Skip to main content

Compactness in Infinitary Gödel Logics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 582 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9803))

Abstract

We outline some model-building procedures for infinitary Gödel logics, including a suitable ultrapower construction. As an application, we provide two proofs of the fact that the usual characterizations of cardinals \(\kappa \) such that the Compactness and Weak Compactness Theorems hold for the infinitary language \(\mathcal {L}_{\kappa , \kappa }\) are also valid for the corresponding Gödel logics.

Partially supported by FWF grants P-26976-N25, I-1897-N25, I-2671-N35, and W1255-N23.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Recall that a (proper) filter \(U\ne \wp (X)\) on a set X is a collection of subsets of X that is closed under binary intersections and supersets.

  2. 2.

    As unfortunate as it is, ‘V’ is the usual notation for this.

References

  1. Baaz, M., Preining, N., Zach, R.: First-order Gödel logics. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 147, 23–47 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Yaacov, I.B., Berenstein, A., Henson, C.W., Usvyatsov, A.: Model theory for metric structures. In: Lecture Notes Series of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 350, pp. 315–427 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hanf, W.P.: On a problem of Erdös and Tarski. Fundamenta Mathematicae 53, 325–334 (1964)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Jech, T.: Set Theory. Springer, New York (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanamori, A.: The Higher Infinite. Springer, New York (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Keisler, H.J., Tarski, A.: From accessible to inaccessible cardinals. Fundamenta Mathematicae 53, 225–308 (1964)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott, D., Tarski, A.: The sentential calculus with infinitely long expressions. Colloquium Mathematicum 16, 166–170 (1958)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Tarski, A.: Remarks on predicate logic with infinitely long expressions. Colloquium Mathematicum 16, 171–176 (1958)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan P. Aguilera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aguilera, J.P. (2016). Compactness in Infinitary Gödel Logics. In: Väänänen, J., Hirvonen, Å., de Queiroz, R. (eds) Logic, Language, Information, and Computation. WoLLIC 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52921-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52921-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-52920-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-52921-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics