Skip to main content

Mental Attention, Multiplicative Structures, and the Causal Problems of Cognitive Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Developmental Relations among Mind, Brain and Education

Abstract

We illustrate, theoretically and empirically, the dialectical relationship between learning and development. We do so in the context of children’s understanding of multiplication concepts. We briefly summarize the Theory of Constructive Operators and examine an important correspondence between the theory’s stages of growth in mental-attentional (M-) capacity and Case’s staircase model of development. We present task analyses of concepts underlying various kinds of multiplication word problems. These analyses lead to predictions about the mental (M-) demand of understanding multiplication concepts. There is a predicted trade-off between a child’s M-capacity and a task’s M-demand, such that a child should not be able to pass a task if its M-demand exceeds the child’s M-capacity. We test this prediction in a study in which children received training in the target multiplication concepts. Results show that children benefit from brief training only when their M-capacity is at least equal to the M-demand of the concept in question. To conclude, we briefly relate our theory to the developing brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Notice that in addition to the complexity of conservation of substance, conservation of weight requires an understanding of the balance scale’s functioning; and conservation of volume requires an understanding that “heavy” solids sink into water and that concurrently the water rises forced by the object as it sinks.

  2. 2.

    The words in square brackets were omitted by error from the printed version of the article.

  3. 3.

    Footnote in the original 1987 paper: “Dynamic/creative syntheses are the little understood processes that enable the organism to produce truly-novel, behavioral or mental, performances that were never learned, are not computationally implied by the combinatorial possibilities of the repertoire, nor are, properly speaking, innate or prewired.”

  4. 4.

    According to Edelman (1987) this lateral inhibition, i.e., activity by local inhibitory neurons that sharpen and segregate dynamic responses of the more highly activated neurons against other competing activated neurons, takes place in layer 4 of the neocortex. Edelman (1987, pp. 163–173) offers a model of how this happens.

References

  • Agostino, A. (2002). Solving multiplication problems: The role of mental attention. Unpublished masters thesis, York University, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anghileri, A. (1989). An investigation of young children’s understanding of multiplication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 367–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib, M. A., Érdi, P., &Szentágothai, J. (1998). Neural organization: Structure, function, and dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsalidou, M. (2003). Neural correlates of visual problem solving and complexity. Unpublished master’s thesis, York University, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, M. H., Donley, R. D., Halas, M. A., & Vakali, M. (1992). Working memory, automaticity, and problem difficulty. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 301–329). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2000). Development of working memory: Should the Pascual-Leone and the Baddeley and Hitch models be merged? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 128–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N. (1961). Physique atomique et connaissance humaine. Paris: Editions Gouthier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2002). Children’s understanding of mathematics. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 412–439). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1992). The mind’s staircase. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1995). Capacity-based explanations of working memory growth: A brief history and reevaluation. In F. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development (pp. 23–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1996) Summary and conclusion. In R. Case & Y. Okamoto, The role of conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought (pp. 189–214). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61 (Serial No. 246).

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1998). The development of conceptual structures. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed., pp. 745–800). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R., & Okamoto, Y. (1996). The role of conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61 (Serial No. 246).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2005). Working-memory capacity. New York: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico, A., & Guarnera, M. (2005). Exploring working memory in children with low arithmetical achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetriou, A., Christou, C., Spanoudis, G., & Platsidou, M. (2002). The development of mental processing: Efficiency, working memory, and thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67 (Serial No. 268).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Ribaupierre, A., & Bayeux, C. (1994). Developmental change in a spatial task of attentional capacity: An essay toward an integration of two working memory models. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 5–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. C. (1980). The human psyche, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). A universe of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (1998). Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 467–561). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. J. (1995). Societies of brains. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., & Widaman, K. F. (1992). Numerical cognition: On the convergence of componential and psychometric models. Intelligence, 16, 47–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S. A. (1994). Working memory capacity and the acquisition of mathematical knowledge: Implications for learning and development. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S. A., & Case, R. (1996). Evaluating the breadth and depth of training effects when central conceptual structures are taught. In R. Case & Y. Okamoto, The role of conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought (pp. 83–102). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61 (Serial No. 246).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S., Case, R., & Capodilupo, A. (1995). Teaching for understanding: The importance of the central conceptual structures in the elementary mathematics curriculum. In A. McKeough, J. Lupart, & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 123–151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halford, G. S. (1993). Children’s understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitz, R. P., Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity, attention control, and fluid intelligence. In O. Wilhelm & R. W. Engle (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 61–77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. McV. (1961). Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1966). Psychology: The briefer course (G. Allport, Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., Fabian, V., & Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). Quantitative hardware-stages that constrain language development. Human Development, 32, 245–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautrey, J. (2002). Is there a general factor of cognitive development? In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 117–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeFevre, J., DeStefano, D., Coleman, B., & Shanahan, T. (2005). Mathematical cognition and working memory. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 361–377). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire, P., Abdi, H., & Fayol, M. (1996). The role of working memory resources in simple cognitive arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 73–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabbott, D. J., & Bisanz, J. (2003). Developmental change and individual differences in children’s multiplication. Child Development, 74, 1091–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., Engles, F., & Lenin, V. I. (1977). On dialectical materialism. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, J. F., & Hitch, G. J. (1999). Working memory impairments in children with specific arithmetic learning difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 240–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounoud, P. (1986). Similarities between developmental sequences at different age periods. In I. Levin (Ed.), Stage and structure: Reopening the debate (pp. 119–131). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morra, S. (2000). A new model of verbal short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 191–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesher, P. (1988). Multiplicative school word problems: Theoretical approaches and empirical findings. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle school grades (pp. 19–40). Reston, VA: NCIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesher, P. (1992). Solving multiplication word problems. In G. Lienhardt, R. T. Putnam, & R. A. Hattrup (Eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 189–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orozco, H. M. (1996). Analisis microgenetico y procesual de la construccion de la operacion multiplicativa. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1969). Cognitive development and cognitive style: A general psychological integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget’s developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 63, 301–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1976). On learning and development, Piagetian style: I. A reply to Lefebvre- Pinard. Canadian Psychological Review, 17, 270–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1980). Constructive problems for constructive theories: The current relevance of Piaget’s work and a critique of information-processing simulation psychology. In R. Kluwe & H. Spada (Eds.), Developmental models of thinking (pp. 263–296). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1987). Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectical causal account of cognitive development. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 531–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin’s field-dependence-independence. In T. Globerson & T. Zelniker (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 36–70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1991). A commentary on Boom and Juckes’ on the learning paradox. Human Development, 34, 288–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1995). Learning and development as dialectical factors in cognitive growth. Human Development, 38, 338–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1996). Vygotsky, Piaget, and the problems of Plato. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55, 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1998) SSSs or functionalist modes of processing? A commentary on Kargopoulos and Demetriou’s paper. New Ideas in Psychology, 16, 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (2000). Reflections on working memory: Are the two models complementary? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (2001). If the magical number is 4, how does one account for operations within working memory? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., & Baillargeon, R. (1994). Developmental measure of mental attention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 161–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., & Goodman, D. (1979). Intelligence and experience: A neoPiagetian approach. Instructional Science, 8, 301–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., & Ijaz, H. (1989). Mental capacity testing as a form of intellectual-developmental assessment. In R. Samuda, S. Kong, J. Cummings, J. Pascual-Leone, & J. Lewis (Eds.), Assessment and placement of minority students (pp. 144–171). Toronto: Hogrefe International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., & Irwin, R. (1998). Abstraction, the will, the self, and models of learning in adulthood. In M. C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 35–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (1991). The psychological unit and its role in task analysis: A reinterpretation of object permanence. In M. Chandler & M. Chapman (Eds.), Criteria for competence (pp. 155–187). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (1999). A dialectical constructivist view of representation: Role of mental attention, executives, and symbols. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Development of mental representation: Theories and applications (pp. 169–200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2001). Manual for FIT: Figural Intersections Test. Unpublished manuscript, York University, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2005). A dialectical constructivist view of developmental intelligence. In O. Wilhelm & R. W. Engle (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 177–201). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., Baskind, S., Dworsky, S., & Severtson, E. (2000). Culture-fair assessment and the processes of mental attention. In A. Kozulin & Y. Rand (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein’s theory in education and psychology (pp. 191–214). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., Bauer, S., & Agostino, A. (2002). How much does arithmetic proficiency in the school years owe to mental attentional capacity? Poster presented at the meetings of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J., & Smith, J. (1969). The encoding and decoding of symbols by children: A new experimental paradigm and a neo-Piagetian model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 328–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passolunghi, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Short-term memory, working memory, and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passolunghi, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (2004). Working memory and access to numerical information in children with disability in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 348–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1980). Adaptation and intelligence: Organic selection and phenocopy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & W. Kessen (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. History, theory, and methods (4th ed., pp. 103–128). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). The child’s construction of quantities: Conservation and atomism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (1988). Intensive quantity and referent transforming arithmetic operations. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 41–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, K., & Schumann-Hengsteler, R. (2000). Mental multiplication and working memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 552–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severtson, E. (1993). Development of multiplicative reasoning. Unpublished masters thesis, York University, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. London: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Sachs-Lee, C. (2001). Mathematical problem solving and working memory in children with learning disabilities: Both executive and phonological processes are important. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 294–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, R. W. (1997). Human frontal lobe development: A theory of cyclical cortical reorganization. In N. A. Krasnegor, G. R. Lyon, & P. S. Goldman-Rakic (Eds.), Development of prefrontal cortex (pp. 85–113). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C., & Brunswik, E. (1935). The organism and the causal texture of the environment. Psychological Review, 42, 43–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 127–174). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Research agenda for mathematics education: Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 141–161). Reston, VA: NCIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuyk, R. (1981). Overview and critique of Piaget’s genetic epistemology 1965–1980 (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Preparation of this chapter was facilitated by an operating grant (#410-2001-1077) to the first two authors from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). The reported research was funded by a SSHRC operating grant (#410-2006-2325) and a York University Faculty of Arts Research Grant. We are grateful to the following for assistance with data collection: S. Bauer, S. Cunning, D. Fisher, N. Im-Bolter, L. Hakim, and E. Polak.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Pascual-Leone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., Agostino, A. (2010). Mental Attention, Multiplicative Structures, and the Causal Problems of Cognitive Development. In: Ferrari, M., Vuletic, L. (eds) The Developmental Relations among Mind, Brain and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3666-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics