Skip to main content

Functional Stereotactic Neurosurgery for Psychiatric Disorders: an Experience in Belgium and The Netherlands

  • Chapter
Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery

Abstract

This chapter addresses the difficult and often contentious subject of psychosurgery which has been defined as “a neurosurgical intervention to sever fibres connecting one part of the brain with another, or to remove or destroy brain tissue with the intent of modifying or altering severe disturbance of behaviour, thought content or mood”. The authors have traced the historical development of psychosurgery and brought out the fact that it is those patients suffering from anxiety, depression and obsessive compulsive illness who throughout this history of psychosurgery have benefited most. They also refer to the “taming effects” of the old leucotomy (obsolete since the mid-1950’s) which had proved useful in the management of certain behaviour disorders of schizophrenia. This latter effect often left patients with severe blunting of personality, but the operation, judged in the context of the alternatives available at the time was better than nothing for this unfortunate group. It allowed 20% to return to life in the community. However, as the authors emphasize this became history with the discovery in the 1950’s of the major tranquilizers and effective pharmacological agents for the treatment of depression and anxiety which has transformed psychiatry. Nonetheless, some patients remain resistant to the newer treatments and it is this which keeps an interest in psychosurgery alive. The introduction of stereo-tactic techniques, increasingly accurate imaging techniques for target identification and precise lesions have all contributed to a very low morbidity of modern procedures. It is now well recognised that Psychiatrists and Neurosurgeons must work in close partnership to ensure the cases are appropriately selected.

We are pleased to publish the following commentary by Mr. John Bartlett of the Brook Hospital, London, who has Britain’s greatest experience in the management of such cases. The Editors

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. APA (1989) American psychiatric glossary. In: Stone EM (ed) American Psychiatric Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ballantine HT Jr, Cassidy WL, Flanagan NB, Marino R (1967) Stereotactic anterior cingulotomy for neuropsychiatric illness and intractable pain. J Neurosurg 26: 488–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballantine HT, Levy BS, Dagi TF (1977) Cingulotomy for psychiatric illness. Report of 13 years’ experience. In: Sweet WH, Obrador S, Martin-Rodriguez JG (eds) Neurosurgical treatment in psychiatry, pain and epilepsy. University Park Press, Baltimore, 333-353.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belgian Biomedical Ethical Committee (1991) Statement. National Fund for Scientific Research, Brussels, November.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bregging P (1980) Brain-Disabling therapies. In: Valenstein E (ed) The psychosurgery debate. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 467–492.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burzaco J (1981) Stereotactic surgery in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive neurosis. In: Perris C, Struwe G, Jansson B (eds) Biological psychiatry 1981. Proceedings of the Third World Congress on Biological Psychiatry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1103-1109.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crosby EC, Humphrey T (1944) Studies of the vertebrate telecephalon. III. The amygdaloid complex in the shrew (blarina brevicauda). J Comp Neurol 81: 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crow H (1977) The treatment of anxiety and obsessionality with chronically implanted electrodes. In: Smith JS, Kiloh LG (eds) Psychosurgery and society. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crow HJ, Cooper R, Philips DG (1961) Controlled multifocal frontal leucotomy for psychiatric illness. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 24: 353–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Culliton B (1976) Psychosurgery: National Commission issues surprisingly favorable report. Science 194: 299–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (1977) Protection of human subjects, use of psychosurgery in practice and research: report and recommendations for public comment. Federal Register, May 23, 26318-26332.

    Google Scholar 

  12. American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd rev Ed. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dutch Health Council (1990) Neurochirurgische behandeling van patiënten met zeer ernstige psychische aandoeningen. Gezondheidsraad, Publicatie 90/21, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman W, Watts JW (1950) Psychosurgery in the treatment of mental disorders and intractable pain, 2nd Ed. Thomas, Springfield, 111.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hassler R (1982) Stereotaxic surgery for psychiatric disturbances. In: Schaltenbrand, Walker (eds) Stereotaxy of the human brain. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 570–590.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hay P, Sachdev (1992) The present status of psychosurgery in Australia and New-Zealand. Med J Aust 157: 17–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Herner T (1961) Treatment of mental disorders with frontal stereotactic thermolesions. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand [Suppl 36].

    Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organisation (1992) ICD-10 Classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobson S, Trojanowski JQ (1975) Amygdaloid projections to prefrontal granular cortex in rhesus monkey demonstrated with horseradish peroxidase. Brain Res 100: 132–139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kelly D (1973) Psychosurgery and the limbic system. Postgrad Med J 49: 825–833.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Knight G (1964) The orbital cortex as an objective in the surgical treatment of mental illness. The results of 450 cases of open operation and the development of the stereotactic approach. Br J Surg 51(2): 114–124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Knight G (1965) Stereotactic tractotomy in the surgical treatment of mental illness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 28: 304–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Knight G (1972) Bifrontal stereotaxic tractotomy in the substantia innominata. An experience of 450 cases. In: Hitchcock E, Laitinen L, Vaernet K (eds) Psychosurgery. Thomas, Springfield, 111, pp 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Knight G (1973) Further observations from an experience of 660 cases of stereotactic tractotomy. Postgrad Med J 49: 845–854.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Leksell L, Larsson B, Andersson B, Rexed B, Sourander P, Mair W (1960) Lesions in the depth of the brain produced by a beam of high energy protons. Acta Radiol (Stockh) 54: 251–264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leksell L (1971) Stereotaxis and radiosurgery. An operative system. Thomas, Springfield, 111, pp 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Leksell L, Backlund E-O (1979) Stereotactic gamma capsulotomy. In: Hitchcock ER, Ballantine HR Jr, Meyerson BA (eds) Modern concepts in psychiatric surgery. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 213–216.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lichterman B (1992) On the history of psychosurgery in Russia. Personal written communication of 5 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lovett L, Shaw D (1987) Outcome in bipolar affective disorder after stereotactic tractotomy. Br J Psychiatry 151: 113–116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Marino R (1977) Stereotactic anatomy and vascularization of cingulate gyrus and adjacent areas. In: Sweet WH (ed) Obrador neurosurgical treatment of psychiatry pain and epilepsy. University Park Press, Congress 75, pp 321-332.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mark V, Ervin F (1970) Violence and the brain. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Maxwell-Jones (1968) Beyond the therapeutic community. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Merskey H (1991) Ethical aspects of the physical manipulation of the brain. In: Bloch S, Chodoff P (eds) Psychiatric ethics, 2nd Ed. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford, pp 185–214.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meyer A, Beck E, McLardy T (1947) Prefrontal leukotomy. A neuro-anatomical report. Brain 70: 18–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Meyer A, Beck E (1954) Prefrontal leucotomy and related operations. Anatomic aspects of success and failure. Churchill Livingstone, Thomas, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Meyerson BA (1977) Stereotactic anterior capsulotomy in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive neurosis. In: Carrea R (ed) Neurological surgery. International Congress Series No. 433. Exerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 307-312.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Meyerson BA, Bergström M, Greitz T (1979) Target localization with the aid of computed tomography. In: Hitchcock E, Ballantine HT Jr, Meyerson BA (eds) Modern concepts in psychiatric surgery. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Meyerson BA (1988) The role of anterior internal capsulotomy in psychiatric surgery. In: Lundsford LD (ed) Modern stereotactic neurosurgery. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, pp 353–364.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Mindus P (1991) Thesis: capsulotomy in anxiety disorders. A multidisciplinary study. Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Moniz E (1936) Tentatives opératoires dans le traitement de certaines psychoses. Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Narabayashi H, Shima F (1973) Which is the better amygdala target, the medial or lateral nuclei (For behaviour problems and paroxysm in epileptics). In: Laitinen LV, Livingston KE (eds) Surgical approaches in psychiatry. Medical and Technical Publishing Co, Lancaster, pp 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  42. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research (1977) Use of psychosurgery in practice and research: report and recommendation for public comment. Department of HEW, Federal Register May 23, 26318-26332.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Newcombe RL (1972) Landmarks for lesions in the substantia innominata. In: Hitchcock E, Laitinen L, Vaernet K (eds) Psychosurgery. Thomas, Springfield, 11, pp 289–290.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Newcombe RL (1973) Anatomical placement of lesions in the ventromedial segment of the frontal lobe. In: Laitinen LV, Livingston KE (eds) Surgical approaches in psychiatry. Medical and Technical Publishing Co, Lancaster, pp 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nys H (1988) Psychosurgery and personality-some legal considerations. In: Brihaye J, Calliauw L, Loew P, van den Bergh R (eds) Personality and neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) [Suppl] 44: 170-172.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schaltenbrand G, Wahren W (1977) Atlas for sterotaxy of the human brain. Thieme, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Scoville WB (1972) Psychosurgery and other lesions of the brain affecting human behaviour. In: Hitchcock E, Laitinen L, Vaernet K (eds) Psychosurgery. Thomas, Springfield, 111, pp 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Storm van Leeuwen W (1982) Neuro-physio-surgery in the Netherlands since 1971. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 61: 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Talairach J, Hecaen H, David M (1949) Lobotomie préfrontale limitée par électrocoagulation des fibres thalamofrontales à leur émergence du bras anterieur de la capsule interne. In: VI Congress Neurologique International. Masson, Paris, p 141.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Valenstein E (1980) The psychosurgery debate. Scientific, legal and ethical perspectives. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cosyns, P. et al. (1994). Functional Stereotactic Neurosurgery for Psychiatric Disorders: an Experience in Belgium and The Netherlands. In: Symon, L., et al. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, vol 21. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6648-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6648-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7369-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6648-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics