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics