Abstract
This chapter discusses approaches to teaching algebraic concepts like variables that are embedded in a Standards-based mathematics curriculum (CMP) and in a traditional mathematics curriculum (Glencoe Mathematics). Neither the CMP curriculum nor Glencoe Mathematics clearly distinguishes among the various uses of variables. Overall, the CMP curriculum uses a functional approach to teach equation solving, while Glencoe Mathematics uses a structural approach to teach equation solving. The functional approach emphasizes the important ideas of change and variation in situations and contexts. The structural approach, on the other hand, avoids contextual problems in order to concentrate on developing the abilities to generalize, work abstractly with symbols, and follow procedures in a systematic way. This chapter reports part of the findings from the larger LieCal research project. The LieCal Project is designed to investigate longitudinally the impact of a Standards-based curriculum like CMP on teachers’ classroom instruction and student learning. This chapter tells part of the story by showing the value of a detailed curriculum analysis in characterizing curriculum as a pedagogical event.
Research reported in this chapter is supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (ESI-0454739 and DRL-1008536). Any opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Science Foundation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In 2006 and 2009, the CMP authors published revised editions of the CMP curriculum under the name CMP2. CMP3 was published in 2013. This article is based on the original CMP curriculum because the students in the LieCal project used CMP, not CMP2 or CMP3.
References
Algebra Working Group to the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1997). A framework for constructing a vision of algebra: a discussion document. Reston: NCTM.
Bailey, R., Day, R., Frey, P., Howard, A. C., Hutchens, D. T., McClain, K., et al. (2006a). Mathematics: applications and concepts. Columbus: The McGraw-Hill Company (teacher wraparound edition), course 1.
Bailey, R., Day, R., Frey, P., Howard, A. C., Hutchens, D. T., McClain, K., et al. (2006b). Mathematics: applications and concepts. Columbus: The McGraw-Hill Company (teacher wraparound edition), course 2.
Bailey, R., Day, R., Frey, P., Howard, A. C., Hutchens, D. T., McClain, K., et al. (2006c). Mathematics: applications and concepts. Columbus: The McGraw-Hill Company (teacher wraparound edition), course 3.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: what is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8, 14.
Bednarz, N., Kieran, C., & Lee, L. (Eds.) (1996). Approaches to algebra: perspectives for research and teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cai, J. (2010). Evaluation of mathematics education programs. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGraw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 653–659). Oxford: Elsevier.
Cai, J., Lo, J. J., & Watanabe, T. (2002). Intended treatment of arithmetic average in U.S. and Asian school mathematics textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 102(8), 391–404.
Cai, J., Nie, B., & Moyer, J. (2010). The teaching of equation solving: approaches in standards-based and traditional curricula in the United States. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(3), 170–186.
Cai, J., Ni, Y., & Lester, F. K. Jr. (2011a). Curricular effect on the teaching and learning of mathematics: findings from two longitudinal studies in China and the United States. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 63–64.
Cai, J., Wang, N., Moyer, J. C., Wang, C., & Nie, B. (2011b). Longitudinal investigation of the curriculum effect: an analysis of student learning outcomes from the LieCal project. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 117–136.
Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (in press). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486–516). New York: Macmillan.
Janvier, C. (1996). Modeling and the initiation to algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 225–236). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 317–326.
Kieran, C., Boileau, A., & Garançon, M. (1996). Introducing algebra by means of a technology supported functional approach. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 257–293). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2002a). Variables and patterns. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2002b). Moving straight ahead. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2002c). Getting to know connected mathematics: an implementation guide. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2002d). Lesson planner for grades 6, 7, and 8. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2002e). Data about us. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Moyer, J. C., Cai, J., Nie, B., & Wang, N. (2011). Impact of curriculum reform: evidence of change in classroom instruction in the United States. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 87–99.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.
Nemirovsky, R. (1996). Mathematical narratives, modeling and algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra. Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 197–220). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nie, B., Cai, J., & Moyer, J. C. (2009). How a standards-based mathematics curriculum differs from a traditional curriculum: with a focus on intended treatments of the ideas of variable. ZDM—International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(6), 777–792.
Schoenfeld, H. A., & Arcavi, A. (1988). On the meaning of variable. The Mathematics Teacher, 81(6), 420–427.
Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. F. Coxford (Ed.), The ideas of algebra, K-12 (pp. 8–19). Reston: NCTM.
Wheeler, D. (1996). Backwards and forwards: reflections on different approaches to algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 317–325). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cai, J., Nie, B., Moyer, J.C., Wang, N. (2014). Teaching Mathematics Using Standards-Based and Traditional Curricula: A Case of Variable Ideas. In: Li, Y., Lappan, G. (eds) Mathematics Curriculum in School Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7559-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7560-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)