Skip to main content

The Flow of Information Through People’s Network and Its Effect on Japanese Public Pension System

  • Conference paper
Agent-Based Approaches in Economic and Social Complex Systems VI

Part of the book series: Agent-Based Social Systems ((ABSS,volume 8))

  • 851 Accesses

Abstract

In this article, we would like to verify a positive or negative policy impact that comes from decreasing or increasing people’s distrust in Japanese public pension system. For the sake of tackling these issues, firstly, we pick up some network models that fit well in real people’s network. Secondly, we put the information, which is concerning about Japanese public pension system, on agent-to-agent network. Finally, we ascertain the effect of releasing the information and its expansion on Japanese public pension system. Consequently, it is revealed that releasing information over again have a profound effect on reducing distrust in public pension system and on pension premium fund. With releasing information to a limited extent and to a limited number of agents, there is limited effect on reducing agent’s distrust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In our model, we define one simulation step as 1 month.

  2. 2.

    See [8], p. 509.

  3. 3.

    Refer to [9] about TRM.

  4. 4.

    In general, the number of agents in many other models is fixed or not decreased.

  5. 5.

    In this article, we define agent’s attitude score as the degree of trust in public pension system. If an agent’s attitude score is negative, we identify the agent has distrust in public pension system. If it is positive, we identify the agent does not have distrust in public pension system.

  6. 6.

    For example, in 2009, the amount of pension benefit received each people aged over 65 in each month is defined as follows: 792,000 yen (full benefit amount) ×{(premium paid period) + (period of half exemption from premium) \(\times 2/3+\) (period of total exemption from premium) \(\times 1/3\}/40\) (the maximum participation year) ×12.

  7. 7.

    For more detail on Japanese public pension system, see [10]. As described before, in our model, we defined one step as 1 month. So, agents get older every 12 steps. And they have life duration based on abridged life table. In Japan, the abridged life table is released at fixed intervals by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. In addition, we set the start year of simulation at 2004.

References

  1. Murakami M, Tanida N How will the difference in people’s network structure have impact on Japanese public pension system? In: 15th International conference on computing in economics and finance. http://editorialexpress.com/conference/CEF2009/program/CEF2009.html

  2. Latané B, Morio H (2000) Maintaining diversity: simulating the role of nonlinearity and discreteness in dynamic social impact. In: Suleiman R, Troitzsch KG, Gilbert N (eds) Tools and technique for social science simulation, pp 196–217. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Latané B (1981) The psychology of social impact. Am Psychol 36:343–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asch SE (1951) Effect of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In: Guetzknow H (eds) Groups, leadership and men, pp 1–43. Carnegie, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abelson RP (1964) Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy. In: Frederiksen N, Gulliksen H (eds) Contributions to mathematical psychology, pp 147–160. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morio H (2003) Multi-agent DSIT simulation: reexamination of robustness of prediction. Simulation & Gaming 13(2):159–168 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Latané B, Nowak A (1997) Self-organizing social systems: necessary and sufficient conditions for the emergence of consolidation, clustering, and continuing diversity. In: Barnett G, Boster F (eds) Progress in communication science persuasion, vol 13, pp 43–74. Ablex, Norwood, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barabasi A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling random network. Science 286:509–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Konno N, Machida T (2008) How-nual Visual Guide Book Yokuwakaru Fukuzatsu Network. Shuwa System Co., Ltd (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Social Insurance Agency. http://www.sia.go.jp/e/np.html

Download references

Acknowledgement

We appreciate KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc. for providing Multi Agent Simulator (named “artisoc 1.0”). First author is partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B), MEXT (No. 21730179).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masatoshi Murakami .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Murakami, M., Tanida, N. (2011). The Flow of Information Through People’s Network and Its Effect on Japanese Public Pension System. In: Chen, SH., Terano, T., Yamamoto, R. (eds) Agent-Based Approaches in Economic and Social Complex Systems VI. Agent-Based Social Systems, vol 8. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53907-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics