Skip to main content

Introduction: From Philosophy to Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Biology of Happiness

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research ((BRIEFSWELLBEING))

  • 1671 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses what happiness is about, and whether ‘happiness' can be used as a term for what should be the primary goal for both the individual and society. A historical look at thoughts about happiness is offered, as well as a discussion of the various terms used in this context. The chapter also covers an introduction to the evolutionary perspective of understanding the human mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdallah, S., Thompson, S., Michaelson, J., Marks, N., & Steuer, N. (2009). The happy planet index 2.0. London: New Economic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aked, J., Marks, N., Cordon, C., & Thompson, S. (2008). Five ways to well-being. London: New Economic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balter, M. (2011). Was North Africa the launch pad for modern human migrations? Science, 331, 20–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belliotti, R. (2004). Happiness is overrated. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology-Science and Practice, 11, 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J. (2004). Well-being and affective style: Neural substrates and biobehavioural correlates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 359, 1395–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker. London: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helltwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, 678–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinde, B. (1996). Darwinian happiness: Biological advice on the quality of life. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 19, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinde, B. (2002a). Happiness in the perspective of evolutionary psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinde, B. (2002b). Darwinian happiness—Evolution as a guide for living and understanding human behavior. Princeton: The Darwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinde, B. (2004). Can the evolutionary perspective on well-being help us improve society? World Futures, 60, 317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson R (2010) The brain: So what? The Wise Brain Bulletin. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haybron, D. M. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1988). The sense of relative superiority—Central to well-being. Social Indicators Research, 20, 497–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoorens, V. (1995). Self-favoring biases, self-presentation, and the self-other asymmetry in social-comparison. Journal of Personality, 63, 793–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 107, 16489–16493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koob, G. F., & Le, M. M. (1997). Drug abuse: Hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science, 278, 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lama, D., & Cutler, H. C. (2000). The art of happiness: A handbook for living. Sydney: Hodder Headline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness—lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, M. R., & Butryn, M. L. (2007). Hedonic hunger: A new dimension of appetite? Physiology and Behavior, 91, 432–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being. American Psychologist, 56, 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theoy and research. In S. Lopex & C. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W. (2008). The assessment of subjective well-being: Successes and shortfalls. In M. Eid & R. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 124–140). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 582–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronin, E. (2007). Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricard, M. (2007). Happiness—A guide to developing life’s most important skill. Boston: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. (2000). Learning about happiness from persons with Down syndrome: Feeling the sense of joy and contentment. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 105, 372–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slagter, H. A., Davidson, R. J., & Lutz, A. (2011). Mental training as a tool in the neuroscientific study of brain and cognitive plasticity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. A., Beaudet, A. L., Clayton-Smith, J., Knoll, J. H., Kyllerman, M., Laan, L. A., et al. (2006). Angelman syndrome 2005: Updated consensus for diagnostic criteria. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 140, 413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, D., Chiu, C. Y., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2009). What constitutes a good life? Cultural differences in the role of positive and negative affect in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 77, 1167–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bjørn Grinde .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grinde, B. (2012). Introduction: From Philosophy to Science. In: The Biology of Happiness. SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4393-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics