Skip to main content

Evaluation of Seakeeping Predictions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics

Abstract

Test cases related to seakeeping are studied in this chapter including heave and pitch with or without surge motion in regular head waves for KVLCC2 and KCS and wave diffraction and roll-decay with forward speed for DTMB 5415. For seakeeping, the total average error is E = 23 %D, comparable to the average error for previous seakeeping predictions. For resistance, the largest error values are for the 1st harmonic amplitude and phase (34 %D), followed by 0th harmonic amplitude (18 %D) and steady (7 %D). For motions, the largest error values are for the 0th harmonic amplitudes (54 %D), followed by 1st harmonic amplitude and phase (13 %D) and steady (9 %D). The errors for the CFD predictions are similar for the different geometries and wavelengths, the small and large amplitude waves, and for the cases with and without surge motion. The errors are larger for the cases with zero forward speed. Compared with potential flow, CFD showed larger errors for motions for the medium and long wavelengths. For wave diffraction submissions, the large grid size DES simulation has achieved an average error value of less than 10 %D, while for the small grid size URANS simulations the average error is 28 %D. For roll decay submissions, the average error values are 10 %D for resistance and less than 1 %D for roll motions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck RF, Reed AM (2000) Modern computational methods for ships in a seaway. Proceedings of 23rd ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Val de Reuil, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap W, Bassler C, Hughes M (2010) Comparisons of body-exact force computations in large amplitude motion. 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Pasadena, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnik T, Daalen EV, Kapsenberg G, Shin Y, Huijsmans R, Deng G, Delhommeau G, Kashiwagi M, Beck B (2010) A – comparative study on state-of-the-art prediction tools for seakeeping. 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Pasadena, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Stern F (2006) Unsteady RANS simulations of the ship forward speed diffraction problem. Comput Fluids 35(6):545–570

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Noack RW, Stern F (2007) Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids. Comput Fluids 36(9):1415–1433

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carrica PM, Fu H, Stern F (2010) Self-propulsion free to sink and trim and pitch and heave in head waves of a Kcs model. Proceedings of Gothenburg 2010: A Workshop on CFD in Ship Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiglione T, Stern F, Bova S, Kandasamy M, (2011) Numerical investigation of the seakeeping behavior of a catamaran advancing in regular head waves. Ocean Eng 38(16):1806–1822

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng GB, Leroyer A, Guilmineau E, Queutey P, Visonneau M, Wackers J (2010) Verification and validation for unsteady computation. Proceedings of Gothenburg 2010: A Workshop on CFD in Ship Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbri L, Campana E, Simonsen C (2011) An experimental study of the water depth effects on the KVLCC2 tanker. AVT-189 Specialists Meeting on Assessment of Stability and Control Prediction Methods for NATO Air and Sea Vehicles, Portsdown West, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Faltinsen OM (1990) Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge University press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossen TI (2005) A nonlinear unified state-space model for ship maneuvering and control in seaways. J Bifurcat Chaos. doi:10.1142/S0218127405013691

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossen TI (2011) Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control. John Wiley & Sons Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui L, Longo L, Metcal B, Shao J, Stern F (2002) Forces, moment, and wave pattern for naval combatant in regular head waves-part 2: measurement results and discussions. Exp Fluids 32(1):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Diez M, Peri D, Campana EC, Tahara Y, Stern F (2012) URANS study of delft catamaran total/added resistance, motions and slamming loads in heading sea including irregular wave and uncertainty quantification for variable regular wave and geometry. 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics Gothenburg, Sweden, 26–31 August 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Hino T (ed.) (2005) Proceedings of CFD workshop, NMRI report, Tokyo 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman M (2010) Gothenburg 2010 submission for Case 3.2 using CFDShip-Iowa V4. Proceedings of Gothenburg 2010: A Workshop on CFD in Ship Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine M, Longo J, Stern F (2004) Towing tank tests for surface combatant for free roll decay and coupled pitch and heave motions. Proceedings of 25th ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, St Johns, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine M, Longo J, Stern F (2008) Pitch and heave tests and uncertainty assessment for a surface combatant in regular head waves. J Ship Res 52(2):146–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandasamy M, Ooi SK, Carrica PM, Stern F (2010) Integral force/moment water-jet model for CFD simulations. J Fluid Eng 132:101103-1-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashiwagi M (2009) Impact of hull design on added resistance in waves—application of the enhanced unified theory. Proceedings of the 10th International Marine Design Conference, Trondheim, Norway, pp 521–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Joncquez SAG (2009) Second-Order Forces and Moments acting on Ships in Waves. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim WJ, Van SH, Kim DH (2001) Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models. Exp Fluids 31:567–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson L, Stern F, Visonneau M (eds) (2010) Gothenburg 2010: a workshop on numerical ship hydrodynamics. Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo J, Stern F (2005) Uncertainty assessment for towing tank tests with example for surface combatant DTMB model 5415. J Ship Res 49(1):55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo J, Shao J, Irvine M, Stern F (2007) Phase-averaged PIV for the nominal wake of a surface ship in regular head waves. J Fluid Eng 129:524–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousaviraad SM, Carrica PM, Stern F (2010) development and validation of harmonic wave group single-run procedure for RAO with comparison to regular wave and transient wave group procedures using URANS. Ocean Eng 37(8):653–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadat-Hosseini H, Stern F, Olivieri A, Campana E, Hashimoto H, Umeda N, Bulian G, Francescutto A (2010) Head-waves parametric rolling of surface combatant. Ocean Eng 37(10):859–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadat-Hosseini H, Carrica PM, Stern F, Umeda N, Hashimoto H, Yamamura S, Mastuda A (2011) CFD, system-based and EFD study of ship dynamic instability events: surf-riding, periodic motion, and broaching. Ocean Eng 38(1):88–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadat-Hosseini H, Wu PC, Carrica PM, Kim H, Toda Y, Stern F (2013) CFD verification and validation of added resistance and motions of KVLCC2 with fixed and free surge in short and long head waves. Ocean Eng 59:240–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Sen D (2007) A comparative linear and nonlinear ship motion study using 3-D time domain methods. Ocean Eng 34:1863–1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen CD, Otzen JF, Stern F (2008) EFD and CFD for KCS heaving and pitching in regular head waves. Proceedings of 27th ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen CD, Otzen JF, Joncquez S, Stern F (2012) EFD and CFD for KCS heaving and pitching in regular head waves. submitted to Ocean Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • SIMMAN (2014) http://www.simman2014.dk.

  • Stern F, Longo J, Penna R, Oliviera A, Ratcliffe T, Coleman H (2000) International collaboration on benchmark CFD validation data for naval surface combatant. Invited Paper: Proceedings of 23rd ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Val de Reuil, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern F, Wilson RV, Coleman H, Paterson E (2001) Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations-part 1: methodology and procedures. J Fluid Eng 123(4):793–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern F, Olivieri A, Shao J, Longo J, Ratcliffe T (2004) Statistical approach for estimating intervals of certification or biases of facilities or measurement systems including uncertainties. IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, The University of Iowa, IIHR Report No 442, pp 67

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern F, Olivieri A, Shao J, Longo J, Ratcliffe T (2005) Statistical approach for estimating intervals of certification or biases of facilities or measurement systems including uncertainties. J Fluid Eng 127:604–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern F, Carrica P, Kandasamy M, Gorski J, O’Dea J, Hughes M, Miller R, Kring D, Milewski W, Hoffman R, Cary C (2007) Computational hydrodynamic tools for high-speed sealift. Trans Soc Naval Archit Marine Eng 114:55–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern F, Agdrup K, Kim SY, Hochbaum AC, Rhee KP, Quadvlieg F, Perdon P, Hino T, Broglia R, Gorski J (2011) Experience from SIMMAN 2008—the first workshop on verification and validation of ship maneuvering simulation methods. J Ship Res 55(2):135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Takai T, Kandasamy M, Stern F (2011) Verification and validation study of URANS simulations for an axial waterjet propelled large high-speed ship. J Mar Sci Technol 16(4):434–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarafder S (2007) Third order contribution to the wave-making resistance of a ship at finite depth of water. Ocean Eng 34(1):32–44. (January 2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarafder S, Khalil G (2006) Calculation of ship sinkage and trim in deep water using a potential based panel method. Int J Appl Mech Eng 11(2):401–414

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Toxopeus S, Simonsen C, Guilmineau E, Visonneauc M, Stern F (2011) Viscous-flow calculations for KVLCC2 in manoeuvring motion in deep and shallow water. AVT-189 Specialists Meeting on Assessment of Stability and Control Prediction Methods for NATO Air and Sea Vehicles, Portsdown West, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Weymouth G, Wilson R, Stern F (2005) RANS CFD predictions of pitch and heave ship motions in head seas. J Ship Res 49:80–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RV, Carrica PM, Stern F (2006) Unsteady RANS method for ship motions with application to roll for a surface combatant. Comput Fluids 35(5):419–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing T, Carrica P, Stern F (2008) Computational towing tank procedures for single run curves of resistance and propulsion. J Fluid Eng 130(10):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing T, Carrica P, Stern F (2011) Developing streamlined version of CFDShip-Iowa-4.5. IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, The University of Iowa, IIHR Report No. 479, pp 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev Z, Milanov E, Chotukova V, Sakamoto N, Stern F (2009) Combined model-scale EFD-CFD investigation of the maneuvering characteristics of a high speed catamaran. Proceedings of FAST 2009: The 10th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, Athens, Greece

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research at Iowa was sponsored by Office of Naval Research under Grant Nos. N00014-01-1-0073 and N00014-06-1-0420 administered by Dr. Patrick Purtell. The authors would like to thank Dr. Dave Kring, Dr. Arthur Reed and Prof. Bob Beck for their helpful comments, especially Prof. Beck who patiently went through several iterations, which clarified our analysis and conclusions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick Stern .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stern, F., Sadat-Hosseini, H., Mousaviraad, M., Bhushan, S. (2014). Evaluation of Seakeeping Predictions. In: Larsson, L., Stern, F., Visonneau, M. (eds) Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7189-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7189-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7188-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7189-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics