Skip to main content

Children’s Social and Emotional Relationships and Well-Being: From the Perspective of the Child

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Child Well-Being

Abstract

This chapter opens with a review of current conceptualizations of child well-being and a good childhood. It moves on to consider the origins and driving forces influencing the development of the field of child indicators. The incorporation of children’s subjective perspectives in measuring and monitoring their well-being is highlighted along with the concomitant challenges posed by this welcome development.

Recent evidence from a quantitative survey which consulted children found three key determinants of child well-being. Their relationships with family and positive relationships with friends were positive influences while peer bullying negatively affected their well-being. Bearing these findings in mind, a body of qualitative research findings where children were central informants was selected for an in-depth examination of how these three key areas impacted upon their well-being. The studies included children in the general population, children living in different family types, children with special needs, children living in families experiencing difficulties, as well as children living in out-of-home care.

Throughout the qualitative studies, there was clear evidence of the importance of relationships with family and friends. Children’s close relationships with both were characterized by a sense of trust. Shared activities were the vehicles for developing trust and learning about negotiation with others. Where children lived in different family types, the quality of their relationships rather than the structure was the critical factor. Acceptance and having close relationships with family and friends were equally important to children with special needs. Children living in families experiencing difficulties often had to balance feelings of loyalty to their parents with feeling unsafe and insecure at times. Developing and maintaining friendships was particularly challenging for these children. We gained a glimpse of the dilemmas these children face which should inform the development of support strategies. Finally, children in out-of-home care highlighted the importance of being able to develop trust in their social workers and carers and the impact of multiple moves of home and school on these developing relationships. Bullying and the fear of bullying was highlighted by the children in all of these circumstances as a constant preoccupation in their daily lives. One of the key messages from these studies was just how prevalent this issue is and how much of children’s energies are focused on preventing or combating it. Apart from seeking the support of parents, the development of strong friendships was viewed as the most successful strategy. On a more general note, children’s agency in their relationships and in keeping safe was clearly evident. It is argued that studies which place children’s perspectives at the center have an important part to play in informing policy development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 3,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldersen, P. (2008). Children as researchers: Participation rights and research methods. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldgate, J. (2010). Child well-being, child development and family life. In C. McAuley & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being–understandingchildren’s lives. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldgate, J., & Jones, D. P. H. (2006). The place of attachment in children’s development. In J. Aldgate, D. P. H. Jones, W. Rose, & C. Jeffery (Eds.), The developing world of the child. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J., & Becker, S. (2003). Children who care for parents with mental illness: The perspectives of young carers, parents and professionals. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, S., Hurrelmann, K., & Schneekloth, U. (2012). Freedom and care: Theoretical and empirical aspects of children’s well-being in Germany. Child Indicators Research, 5(3), 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2005). Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. Social Indicators, 74(3), 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: Past, present and future. Child Indicators Research, 1, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2010). Developing indicators for child well-being in a changing context. In C. McAuley & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby, A., & Becker, S. (Eds.). (2000). Young carers in their own words. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, l., Cromby, J., Hook, D., Papadopoulos, D., & Walkerdine, V. (2008). Creating subjectivities. Editorial. Subjectivity, 22, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. (1990). Child poverty and deprivation in the UK. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Rees, G., Keung, A., & Goswami, H. (2010). The subjective well-being of children. In C. McAuley & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, J., Heptinstall, E., & Bhopal, K. (2000). Connecting children: Care and family life in later childhood. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiment by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Theoretical models of human development 6th ed., Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, R., Little, M., & Millham, S. (2001). Children’s return from state care to school. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Nobody ever told us school mattered: Raising the educational attainments of children in care. London: BAAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F. (2011). Subjective social indicators and child and adolescent well-being. Child Indicators, 4, 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P., & James, A. (Eds.). (2009). Conducting research with children. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, H. (2000). Fostering family contact. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, H., Unell, I., & Aldgate, J. (2012). Children’s needs – parenting capacity. Child abuse: Parental mental illness, learning disability, substance misuse and domestic violence. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors, C., & Stalker, K. (2003). The views and experiences of disabled children and their siblings: A positive outlook. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors, C., & Stalker, K. (2007). Children’s experiences of disability: Pointers to a social model of childhood disability. Disability and Society, 22(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Counterpoint. (2008). Childhood wellbeing: Qualitative research study. London: DCSF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (2004). Children’s friendships: The beginnings of intimacy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhaut, G., & Whiting, R. (2008). What do we mean by ‘wellbeing’? And why might it matter? Research Report DCSF-RW073. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2007). Children’s conceptualisation(s) of their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 80, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2009). When children are asked about their well-being: Towards a framework for guiding policy. Child Indicators Research, 2, 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2012). Locating the child centrally as subject in research: Towards a child interpretation of well-being. Child Indicators Research, 5(3), 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. (1995). Couldn’t care more: A study of young carers and their needs. London: The Children’s Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorin, S. (2004). Understanding what children say: Children’s experiences of domestic violence, parental substance misuse and parental health problems. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, H. (2011). Social relationships and children’s subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 3, 575–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, S. (2006). Child psychology: Taking account of children at last? Irish Journal of Psychology, 27, 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C. (1999). Attachment relationships in the context of multiple carers. In U. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook on attachment – theory, research and clinical applications. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. (2001). The education of children in care. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Nobody ever told us school mattered: Raising the educational attainments of children in care. London: BAAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., Jencks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorising childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellett, M. (2010). Empowering children and young people as researchers: Overcoming barriers and building capacity. Child Indicators Research, 4, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellett, M. (2011). Rethinking children and research: Attitudes in contemporary society. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Y. K. (2010). The impact of fathers’ work and family conflicts on children’s self-esteem: The Hong Kong case. Social Indicators Research, 95, 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., & Dunn, J. (2009). A good childhood. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobstein, T., & Frelut, M. L. (2003). Prevalence of overweight among children in Europe. Obesity Reviews, 4, 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Hood, S. (2011). Exploring issues of children as actors in social research. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 490–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (2002). Towards a sociology for childhood: Thinking from children’s lives. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, C. (1996a). Children in long-term foster care: Emotional and social development. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, C. (1996b). Children’s perspectives on long-term foster care. In M. Hill & J. Aldgate (Eds.), Child welfare services: Developments in law, policy, practice and research. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, C. (2005). Pathways and outcomes: A ten year follow-up study of children who have experienced care. Belfast: DHSSPSNI.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, C. (2006). Outcomes of long-term foster care: Young people’s views. In D. Iwaniec (Ed.), The child’s journey through care: Placement stability, care planning and achieving permanency. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, C. (2012). International advances in child well-being: Measuring and monitoring subjective well-being. Editorial. Child Indicators Research, 5(3), 419–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, C., & Davis, T. (2009). Emotional well-being and mental health of looked after children in England. In C. McAuley, P. Pecora, & J. Whittaker (Eds.), High risk youth: Evidence on characteristics, needs and promising interventions. Child and Family Social Work, Special Issue, 14(2), 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, C., & Rose, W. (2010a). Child well-being: Current issues and future directions. In C. McAuley & W. Ros (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, C., & Rose, W. (Eds.). (2010b). Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, C., McKeown, C., & Merriman, B. (2012). Spending time with family and friends: Children’s views on relationships and shared activities. Child Indicators Research, 5(3), 449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, H., Corbin, T., Gatward, R., Goodman, R., & Ford, T. (2003). The mental health of young people looked after by local authorities in England. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2005). Younger children’s views on every child matters. London: Children’s Rights Director, Commission for Social Care Inspection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2006a). On being a carer. London: Children’s Rights Director, Commission for Social Care Inspection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2006b). About social workers. London: Children’s Rights Director, Commission for Social Care Inspection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2006c). Placements, decisions and reviews. London: Children’s Rights Director, Commission for Social Care Inspection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2008). Children on bullying. London: Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2009a). Care and prejudice. London: Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2009b). Keeping in touch. London: Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2009c). Children’s care monitor 2009. London: Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2009d). Life in secure care. London: Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2009e). Life in children’s homes. London: Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2009f). Life in residential special schools. London: Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2010). Children on rights and responsibilities. London: Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullender, A., Hague, G., Imam, U., Kelly, L., Malos, E., & Regan, L. (2002). Children’s perspectives on domestic violence. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, B., & Becker, S. (1996). Young carers in Southwark: The hidden face of community care. Loughborough: Loughborough University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E., & Lee, P. L. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, G. (2010). Foreword. In C. McAuley & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinton, D., Rushton, A., Dance, C., & Mayes, D. (1997). Contact between children placed away from home and their birth parents: Research issues and evidence. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2(3), 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvorturp, J., Bardy, M., Sgritta, G., & Winterberger, H. (Eds.). (1994). Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeters, A. (2011). Cross-national differences in the association between parental work hours and time with children in Europe: A multilevel analysis. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9949-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. (2012). “They are there for you”. The importance of neighbourhood friends to children’s well-being. Child Indicators Research, 5(3), 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J., & Lambert, L. (1973). Children who wait. London: BAAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. (1998). Remember my messages: The experiences and views of 2,000 children in public care. London: Who Cares Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, I. (2005). Fostering now: Messages from research. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, I., Wilson, K., & Gibbs, I. (2005). Foster placements: Why they succeed and why they fail. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skuse, T., & Ward, H. (2003). Outcomes for looked after children: Children’s views of care and accommodation. Interim report. London: Department of Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilsbury, J., Korbin, J., & Coulton, C. (2012). “Subjective” and “objective” views of neighbourhood danger and well-being: The importance of multiple perspectives and mixed methods. Child Indicators Research, 5(3), 469–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, K., & Connors, C. (2004). Children’s perceptions of their disabled siblings: She’s different but it’s normal for us. Children and Society, 18, 218–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti Report Card 7. Florence: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2011). Childrens well-being in UK, Sweden and Spain: The role of inequality and materialism. Florence; UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1989). UN convention on the rights of the child.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In L. Vygotsky (Ed.), Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M., & Faulkner, D. M. (2008). Subjects, objects or participants: Dilemmas of psychological research with children. In A. James & P. Christensen (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colette McAuley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

McAuley, C., Rose, W. (2014). Children’s Social and Emotional Relationships and Well-Being: From the Perspective of the Child. In: Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., Korbin, J. (eds) Handbook of Child Well-Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_162

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_162

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9062-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9063-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics