Skip to main content

Controversy: Volume Load vs. Vasopressor

  • Chapter
  • 952 Accesses

Abstract

Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) can cause hypotension during anesthetic management, particularly because of displacement of the heart. While hypotension is mainly treated with fluid volume loading and vasopressors, few studies have investigated which is the more effective of the two treatments. Methods based on volume loading are logical because they aim to replenish the decreased ventricular preload, which is the main cause of the decrease in blood pressure. These methods avoid the damage caused by hypovolemia and the side effects caused by vasopressors, such as increased circulatory dysfunction. In contrast, methods using vasopressors are consistent with recent trends in fluid restriction, which aim to avoid complications caused by fluid overload while also maintaining organ perfusion. Anesthesiologists must have a thorough knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of each method and employ one or both in accordance with each patient’s needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guyton RA, McClenathan JH, Newman GE, Michaelis LL (1977) Significance of subendocardial S-T segment elevation caused by coronary stenosis in the dog. Epicardial S-T segment depression, local ischemia and subsequent necrosis. Am J Cardiol 40(3):373–380. doi:0002-9149(77)90159-X [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alkire MT (1998) Quantitative EEG correlations with brain glucose metabolic rate during anesthesia in volunteers. Anesthesiology 89(2):323–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Virmani S, Tempe DK (2007) Anaesthesia for off-pump coronary artery surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 10(1):65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Urso S, Sadaba JR, Pettinari M (2012) Impact of off-pump to on-pump conversion rate on post-operative results in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 14:188–193

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Couture P, Denault A, Limoges P, Sheridan P, Babin D, Cartier R (2002) Mechanisms of hemodynamic changes during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Can J Anaesth 49(8):835–849. doi:10.1007/BF03017418 [doi]

  6. Chassot PG, van der Linden P, Zaugg M, Mueller XM, Spahn DR (2004) Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: physiology and anaesthetic management. Br J Anaesth 92(3):400–413. doi:10.1093/bja/aeh064 [doi] 92/3/400 [pii]

  7. Bojar RM (ed) (2005) Manual of perioperative care in adult cardiac surgery, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heames RM, Gill RS, Ohri SK, Hett DA (2002) Off-pump coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 57(7):676–685. doi:2613 [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hemmerling TM, Romano G, Terrasini N, Noiseux N (2013) Anesthesia for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 16(1):28–39. doi:AnnCardAnaesth_2013_16_1_28_105367 [pii] 10.4103/0971-9784.105367 [doi]

  10. Grundeman PF, Borst C, van Herwaarden JA, Verlaan CW, Jansen EW (1998) Vertical displacement of the beating heart by the octopus tissue stabilizer: influence on coronary flow. Ann Thorac Surg 65 (5):1348–1352. doi:S0003497598002264 [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A (2005) Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 128(2):848–854. doi:128/2/848 [pii] 10.1378/chest.128.2.848 [doi]

  12. Lee JH, Jeon Y, Bahk JH, Gil NS, Kim KB, Hong DM, Kim HJ (2011) Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 25(6):1056–1062. doi:S1053-0770(11)00532-5 [pii] 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.07.013 [doi]

  13. Mueller XM, Chassot PG, Zhou J, Eisa KM, Chappuis C, Tevaearai HT, von Segesser LK (2002) Hemodynamics optimization during off-pump coronary artery bypass: the ‘no compression’ technique. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22(2):249–254. doi:S1010794002002701 [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  14. Staton GW, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, Hu J, Chu H, Duke PG, Puskas JD (2005) Pulmonary outcomes of off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in a randomized trial. Chest 127(3):892–901. doi:127/3/892 [pii] 10.1378/chest.127.3.892 [doi]

  15. Yoshida M, Seo K, Miyawaki H, Muranaka K, Kakumoto S, Mizutani H, Itaya M, Nitta K (2001) Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients receiving hemodialysis. Cardiovasc Anesth 5(1):87–93

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kessler P, Aybek T, Neidhart G, Dogan S, Lischke V, Bremerich DH, Byhahn C (2005) Comparison of three anesthetic techniques for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: general anesthesia, combined general and high thoracic epidural anesthesia, or high thoracic epidural anesthesia alone. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 19(1):32–39. doi:S1053077004002770 [pii] 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.11.006 [doi]

  17. Grocott MP, Mythen MG, Gan TJ (2005) Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults. Anesth Analg 100 (4):1093–1106. doi:100/4/1093 [pii] 10.1213/01.ANE.0000148691.33690.AC [doi]

  18. Mythen MG (2005) Postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction. Anesth Analg 100(1):196–204. doi:100/1/196 [pii] 10.1213/01.ANE.0000139376.45591.17 [doi]

  19. Groudine SB, Hollinger I, Jones J, DeBouno BA, The Phenylephrine Advisory Committee (2000) New York state guidelines on the topical use of phenylephrine in the operating room. Anesthesiology 92(3):859–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Omae T, Kakihana Y, Mastunaga A, Tsuneyoshi I, Kawasaki K, Kanmura Y, Sakata R (2005) Hemodynamic changes during off-pump coronary artery bypass anastomosis in patients with coexisting mitral regurgitation: improvement with milrinone. Anesth Analg 101(1):2–8, table of contents. doi:101/1/2 [pii] 10.1213/01.ANE.0000155262.37491.6A [doi]

  21. Antonopoulos A, Nikolopoulos D, Georgiou EK, Kyriakidis M, Proukakis C (2002) Blood pressure elevation after phenylephrine infusion may adversely affect myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 84(2–3):201–209. doi:S0167527302001468 [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hanada T, Obo H, Morimoto N, Matsuhisa H, Maruo A, Minami H, Nakagiri K, Yoshida M, Mukohara N, Shida T (2004) Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia after Off-Pump CABG. Jpn J Cardiovasc Surg 33(2):94–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Katz MG, Schachner A, Ezri T, Kravtsov V, Freidman V, Hauptman E, Sasson L (2006) Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a word of caution. Am Surg 72(3):228–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shires T, Williams J, Brown F (1961) Acute change in extracellular fluids associated with major surgical procedures. Ann Surg 154:803–810

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Joshi GP (2005) Intraoperative fluid restriction improves outcome after major elective gastrointestinal surgery. Anesth Analg 101(2):601–605. doi:101/2/601 [pii] 10.1213/01.ANE.0000159171.26521.31 [doi]

  26. Marjanovic G, Villain C, Juettner E, zur Hausen A, Hoeppner J, Hopt UT, Drognitz O, Obermaier R (2009) Impact of different crystalloid volume regimes on intestinal anastomotic stability. Ann Surg 249(2):181–185. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818b73dc [doi] 00000658-200902000-00001 [pii]

  27. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, Nygren J, Hausel J, Soop M, Andersen J, Kehlet H (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24(3):466–477. doi:S0261-5614(05)00023-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002 [doi]

  28. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen PE, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F (2003) Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238(5):641–648. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23 [doi]

  29. Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I (2005) Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 103(1):25–32. doi:00000542-200507000-00008 [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  30. Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, Hluchy M, Kasal E, Svitak R, Pradl R, Stepan M (2010) Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care 14(3):R118. doi:cc9070 [pii] 10.1186/cc9070 [doi]

  31. Forget P, Lois F, de Kock M (2010) Goal-directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter-derived pleth variability index reduces lactate levels and improves fluid management. Anesth Analg 111(4):910–914. doi:ANE.0b013e3181eb624f [pii] 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eb624f [doi]

  32. Gelman S, Mushlin PS (2004) Catecholamine-induced changes in the splanchnic circulation affecting systemic hemodynamics. Anesthesiology 100(2):434–439. doi:00000542-200402000-00036 [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sun D, Huang A, Mital S, Kichuk MR, Marboe CC, Addonizio LJ, Michler RE, Koller A, Hintze TH, Kaley G (2002) Norepinephrine elicits beta2-receptor-mediated dilation of isolated human coronary arterioles. Circulation 106(5):550–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kurosawa H, Seto Y, Wakamatsu H, Sato Y, Takase S, Omata S, Yokoyama H (2013) Effects of phenylephrine and noradrenaline on coronary artery motion in an open-chest porcine beating heart model. Surg Today. doi:10.1007/s00595-013-0639-9 [doi]

  35. Matsuura K, Imamaki M, Ishida A, Shimura H, Fujita H, Niitsuma Y, Miyazaki M (2008) Low systemic vascular resistance state following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 14(1):15–21. doi:atcs/2008_14_1/15 [pii]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinju Obara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Obara, S., Murakawa, M. (2016). Controversy: Volume Load vs. Vasopressor. In: Asai, T., Ochi, M., Yokoyama, H. (eds) Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54986-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54986-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54985-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54986-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics