Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Axiomatizing Epistemic Logic of Friendship via Tree Sequent Calculus

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10455))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper positively solves an open problem if it is possible to provide a Hilbert system to Epistemic Logic of Friendship (EFL) by Seligman, Girard and Liu. To find a Hilbert system, we first introduce a sound, complete and cut-free tree (or nested) sequent calculus for EFL, which is an integrated combination of Seligman’s sequent calculus for basic hybrid logic and a tree sequent calculus for modal logic. Then we translate a tree sequent into an ordinary formula to specify a Hilbert system of EFL and finally show that our Hilbert system is sound and complete for an intended two-dimensional semantics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By (K)-rules and (Nec)-rules for \(\Box \), \(\mathsf {F}\) and \(@_{n}\), the replacement of equivalence holds in \(\mathsf {H}\mathbf {EFL}\).

  2. 2.

    Given a set \(\varGamma \cup \{{\varphi }\}\) of formulas, we say that \(\varphi \) is deducible in \(\mathsf {H}\mathbf {EFL}\) from \(\varGamma \) if there exist finite formulas \(\psi _{1}\), \(\ldots \), \(\psi _{n} \in \varGamma \) such that \((\psi _{1}\wedge \ldots \wedge \psi _{n}) \rightarrow \varphi \) is provable in \(\mathsf {H}\mathbf {EFL}\). Then it is easy to see that the deduction theorem holds in \(\mathsf {H}\mathbf {EFL}\).

  3. 3.

    We do not need to assume that each of our models is named in the sense that each agent is named by an agent nominal.

References

  1. Areces, C., ten Cate, B.: Hybrid logics. In: Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J., Wolter, F. (eds.) Handbook of Modal Logic, pp. 821–868. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baltag, A., Moss, L., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge and private suspicions. In: Proceedings of TARK, pp. 43–56. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackburn, P.: Arthur prior and hybrid logic. Synthese 150(3), 329–372 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Blackburn, P., ten Cate, B.: Pure extensions, proof rules, and hybrid axiomatics. Studia Logica 84(3), 277–322 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Blackburn, P., Tzakova, M.: Hybrid completeness. Logic J. IGPL 6(4), 625–650 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Braüner, T.: Hybrid Logic and Its Proof-Theory. Applied Logic Series, vol. 37. Springer, Dordrecht (2011). doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0002-4

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Brünnler, K.: Deep sequent systems for modal logic. Arch. Math. Logic 48, 551–577 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Christoff, Z., Hansen, J.U., Proetti, C.: Reflecting on social influence in networks. J. Logic Lang. Inf. 25(3), 299–333 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitting, M., Thalmann, L., Voronkov, A.: Term-modal logics. Studia Logica 69(1), 133–169 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gargov, G., Passy, S., Tinchev, T.: Modal environment for Boolean speculations (preliminary report). In: Skordev, D. (ed.) Mathematical Logic and its Applications. Proceedings of the Summer School and Conference dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of Kurt Gödel, pp. 253–263. Plenum Press, Druzhba (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Girard, P., Seligman, J., Liu, F.: General dynamic dynamic logic. In: Ghilardi, S., Bolander, T., Braüner, T., Moss, L.S. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logics, vol. 9, pp. 239–260. College Publications, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldblatt, R.: Axiomatising the Logic of Computer Programming. LNCS, vol. 130. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hintikka, J.: Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Cornell University Press, Cornell (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kashima, R.: Cut-free sequent calculi for some tense logics. Studia Logica 53, 119–135 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Negri, S.: Proof analysis in modal logic. J. Philos. Logic 34, 507–544 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Negri, S., Von Plato, J.: Structural Proof Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Negri, S., Von Plato, J.: Proof Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Plaza, J.A.: Logics of public communications. In: Emrich, M.L., Pfeifer, M.S., Hadzikadic, M., Ras, Z.W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp. 201–216 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sano, K.: Axiomatizing hybrid products: How can we reason many-dimensionally in hybrid logic? J. Appl. Logic 8(4), 459–474 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Seligman, J.: Internalization: the case of hybrid logics. J. Logic Comput. 11(5), 671–689 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Seligman, J., Liu, F., Girard, P.: Logic in the community. In: Banerjee, M., Seth, A. (eds.) ICLA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6521, pp. 178–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18026-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Seligman, J., Liu, F., Girard, P.: Facebook and the epistemic logic of friendship. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK 2013), Chennai, India, pp. 230–238, 7–9 January 2013

    Google Scholar 

  24. Seligman, J., Liu, F., Girard, P.: Knowledge, friendship and social announcement. In: van Benthem, J., Liu, F. (eds.) Logic Across the University: Foundations and Applications. Studies in Logic, vol. 47, pp. 445–469. College Publications, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of the manuscript and their many useful comments and suggestions. I presented the contents of this paper first at the 48th MLG meeting at Kaga, Ishikawa, Japan on 6th December 2013 and then at Kanazawa Workshop for Epistemic Logic and its Dynamic Extensions, Kanazawa, Japan on 22nd February 2014. I would like to thank Jeremy Seligman and Fenrong Liu for fruitful discussions of the topic. All errors, however, are mine. The work of the author was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) Grant Number 15K21025 and JSPS Core-to-Core Program (A. Advanced Research Networks).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Graduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

    Katsuhiko Sano

Authors
  1. Katsuhiko Sano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsuhiko Sano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands

    Alexandru Baltag

  2. Department of Philosophy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Jeremy Seligman

  3. Graduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University , Sapporo, Japan

    Tomoyuki Yamada

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sano, K. (2017). Axiomatizing Epistemic Logic of Friendship via Tree Sequent Calculus. In: Baltag, A., Seligman, J., Yamada, T. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10455. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55665-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55665-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55664-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55665-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships

Search

Navigation