Skip to main content

Monetarisierungsstrategien für Mobilitätsplattformen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management digitaler Plattformen

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werden Monetarisierungsstrategien für Mobilitätsplattformen abgeleitet, die anhand mehrerer Dimensionen charakterisiert werden. Zu diesen Dimensionen gehören sowohl verschiedene direkte Gebühren als auch spezielle Strategien wie die Subvention oder Absorption. Mit den Erkenntnissen über den Einfluss der Dimensionen wird eine geeignete Monetarisierungsstrategie für eine Mobilitätsplattform geschaffen.

Das Forschungsprojekt ExCELL wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi) gefördert (Förderkennzeichen: 01MD15001D).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Armstrong M, Wright J (2007) Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Economic Theory 32 (2): S. 353-380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajarin B (2014) iOS, Android, and the Dividing of Business Models. https://techpinions.com/ios-android-and-the-dividing-of-business-models/32237. Abgerufen am 19.04.2016.

  • Bakıcı T, Almirall E, Wareham J (2013) A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4 (2): S. 135-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin CY, Woodard CJ (2008) The architecture of platforms: a unified view. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper (09-034).

    Google Scholar 

  • BCN (2016) BCN Smart City. http://smartcity.bcn.cat/en. Abgerufen am 17.05.2016.

  • Bélissent J (2010) Getting clever about smart cities: new opportunities require new business models. Vendor Strategy Professionals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj A, El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA, Venkatraman N (2013) Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly 37 (2): S. 471-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics 34 (2): S. 309-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • CXOtoday (2015) Smart City: Monetization Models Yet To Evolve. http://www.cxotoday.com/story/smart-city-monetization-models-yet-to-evolve-says-amit-phadnis-of-cisco/. Abgerufen am 19.07.2016.

  • Dameri RP (2013) Searching for Smart City definition: a comprehensive proposal. International Journal of Computers & Technology 11 (5): S. 2544-2551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2016) Platforms are the marketplaces of the future, but not for everyone. http://www.economist.com/news/business/21699103-most-products-and-services-are-not-substantial-enough-make-good-platform-platforms-are?fsrc=scn/fb/te/bl/ed/platformsarethemarketplacesofthefuturebutnotforeveryone. Abgerufen am 19.05.2016.

  • Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review 84 (10): S. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2008) Opening platforms: how, when and why? Harvard Business School Entrepreneurial Management Working Paper: S. 131-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS (2003) Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Review of Network Economics 2 (3): S. 191-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS (2009) The online advertising industry: Economics, evolution, and privacy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (3): S. 37-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • ExCELL (2016) ExCELL. http://excell-mobility.de/. Abgerufen am 04.03.2016.

  • Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2008) How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review 49 (2): S. 28-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles S (2012) One Smart City business model is illusory. http://www.smartcitiesineurope.com/2012/09/one-smart-city-business-model-is-illusory/. Abgerufen am 01.11.2017.

  • Gläser J, Laudel G (2010) Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein A, Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2016) Multiple-case analysis on governance mechanisms of multi-sided platforms, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Ilmenau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirson R (2015) Uber: The Big Data Company. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ronhirson/2015/03/23/uber-the-big-data-company/#4e6380cd25f4. Abgerufen am 04.09.2016.

  • Kitchin R (2014) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79 (1): S. 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mass Factory (2017) App&Town Public Transport. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=cat.uab.onthebus&hl=de. Abgerufen am 15.10.2017.

  • Muzellec L, Ronteau S, Lambkin M (2015) Two-sided Internet platforms: A business model lifecycle perspective. Industrial Marketing Management 45: S. 139-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neirotti P (2013) New business model in smart cities: Emerging trends and methods of analysis. http://www.bestorino.com/SpC13/prematerials/2.pdf. Abgerufen am 19.07.2016.

  • Peitz M (2006) Marktplätze und indirekte Netzwerkeffekte. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 7 (3): S. 317-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflügler C, Köhn T, Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2016a) Predicting the Availability of Parking Spaces with Publicly Available Data, INFORMATIK 2016, Klagenfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflügler C, Schreieck M, Hernandez G, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2016b) A concept for the architecture of an open platform for modular mobility services in the smart city. Transportation Research Procedia 19: S. 199-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two‐sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (4): S. 990-1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffers H, Komninos N, Pallot M, Trousse B, Nilsson M, Oliveira A (2011) Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation, The Future Internet Assembly, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermann M, Hemsen H, Buchmüller C, Bitter T, Krcmar H, Markl V, Hoeren T (2014) Big Data, An Interdisciplinary Opportunity for Information Systems Research. Business & Information Systems Engineering 6 (5): S. 261-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermann M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2012) The role of information systems in supporting exploitative and exploratory management control activities. Journal of Management Accounting Research 24 (1): S. 31-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Hakes C, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2017a) Governing Platforms in the Internet of Things, International Conference on Software Business, Essen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Hein A, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2018a) The Challenge of Governing Digital Platform Ecosystems. In: Linnhoff-Popien C, Schneider R, Zaddach M (Hrsg.) Digital Marketplaces Unleashed. Springer, S. 527-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Pflügler C, Setzke DS, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2018b) Improving Urban Transportation: an Open Platform for Digital Mobility Services. In: Linnhoff-Popien C, Schneider R, Zaddach M (Hrsg.) Digital Marketplaces Unleashed. Springer, S. 479-489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M (2017) How established companies leverage IT platforms for value co-creation – Insights from banking, Twenty-fifth European Conference on Information Systems, Guimarães, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Hein A, Krcmar H (2016a) Governance of nonprofit platforms – Onboarding mechanisms for a refugee information platform, SIG GlobDev Ninth Annual Workshop, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2016b) Design and Governance of Platform Ecosystems – Key Concepts and Issues for Future Research, Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2016c) Modularization of digital services for urban transportation, Americas Conference on Information System, San Diego, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2017b) Governing nonprofit platform ecosystems – an information platform for refugees. Information Technology for Development 23 (3): S. 618-643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreieck M, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (2017c) The Platform Owner’s Challenge to Capture Value – Insights from a Business-to-Business IT Platform, International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul, Südkorea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens (2016) City Intelligence Plattform http://www.siemens.com/innovation/en/home/pictures-of-the-future/infrastructure-and-finance/smart-cities-city-intelligence-platform.html. Abgerufen am 16.08.2016.

  • Taylor S (2014) How to Make Money from Smart Cities. http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/how-to-make-money-from-smart-cities. Abgerufen am 15.07.2016.

  • Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research 21 (4): S. 675-687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tupper LL, Chowdhury MA, Klotz L, Fries RN (2012) Measuring sustainability: How traffic incident management through intelligent transportation systems has greater energy and environmental benefits than common construction-phase strategies for “green” roadways. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 6 (5): S. 282-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walravens N (2012) Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 7 (3): S. 121-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt V (2015) Barcelona: The most wired city in the world. http://fortune.com/2015/07/29/barcelona-wired-city/. Abgerufen am 24.07.2016.

  • Wang Z, Wright J (2015) Ad-valorem platform fees, indirect taxes and efficient price discrimination. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weßel C (2010) Semi-strukturierte Interviews im Software-Engineering: Indikationsstellung, Vorbereitung, Durchführung und Auswertung-Ein Fall-basiertes Tutorium, GI Jahrestagung, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesche M, Berwing C, Schermann M, Krcmar H (2011) Patterns for Understanding Control Requirements for Information Systems for Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC IS), CAiSE Workshops.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximilian Schreieck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schreieck, M., Kolbe, F., Pflügler, C., Wiesche, M., Krcmar, H. (2018). Monetarisierungsstrategien für Mobilitätsplattformen. In: Wiesche, M., Sauer, P., Krimmling, J., Krcmar, H. (eds) Management digitaler Plattformen. Informationsmanagement und digitale Transformation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21214-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21214-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-21213-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-21214-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics