Abstract
The recent, and apparently growing, trend among linguists to ransack textbooks of logic might be merely an intellectual fashion, destined like all fashions to fade. But it would be foolish, if not insulting, simply to dismiss it in this way, especially as the interest has not been entirely one-sided. Philosophers, too, are becoming increasingly keen, despite the inaccessibility of some of the material, to acquaint themselves with the results of linguistic research (see, for example, Vendler, 1967). When two disciplines start to become conscious of each other, this awareness may reveal something of interest about the nature of the problems, whether substantive or methodological, which they then find themselves confronting. The boundaries between disciplines are notoriously complex and untidy, and all we can hope to do here is to delineate roughly some of the many interconnexions between logic and linguistics, and then to consider to what extent and in what ways we might expect them to gain by contact with each other. And whether or not the benefits are really all on one side, we may perhaps, as linguists, be forgiven for revealing a selfish preoccupation with what the study of formal logic has to offer us.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Chomsky, N., Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965.
Grice, H. P., “Logic and Conversation”, Unpublished MS. of the William James Lectures, Harvard University, 1967. (Partially printed as Grice (1975) and Grice (1978).)
Grice, H. P., “Logic and Conversation”, In Cole, P. and J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 8: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, 1975, 41–58.
Grice, H. P., “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation”, In Cole, P. (Ed), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 1978, 113–28.
Hintikka, J., Knowledge and Belief. New York: Cornell University Press, 1962.
Hughes, G.E. and J.J. Cresswell, An Introduction to Modal Logic. London: Methuen, 1968.
Katz, J. and Postal, P., An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. (Research Monographs, 26). Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1964.
Lewis, C.I. and C.H. Langford, Symbolic Logic, 2nd ed. New York: Dover Publications, 1959.
Prior, A.N., Time and Modality, 2nd Edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.
Quine, W.V., Words and Object, Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1960.
Quine, W.V., Selected Logic Papers, New York: Random House, 1966.
Reichenbach, H., Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York: Macmillan Co., 1947.
Strawson, P.F., Introduction to Logical Theory, London: Methuen, 1952.
Vendler, Z., Linguistics in Philosophy, New York: Cornell University Press, 1967.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1970 Penguin Books, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fodor, J.D. (1970). Formal Linguistics and Formal Logic. In: Savitch, W.J., Bach, E., Marsh, W., Safran-Naveh, G. (eds) The Formal Complexity of Natural Language. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3401-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3401-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-047-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3401-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive