Synonyms
Definition
Critical disability theory is rooted in a critique of traditional discourses and assumptions of disability which serve to oppress persons with disabilities and infringe on their human rights. The theory is built upon the argument that “disability is not fundamentally a question of medicine or health, nor is it just an issue of sensitivity and compassion; rather, it is a question of politics and power(lessness), power over, and power to” (Devlin & Pothier, 2006, p. 2). This perspective challenges able-bodied supremacy and the oppression that arises from restricting economic and social benefits to persons with disabilities which are then redistributed as privileges to be negotiated (Oliver & Barnes, 1993; Rioux & Frazee, 1999; Rioux & Prince, 2002). Critical disability theory moves away from the individual pathology of disability (based on the biomedical model), and beyond liberalism and a social model of disability, toward...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bagenstos, S. (2003). “Rational discrimination,” accommodation, and the politics of (disability) civil rights. Virginia Law Review, 89(5), 825–923.
Bagenstos, S. (2004a). The future of disability law. Yale Law Journal, 114(1), 1–84.
Bagenstos, S. (2004b). Justice Ginsburg and the judicial role in expanding “we the people”: The disability rights cases. Columbia Law Review, 104(1), 49–59.
Bichenbach, J. (2001). Disability human rights, law, and policy. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 565–584). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Blanck, P., Wilichowski, A., & Schmeling, J. (2004). Disability civil rights law and policy: Accessible courtroom technology. The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 12(3), 825–842.
Devlin, R., & Pothier, D. (2006). Introduction: Toward a critical theory of dis-citizenship. In D. Pothier & R. Devlin (Eds.), Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law. Toronto, ON: UBC Press.
Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability and Society, 12(3), 325–340.
Kanter, A. (2003). The globalization of disability rights law. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 30(2), 241–269.
Kaufman, C. (2003). Ideas for action: Relevant theory for radical change. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Neath, J., & Schriner, K. (1998). Power to people with disabilities: Empowerment issues in employment programming. Disability & Society, 13(2), 217–228.
Oliver, M. (1993). Re-defining disability: A challenge to research. In J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disabling barriers—enabling environments (pp. 61–68). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (1993). Discrimination, disability and welfare: From needs to rights. In J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disabling barriers- enabling environments (pp. 267–277). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rioux, M. (1997). Disability: The place of judgment in a world of fact. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41(2), 102–111.
Rioux, M. (2003). On second thought: Constructing knowledge, law, disability, and inequality. In S. Herr, L. Gostin, & H. Koh (Eds.), The human rights of persons with intellectual disabilities: Different but equal (pp. 287–317). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
Rioux, M., & Frazee, C. (1999). The Canadian framework for disability equality rights. In M. Jones & L. A. Basser (Eds.), Disability, divers-ability and legal change (pp. 171–182). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Rioux, M., & Prince, M. (2002). The Canadian political landscape of disability: Policy perspectives, social status, interest groups and the rights movement. In A. Puttee (Ed.), Federalism, democracy and disability policy in Canada (pp. 1–10). Montreal & Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Williams, G. (2001). Theorizing disability. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 123–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gillies, J. (2014). Critical Disability Theory. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_619
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_619
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law