Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Crime Scene Locations in Criminal Homicides: A Spatial Crime Analysis in a GIS Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Crime Modeling and Mapping Using Geospatial Technologies

Part of the book series: Geotechnologies and the Environment ((GEOTECH,volume 8))

Abstract

Law enforcement agencies recently have recognized the significance and impact that comes from a better understanding of the dynamics of crime in a geographical perspective. In particular, due to its complex nature, analyzing criminal homicide is often challenging when connecting multiple locations to persons involved in crimes in order to solve cases. The main purpose of this study is to provide an analytical framework to understand criminal homicide from a socio-geographical perspective using GIS. This chapter explores how social relationships between victims and offenders, and the spatial characteristic of a community, affect the geographical pattern of underlying locations in criminal homicides. We propose a conceptual model named Spatial Configurations of Homicide Crime (SCHC), which categorizes sequences of homicides from a geographical perspective. The spatial configurations of criminal homicides is defined by combinations of locations including: Offender’s residence (O), Victim’s residence (V), Murder location (M), and Disposal location of victim (D), all of which are expressed as a set of (O, V, M, D). The relationships between SCHC and (1) social relationships among victims and offenders, (2) the context of the crimes, and (3) the ethnic composition of people within a community, are analyzed with Multinomial Logit Models (MNL). Based on geospatial analysis using GIS, this chapter identifies the critical socio-geographic factors and reveals the structure of locational components in homicidal crimes. A case study with more than 300 homicide incidents in Hillsborough County, Florida from 1997 to 2007 demonstrates social relationships among victims and offenders in their geographical locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avakame EF (1998) How different is violence in the home? An examination of some correlates of stranger and intimate homicide. Criminology 36(3):601–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham P, Brantingham P (1984) Patterns in crime. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges GS, Crutchfield RD, Simpson EE (1987) Crime, social structure, and criminal punishment: white and non-white rates of imprisonment. Soc Probl 34(4):345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broidy LM, Daday JK, Crandall CS, Sklar DP, Frost PF (2006) Exploring demographic, structural, and behavioral overlap among homicide offenders and victims. Homicide Stud 10(3):155–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canter P (2000) Using a geographic information system for tactical crime analysis. In: Goldsmith V, McGuire PG, Mollenkopf JH, Ross TA (eds) Analyzing crime patterns: frontiers of practice. Sage Publications, London, pp 3–10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen L, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44(4):588–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis LA (1974) Criminal violence: national patterns and behavior. Lexington Books, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly M, Wilson M (1988) Homicide. Aldine De Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker SH (1996) Deviant homicide: a new look at the role of motives and victim-offender relationships. J Res Crime Delinq 33(4):427–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (2004) Uniform crime reporting handbook. United States Department of Justice, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson RB, Messner SF (1998) Disentangling the effects of gender and intimacy on victim precipitation in homicide. Criminology 36(2):405–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank R, Andresen MA, Felson M (2012) The geodiversity of crime: evidence from British Columbia. Appl Geogr 34:180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey WH, Zimmer Z (2001) Defining the city. In: Paddison R (ed) Handbook of urban studies. Sage Publications, London, pp 14–35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne P (1992) Appalachian women: violence and social control. J Contemp Ethnogr 20(4):387–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groff E, McEwen T (2006) Exploring the spatial configuration of places related to homicide events: final report. Institute for Law and Justice, Alexandria, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubesic TH, Mack EA (2008) Spatio-temporal interaction of urban crime. J Quant Criminol 24(3):285–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harries KD (1997) Serious violence: patterns of homicide and assault in America. Charles C Thomas Pub Ltd, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office (2007) Police report of criminal homicides 1997–2007, Tampa

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keppel R, Weis J (1994) Time and distance as solvability factors in murder cases. J Forensic Sci JFSCA 39(2):386–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritsen JL, Schaum RJ (2004) The social ecology of violence against women. Criminology 42(2):323–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall PL, Parker KF, MacDonald JM (2008) The dynamic relationship between homicide rates and social, economic, and political factors from 1970 to 2000. Soc Sci Res 37(3):721–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner SF, Tardiff K (1985) The social ecology of urban homicide: an application of the “routine activities” approach. Criminology 23(2):241–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner SF, Anselin L, Baller RD, Hawkins DF, Deane G, Tolnay SE (1999) The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: an application of exploratory spatial data analysis. J Quant Criminol 15(4):423–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miethe TD, Regoeczi WC (2004) Rethinking homicide: exploring the structure and process underlying deadly situations. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller HJ (2005) A measurement theory for time geography. Geogr Anal 37:17–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polk K (1993) Observations on stranger homicide. J Crim Justice 21(6):573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe J (2010) Crime mapping: spatial and temporal challenges. In: Piquero AR, Weisburd D (eds) Handbook of quantitative criminology. Springer Science  +  Business Media, LLC, New York, pp 5–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rossmo DK (1999) Geographic profiling. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco VF, Johnson H, Arnold R (1993) Urban-rural residence and criminal victimization. Can J Sociol 18(4):431–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santtila P, Laukkanen M, Zappala A (2007) Crime behaviours and distance travelled in homicides and rapes. J Investig Psychol Offender Profil 4(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman RA, Kennedy LW (1987) Relational distance and homicide: the roles of the stranger. J Crim Law Criminol 78(2):272–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snook B, Cullen RM, Mokros A, Harbort S (2005) Serial murderer’s spatial decisions: factors that influence crime location choice. J Investig Psychol Offender Profil 2:147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swatt ML, He N (2006) Exploring the difference between male and female intimate partner homicides: revisiting the concept of situated transactions. Homicide Stud 10(4):279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tampa Police Department (2007) Police report of criminal homicides 1997–2007, Tampa

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple Terrace Police Department (2007) Police report of criminal homicides 1997–2007, Tampa

    Google Scholar 

  • Tita G, Griffiths E (2005) Traveling to violence: the case for a mobility-based spatial typology of homicide. J Res Crime Delinq 42(3):275–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2000) Census of population and housing supplement. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Patten IT, Delhauer PQ (2007) Sexual homicide: a spatial analysis of 25 years of deaths in Los Angeles. J Forensic Sci 52(5):1129–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Websdale N (1999) Understanding domestic homicide. Northeastern University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang ME (1958) Patterns in criminal homicide. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang ME (1967) Studies in homicide. Harper and Row Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye X, Wu L (2011) Analyzing the dynamics of homicide patterns in Chicago: ESDA and spatial panel approaches. Appl Geogr 31(2):800–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Tennessee, 311 Burchfiel Geography Building, 1000 Philip Fulmer Way, Knoxville, TN, 37996-0925, USA

    Hyun Kim

  2. School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W. Campbell Rd, Richardson, 75080-3021, USA

    Yongwan Chun

  3. Southwestern Institute of Forensic Sciences, 2355 North Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, TX, USA, 75207

    Casey Anderson Gould

Authors
  1. Hyun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yongwan Chun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Casey Anderson Gould
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Geography & Anthropology, Louisiana State University, E104 Howe-Russell Geoscience Bldg., Baton Rouge, 70803, USA

    Michael Leitner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, H., Chun, Y., Gould, C.A. (2013). Crime Scene Locations in Criminal Homicides: A Spatial Crime Analysis in a GIS Environment. In: Leitner, M. (eds) Crime Modeling and Mapping Using Geospatial Technologies. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4997-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation